In 1528, Martin Luther (d. 1546), the central figure of the Protestant Reformation, authored his treatise "On War against the Turk" (Vom Kriege wider die Türken), launching a dual critique: one aimed at the looming threat of Ottoman incursions, which many feared would soon engulf much of Europe, and the other directed inward-at Christendom itself. Luther condemned the religious and political leadership of Christian Europe, asserting that their moral and doctrinal corruption rendered them no more virtuous than the Turks and thus fundamentally unfit to confront the crisis.
For Luther, the true origin of the threat lay not in the external menace of the Turks, but in the internal decay of Christendom. The Ottoman advance was, in his view, not merely a geopolitical danger but a divine chastisement-a rod by which God punished the sins of His people. Consequently, he argued that addressing the root causes of spiritual and institutional decline must take precedence over countering its outward manifestations. As long as the causes persisted, the effects-however violent or terrifying-would remain inevitable. Eradicating the causes would, by necessity, dissolve the legitimacy and presence of the effects.
One tragic consequence of the prevalent paradigm, Luther warned, was the erosion of capacity and the distortion of priorities. Efforts meant to illuminate instead obscured; initiatives intended to resolve instead deepened the crisis. He captured this frustration poignantly: "It is a fact that the Turk is at our throat, and even if he does not will to march against us this year, yet he is there, armed and ready any hour to attack us, when he will, and yet our princes discuss, meanwhile, how they can harass Luther and the Gospel."
As the Gaza tragedy unfolds at the hands of the diabolical Zionists and their equally diabolical backers in the institutionalized West, one cannot help but wonder whether the illegitimate presence of the illegitimate geopolitical entity known as Israel is a rod of divine wrath - to borrow the concept and terminology of Luther - by which God visits the numerous institutionalized sins of Israel's immediate and distant neighbors in the Middle East. After all, it is only because of those sins that Israel-created to function as a tumor in the heart of Islamdom-was able to be established and sustained through all these painfully long years.
The emergence of Israel was inconceivable until a conducive geopolitical vacuum had been created primarily through the methodical political, religious, and moral failures of Muslims, particularly within the Middle Eastern region. Once conceived and set into motion, the idea was sustained by negligence, internal division, and betrayal.
Indeed, it was not strength or legitimacy that gave birth to Israel, but rather a convergence of perfidy, illegality, and criminal complicity across multiple fronts. Its establishment and continued endurance represent not merely a political anomaly, but a profound indictment-spiritual, moral, and rational. For where sin festers, consequence inevitably follows; and where the synthesis of faith and unity collapses, affliction finds root.
This means that Muslims did not lose Palestine to the Zionist and Western vultures; rather, they handed it over, served it up on a platter. The intellectual and behavioral missteps of Muslims served as an open invitation to adversaries who had long been seeking a strategic foothold in the region. From the moment Muslims began to engage with the seductive yet untested promises of Western modernity, scientific revolution, and civilizational progress, they unwittingly courted disaster. These paradigms, while ostensibly universal, were designed as much to elevate the West as to marginalize and destabilize the Muslim world.
Once entangled in a vicious cycle, the condition of the Muslim world continued to deteriorate, oscillating from bad to worse. The ultimate consequence was the erosion of Islamic spiritual vitality, historical continuity, civilizational identity, and future prospects, while gaining little of substantive value in return. The foundational Islamic ideals of unity and brotherhood were gradually supplanted by divisive nationalisms, Arab, Turkish, and Persian alike. Likewise, Islamic systems rooted in justice, equality, and benevolence were displaced by alien, undemocratic, and authoritarian models, whether under the banners of communism, socialism, capitalism, or liberalism.
Islamization gave way to varying degrees and forms of Westernization, particularly in the domains of education, culture, media, defense, and social development. Over time, Islam became increasingly ostracized, while foreign templates, often antithetical to Islamic values and consciousness, gained prominence. In the enduring struggle between Islam and its ideological opposites, the former was repeatedly forced to retreat, yielding ground to its antitheses.
This trajectory proved disastrous, resulting in a sluggish and erratic pattern of development: one step forward, two steps back. The crisis was unmistakable, yet the proverbial white elephant in the room remained largely unacknowledged. Few were able, willing, or prepared to confront the uncomfortable truths at the heart of the decline.
Yet this threat must also be reimagined as a potential catalyst for renewal. It calls upon Muslims to urgently reassess the nature of their predicament and to initiate a series of deliberate, adequate, and effective responses. Through such measures, Muslims-again borrowing the terminology of Luther-may "smite the devil," who has long held sway over them, as well as over Zionist Israel and its global supporters. Only then will "the rod be removed from the hand of divine judgment."
Accordingly, if the greater share of responsibility lies with Muslims themselves, then the solutions must likewise be sought within their own ranks. Israel, in this view, represents a personification of a union of darkness and evil with its continued existence made possible only by the absence of widespread light and virtue within the Muslim world. Should Muslims succeed in transforming themselves into a potent source of moral clarity and spiritual luminosity, the seemingly formidable presence and function of Israel would inevitably collapse, swiftly and without resistance. For light and darkness, virtue and evil, truth and falsehood cannot coexist; the former, once awakened and empowered, dispels the latter with certainty and force.
Otherwise, how is one to explain the seemingly irrational spectacle of a small bunch of Zionist criminals operating with impunity in the midst of hundreds of millions of Muslims, executing malevolent schemes against them with little effective resistance? The answer, it seems, lies not in the strength of the few, but in the disarray of the many. Israel appears strong only because Muslims are weak, and they seem effective only because Muslims cannot get their act together even in the most trivial matters.
It goes without saying that jihad, since the time of the Prophet, has consistently struck fear into the hearts of Islam's enemies. Its revival is not merely desirable-it is imperative. Reinstating the culture of jihad, in its comprehensive and principled form, is the only assured path forward. It is the sole means by which Muslims may restore their honor and, in theological terms, "lift the rod of wrath from the Hand of God."