IslamiCity
Listen PodCasts, Live Quran, Watch Videos @VideoHub
In the global race for technological supremacy, history no longer guarantees the future. The traditional path to leadership-years of gradual progress, steady accumulation of expertise, and vast financial resources-has been disrupted by a new reality.
In today's fast-moving landscape, bold and unconventional players can bypass the long climb and leap straight to the forefront. This phenomenon, known as leapfrogging, has become increasingly possible through what scholars and entrepreneurs call disruptive innovation.
Disruptive innovation does not merely involve doing the same things better; it demands reimagining the rules altogether. It challenges established business models, redefines cost structures, and often serves customers that market leaders overlook. It is the kind of thinking that allowed startups to dethrone once-dominant corporations in industries as diverse as photography, entertainment, and mobile communications. In our era, where technological breakthroughs can overturn entire markets within a few short years, this approach is not only valuable-it is essential for those seeking to close the gap with established leaders.
Among the fields where this dynamic is most visible, artificial intelligence stands out as particularly fertile ground for latecomers. AI is still in a formative stage, with no single nation or company holding unassailable dominance. While some of the most prominent names-OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic-command enormous resources, the rapiddiffusion of knowledge, the rise of open-source models, and the growing availability of cloud infrastructure have dramatically lowered the barriers to entry. This makes it possible for smaller, less resource-rich actors to compete effectively if they are willing to take risks and innovate differently.
The story of DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company that emerged seemingly from nowhere to challenge the supremacy of better-funded global players, captures this reality with striking clarity. By leveraging cost-efficient methods, focusing on niche strengths, and moving with agility, DeepSeek proved that disruptive innovation could come from unexpected quarters. For Muslim-majority countries, whose technological ambitions often collide with structural constraints, this example offers not just inspiration but a strategic roadmap. The question is whether they will recognise-and seize-this fleeting window of opportunity before it closes.
Disruption typically starts in overlooked or underserved segments of a market. Instead of competing for the same high-end customers coveted by industry leaders, disruptive innovators offer something different-simpler, cheaper, more accessible, or better suited to new needs. In the early stages, these solutions may appear inferior to established products when judged by traditional metrics. Yet over time, they improve rapidly, expand their reach, and redefine what the market values. By the time incumbents take notice, the game has often shifted beyond their control.
The digital era has amplified the power of this approach. Unlike in manufacturing or heavy industry, where physical infrastructure takes years to build, digital platforms and software can scale almost instantly across borders. An idea conceived in a small lab can reach millions within weeks. Cloud computing, open-source frameworks, and global developer communities have further lowered the costs of entry, enabling ambitious innovators from unexpected places to challenge even the most entrenched competitors.
For latecomers-whether companies or nations-this is the strategic opening. It removes the historical disadvantage of starting behind. The key is not to replicate what the leaders are already doing but to identify where their blind spots lie. This might mean targeting a different customer base, leveraging alternative resources, or developing entirely new applications. Disruptive innovation rewards agility over legacy, creative insight over sheer scale. In a rapidly evolving field like artificial intelligence, this principle is magnified: today's outsider could become tomorrow's industry standard.
This acceleration is partly the result of interconnected technologies feeding into one another. Advances in computing power make artificial intelligence more capable, which in turn accelerates research in materials science, biotechnology, and renewable energy. A breakthrough in one field can ripple rapidly across multiple industries, creating openings that nimble actors can exploit. Such convergence means that even small, well-placed innovations can have an outsized impact, especially when they address global needs.
Another factor is the democratization of innovation infrastructure. Cloud platforms now offer access to computing resources that once required massive capital investment. Global developer communities share solutions openly, allowing latecomers to stand on the shoulders of others rather than reinventing the wheel. Start-ups can operate lean, iterate quickly, and deploy products at a scale that would have been unthinkable for a newcomer just two decades ago.
This environment is particularly favorable for those willing to defy conventional wisdom. Large incumbents, despite their resources, often struggle to pivot quickly; they are bound by legacy systems, corporate hierarchies, and existing customer expectations. Latecomers, in contrast, can choose their battles and move with the freedom of having no entrenched commitments.
For Muslim countries, many of which have historically been positioned as technology importers rather than originators, this is a rare strategic window. The playing field will not remain open indefinitely. As industries mature, entry barriers tend to rise again, and leadership consolidates in a handful of dominant players. The challenge-and the opportunity-is to act decisively while the race is still fluid. Artificial intelligence, perhaps more than any other field today, embodies this window of possibility.
For latecomers, AI offers an unusually level playing field-at least for now. Unlike traditional heavy industries, where decades of accumulated infrastructure create nearly insurmountable barriers, AI development relies heavily on software, algorithms, and data. While access to advanced hardware such as high-performance GPUs is still important, the rise of cloud computing and open-source AI models has lowered entry costs dramatically. A small team with the right expertise can build competitive systems without owning physical factories or research campuses worth billions.
