JESUS PROPHESIED ISLAM :GOSPEL OF MATTHEW
Printed From: IslamiCity.org
Category: Religion - Islam
Forum Name: Interfaith Dialogue
Forum Description: It is for Interfaith dialogue, where Muslims discuss with non-Muslims. We encourge that dialogue takes place in a cordial atmosphere on various topics including religious tolerance.
URL: https://www.islamicity.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6813
Printed Date: 20 April 2024 at 12:27am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: JESUS PROPHESIED ISLAM :GOSPEL OF MATTHEW
Posted By: Kariim25
Subject: JESUS PROPHESIED ISLAM :GOSPEL OF MATTHEW
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 10:23am
|
JESUS PROPHESIED ISLAM / MOHAMMED (peace be upon him) IN THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW ( IN BIBLE ),
AND TOLD ABOUT �PEOPLE OF THE BOOK�-RELIGIONS (in Qur�an/ Quran / Koran
600 years later!), AND TIME-SCHEDULE OF THOSE, AND TOLD ORDER OF THOSE
RELIGIONS WITH DESCRIPTIONS: (Allah knows best)
KORAN: 2:62
(NOTICE THAT �PEOPLE OF THE BOOK� CAN REFER TO
ALL PEOPLE F.EX. IN CHRISTIAN CULTURES, BELIEVERS OR NOT, BECAUSE ALLAH DOES
NOT DEMAND BELIEVING INTO LIES)
MY CALCULATIONS
IN Matt.20:1-16 CHRISTIANS (and
all others), BE HONEST AND THINK THIS: If it would have been case
that prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him) "put into Koran" these
"People of the Book"-nations just to match it with these parallels,
why he did not mention about this connection even with a single word? He tried to get Jews and
Christians to accept Islam with so much effort, wouldn�t this kind of using of
their own writings had been most efficient way to do that? Of course he (peace be upon
him) knew connection, he was a prophet. But there is principles more important,
and in Islam it is simply about accepting that there is only one God and one
God only. And about accepting all the prophets. Simple as that. Either you
believe it (=Allah will make you believe it), or you don�t. Nothing else
matters. Everything else is just
extra. And of course it might have
been also case that realizing these parallels were meant to happen in this
time, when high literature, internet, media and television
offers all possible information about Islam, so everybody will have to choose
their religion, there is no excuses anymore (but for few "people without
knowledge", like children�s, disabled persons, or people living in remote
corners of Africa/Asia/Jungles where there is no information about Islam). Allah most probably saved
(at least most of) f.ex. Medieval Christians, who could not even read Bible,
but were dictated by priests who also kept them without information about Islam
and even gave false information about it (f.ex. about "worshipping
Mohammed himself as a god"). It is time, my friends. For
some reason this part has come for me to carry on. Jesus prophesied Islam also in the Gospel of Luke, also in form of
parallel with �time-schedule� and calculations, even Diaspora of Jews and
ending of Judaism (and its branch Christianity) from �list� of right religions: forum_posts.asp?TID=6446&PN=2 - Other prophecies of Jesus in Bible: forum_posts.asp?TID=6445&PN=2 - http://www.southafrica.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6126 - JESUS GAVE WARNING ABOUT " APOSTLE " PAUL ( AND MODERN CHRISTIANITY ) WITH DESCRIPTIONS GOING ALONG WITH HIS (PAUL�S) WORDS AND ACTIONS: http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/index.blog?topic_id=1021117 - |
Replies:
Posted By: DavidC
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 12:37pm
|
Hello Kariim25, I would be happy to engage your exegesis, but since you are Muslim I cannot assume you accept all of the Christian New Testament as scripture. I need to know the extent of your belief in the New Testament and I will attempt to limit my discussion to the pericopes which we both agree are authentic. I am certainly pleased you accept at least part of Matthew as scripture, but what other parts of this particular gospel do you believe are also divinely inspired? Do you also accept parts of other biblical texts? Please advise. ------------- Christian; Wesleyan M.Div. |
Posted By: Kariim25
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 1:41pm
|