Another distinctive feature of AI is the pace of its evolution. What is cutting-edge today can be outdated in a matter of months. This rapid turnover creates opportunities for agile actors to seize leadership positions before established players can adapt. Latecomers can also take advantage of the global AI community's culture of openness-many breakthrough models and frameworks are published for free, enabling others to learn, adapt, and improve upon them.
Moreover, AI's value often lies in tailoring solutions to specific contexts. A global tech giant may focus on universal products, but a smaller player can design AI tools optimized for local languages, cultural nuances, or specialized industries. This localization potential is particularly relevant for Muslim countries, where demand exists for AI in fields such as Islamic finance, Arabic and regional language processing, halal supply chain management, and drone applications for agriculture or disaster relief.
In this dynamic environment, the ability to think differently can outweigh the advantage of scale. This is where disruptive innovation thrives-and where DeepSeek's story provides a compelling demonstration of what is possible when resource constraints are turned into strategic strengths.
By adopting methods such as reduced-precision computation, multi-token processing, and a Mixture of Experts framework that activates only the necessary sub-models for a given task, DeepSeek slashed training costs dramatically. Its flagship DeepSeek-V3 model was reportedly developed for around $5-6 million-tiny compared to the $40-200 million budgets of its Western rivals-while consuming far less energy and hardware capacity.
This frugal approach was not a compromise but a deliberate design choice. Export restrictions on advanced chips forced DeepSeek to innovate with distributed training on less powerful GPUs, leading to architectures like Multi-Head Latent Attention that optimized memory usage. Coupled with its decision to open-source models under permissive licenses, DeepSeek invited global collaboration, accelerating development and building a worldwide network of contributors.
The impact reached beyond the technical sphere. By proving that high-performance AI could be built without extreme capital investment, DeepSeek rattled investor confidence in hardware-dependent, high-cost models and demonstrated that market "moats" built on expensive infrastructure could be breached. It showed that in the age of AI, leadership is as much about redefining the competition as it is about winning within existing rules.
The first lesson is to shift from imitation to differentiation. Attempting to replicate the paths of established powers often locks latecomers into a game they cannot win, where the advantages of scale, capital, and established brand recognition lie firmly with incumbents. Instead, Muslim countries can target niches that global giants overlook-applications tailored to their linguistic, cultural, and economic contexts.
Second, efficiency can be as decisive as scale. DeepSeek demonstrated that careful optimization of algorithms and architectures could close the performance gap with far more resource-intensive models. For Muslim countries, this suggests that targeted investment in software innovation, specialized AI applications, and domain-specific datasets could yield competitive advantages without the prohibitive costs of massive infrastructure.
Third, open collaboration is a force multiplier. DeepSeek's open-source releases did more than democratize AI development-they positioned the company at the heart of a global innovation network. Muslim countries can adopt a similar approach, fostering regional and international research partnerships, encouraging universities and start-ups to contribute to open projects, and attracting diaspora talent back into their innovation ecosystems.
The overarching insight is that leadership in emerging industries does not require starting from a position of strength-it requires the vision to redefine the terms of competition. By embracing disruption rather than fearing it, Muslim countries can transform their perceived disadvantages into strategic leverage, positioning themselves as originators of solutions that matter both regionally and globally.
The global technology race is not predetermined. The rise of DeepSeek shows that latecomers can move from the periphery to the center of an industry-not by following the well-trodden path of incumbents, but by redefining the terrain altogether. Its success was not built on limitless budgets or privileged access to the most advanced hardware, but on efficiency, strategic focus, and an openness to collaboration. In doing so, it challenged the assumption that technological leadership is the exclusive domain of those who start ahead.
For Muslim countries, the lesson is urgent. The fields of artificial intelligence, advanced robotics, and other emerging technologies are still fluid, their leadership hierarchies not yet fixed. This fluidity will not last indefinitely; as industries mature, their structures harden, and the cost of entry rises. The present decade, therefore, represents a rare strategic window-one in which bold, disruptive thinking can propel newcomers to positions of influence and leadership.
Seizing this opportunity will require more than investment in infrastructure. It demands a cultural and institutional shift toward valuing innovation that is unorthodox, resourceful, and purpose-driven. It requires seeing constraints not as shackles but as prompts for creative problem-solving. Above all, it calls for the confidence to set the agenda rather than merely adapt to it.
The choice before the Ummah is clear: remain a consumer in a world shaped by others, or leapfrog into a future it helps to design. The example of DeepSeek proves that such a leap is not only possible-it is already happening. The question is whether Muslim countries will act in time to make that future their own.
Mai Jianjun is an Assistant Professor in Department of Fundamental and Inter-Disciplinary Studies, Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia.
Faith in the Age of AI: Lessons from IslamiCity