I give you an example: In Qur�an there is no single word about something in a style like "then he went to Bethamy". There is no list of anybody�s ancestors. It is your God who is speaking there. And only He. Jesus did not mention anything about "divinely inspired writings", neither did God. Jesus did not even ask to write anything about him. He was just teaching local Jews. God never said that Bible is completely his Word, or affected by Him, not even Jesus. In Qur�an God said. World is full of people even today who are totally convinced by themselves that they have "divine message" or right to do anything they like because it is how God guided him (Bush is good example). So FOCUS only into what Jesus said in the Bible. Not into descriptions, not into anybody�s interpretations, not into writings of apostles (all those have most likely have had chance to be changed/corrupted, as Jesus has been so respected, that only those who have not believed, or have wanted to use those for other agendas like into gaining power, have even dared to change his words. Of course even there might be errors just because words of Jesus have been recorded decades after he went away, he did not order to write anything). Rest is up to interpretation and also about your will, how you want to believe. I as former monotheistic "christian" know that (I simply started to realize whole Bible suddently, and could not understood how I did not see it before, but I was "blind"), everything you use to interpretate to support divinity of Jesus, can be very easily interpretated and understood in totally different ways, in fact in most cases your interpretation contains several weak links and contradictions compared to other parts of Bible, I recommend for you to read rest of my writings. I QUARANTEE, that what ever you throw from Bible as an evidence supporting christianity, can be easily explained in more simple ways. They just were not THE man. Jesus was. He is only one that matters. Not some church-fathers who decided 300 years later about trinity and about what gospels are allowed. Humans make mistakes, prophets make less mistakes. Islam and Koran teaches that Bible is corrupted. But it is not COMPLETELY corrupted, there is lots of real stuff too. It even might be in slightly different form, but still. I as a Muslim have only win-win situation when interpretating Bible, my faith is not depended on it (but about Koran/Islam/Experiences about life and history), but two completely different sources confirming each others are quite convinsing. But Christians can not use Qur�an to support their religion. I think that alone tell�s quite a lot what kind of God we are dealing with, and what is His Will. Do you really think that good Muslim-believer will go to hell because Jesus did not "bother" to say anywhere that he is "god" or that he should be "worshipped, but instead gave lots of proof for Muslims in Bible about his prophethood and about worshipping ONE GOD by BOWING (he also ordered these to others to be followed). Jesus told that he had not come to abolish laws, that nothing of it would be abandoned untill heaven and earth will disappear, but to fullfil it. Now again, we come to interpretations. You think "to fullfil" means finishing something, making it absolute. We Muslims think that Jesus was so good that he COULD fullfil it, compared to pharisees for example: Matt.5:17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven." There is contradiction: You christians think that Jesus fulfilled law so that it would not have to be observed anymore. So in other words it would be abolished. But Jesus said that it will not be, and that it will not even change. How do you explain that? Reason is simple, it is here: 20. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven. It is about ways of following laws, and of course Jesus as an almost perfect human being (prophet, or for you a god) fulfilled law as well as it could be fulfilled. He gave us an example to follow. Otherwise he would have been speaking against his own words, "Do not judge and you will not be judged", do you think that he would have had any right to criticise following of law(s) by other people if he would not have been perfect in it by himself? Did you notice 5:19? "Apostle" Paul f.ex. denied circumsition, and demanded generally abandoning of the law. What you think "called lowest in heavens" would mean? CALLED BY ONE�S IN HEAVENS TO BE IN LOWEST HELL. ------------- About science and history compared to Qur�an and Islam: http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/ |
Posted By: DavidC
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 2:07pm
|
Thank you. This is going to be interesting. I hope BMZ joins in! One quickie - which hadith were you referencing here:
------------- Christian; Wesleyan M.Div. |
Posted By: Kariim25
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 3:15pm
|
I think that biggest mistakes Muslims have ever made have been totally neglegting Jesus and bible, even though he is most mentioned prophet in Koran. There is reason for it. He is foundation for Islam, he completely changed world. More than you could ever even imagine. Do you see this progress and what ever is around you? It would not be there without Jesus. You would most propably be living under world-power of Romans, bowing to rulers as god�s. Jesus was one to split Rome into East and West through religious (and through it between emperor and pope political) differences, and Islam took East-Rome (and North-Africa, formely Roman area). Do you really think that few thousand Arab warriors would have had any chances against united and strong Rome? I believe INTO ALL THE PROPHETS, as demanded in Islam. So if I do not believe into Jesus (there is no mention about believing into divinity of him), I will not get into heaven, but only through him (and others, even later prophets, like Mohammmed, pbuh). Just as Jesus said. He just were spoking about his time and few centuries forward (especially for Jews, as he said he was send to them only), not about time 600 years later (just in case if you wanna focus into "ONLY through me", even though that would also fit anyway into my belief about demand to follow ALL prophets). Have you ever considered what kind of world this would be without Jesus, and especially without Christianity? Pagans would rule Europe, Africa and America. There would not be one God, but several god�s. Not our moral codes, but human sacrifices so that sun would come up again next morning (etc.). No Abraham, no prophets. In Asia, home for 60% of humans (where Islam has 33% of population, and Christianity only about 2%) things are different, except hinduism there is no god�s (f.ex. in buddhism, but in India more than 20% of population is Muslims, spreaded everywhere, even though government tries to say it is smaller proportion, from fear of loosing power). In Asia many philosophies (f.ex. confuism) and behaviour/habits fit well along with Islam. In Japan they take their shoes of, just like going into mosque. They make ritual wash, just like in mosque. They bow their foreheads in their knees. But for what? Only God is missing. In Asia many too make pilgrimages, but by crawling for years. And if you there believe into God, Islam is most closest and logical option. You can even fit belief into Allah with many other religions and habits, because there is nothing to replace. Christianity was not needed there. What would Africa be like? Expansion of Islam was stopped into rainforest-belt and into East Africa for centuries, untill christians came and conquered continent, creating unified countries (connecting in East-, West-, and Central Africa areas dominated by Muslims to areas of non-Muslims, inside same borders, instead of small hostile and intolerate tribal-states). Immigration movement has mixed populations together, especially Muslims in West- and Central-Africa are escaping desertification to coastal-areas and cities, into this rainforest-belt, where Muslim "missionaries" used to evade spear throwing tribalists. Numerous Africans "converted" to Islam, as they saw it as an opposition to colonial powers. Those who were converted to christianity were mostly pagans, because Muslim have to be very stupid or totally without knowledge to do that: It is just one look into words of Jesus even in the beginning of the Bible, like "God you shall worship, and God alone" (Luke 4:8), or "Your God, is one God" (Mark.12:29). Jesus bowing into prayer on his forehead in last parts of gospels is just final nail to box, god praying for himself? And these pagans converted to christianity are now much more closer to Islam in religious, ideologial, cultural, moral and political sence (westernization has done same for Japan too). How about America? Muslims definitely "found" America first, there is short way from western coast of Africa to "tip" of Brazil, and ocean and wind currents are carrying into that direction. After all, Muslims (traders) were travelling by ships into Korea, China and Japan very soon after birth of Islam. In southern areas as Indonesia you can not see North Star, they knew earth was round. Why did not Muslims stay in America? Muslims had already in 8th-century hospitals where different infectious diseases had separate apartments to avoid epidemics, they knew diseases were spreaded through "invisible organisms". When they arrived, people started to die into diseases (later Spanish used that as a weapon). There was no economical, political, or religious reason to stay there (people without knowledge about Islam are saved anyway). Why do you think that Arabs started to spread rumours in Islamic Spain about sea-monsters and borders of world? To protect "Indians". They saw from christian reconquista (slowly approaching southern Spain), and from crusaders, what could happen there too. But what if this reconquista would have failed? Arabs would have focused on rest of Europe, France in general. Columbus would not have had christian Spanish rulers to support his expedition (it was made much for sake of spreading christianity). Some trading posts in America could have been possible at some point after centuries, but Inca�s / Aztec�s ruler-god�s would have controlled whole continent by then. So christianity did dirty work, again. For benefit of Muslims now immigrating / "converting" there. If you take a look into history, Muslims have done lots of bad things. But thank God there is christians. What Muslims have done can not be even compared to them. 100 million dead in 20th-century alone caused by christian cultures and societies (do NOT say "those were not real christians", they were product of that backround and uprising). Even Koran said that people believe how they are teached to believe, or how they wanna believe. Allah has chosen some to be born into right religion, when their only mission is to hold on to it, and some others into these most funniest religions and places, where their test is just to find that right religion (I bet you christians agree too, if we put Jesus into beginning of sentence). Do you know what REALLY is funny? Vasgo Da Gama thought he had found christians when he landed on India. He thought their temples as churches, and their god-statues as saints (that is also one reason why Indians have been difficult to convert to christianity, they just accepted Jesus as one god among thousands of others that had "visited earth", even "trinity" supported that, Muslims never had that problem). Then he noticed "YOU TOO have Moors (Muslims) here!!!", and decided to "rescue" them. When he arrived to Europe, his number one on a list to King and pope about why India should be conquered, was reason that "we would have opportunity to kill Muslims". After that, massive armadas armed with cannons destroyed all unarmed massive trade-fleets on Indian Ocean, which was totally surrounded and under control of Muslims (that is why these ships did not have weapons, there were no danger). We can see affects of that even today in economical underdevelopement of that area, where lives 2 billion people. Can you see irony in it? Can you see BIG picture? Can you fit christianity and other religions in it? Impossible, but even try to imagine "how would God do?" (Americans just say "how would Jesus do?", even though nowadays it is "who would Jesus bombard?")...... ------------- About science and history compared to Qur�an and Islam: http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/ |
Posted By: Kariim25
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 3:18pm
I am not a dictionary. I can not even remember street-address next to my street. But I remember what I need to, and it is there. You can ask it from somebody else (by the way, there is over 2 million hadiths...). � ------------- About science and history compared to Qur�an and Islam: http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/ |
Posted By: Kariim25
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 3:28pm
|
World is just a funny place. I concider this "God-humour" (history,etc.) to be one of most biggest proofs on behalf of existence of God. Now only thing you have to ask yourself is: Which God? Do you think that God causing suffering (through diseases, natural catastrofies, bloody World Wars, bloody wars between protestants and catholics, bloody hundred-year war...) is "Jesus-loves-you-all"-god or Allah? I would consider that attitudes (through writing styles analyzed) of God in Old Testament would alone point into later one... ------------- About science and history compared to Qur�an and Islam: http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/ |
Posted By: DavidC
Date Posted: 16 September 2006 at 4:28pm
|
This website has a hadith search. I tried first & last and did not turn up anything that sounds like what you remember. Would you please search and see if I missed something? Now to Matthew. You have an interesting hypothesis that MAY fit, but do you have any evidence? I don't understand how you arrived at your timeline, or what links it to known facts or scripture. So far, you have produced an elegant theory that is unsupported. The bible says Jesus always addressed the crowds in parables, but that he would explain the parables to the Apostles later. Mark 4:10 ¶ And as soon as He was alone, His followers, along with the twelve, began asking Him about the parables. Mark 4:11 And He was saying to them, “To you has been given the mystery of the kingdom of God; but those who are outside get everything in parables. Direct quote of Jesus here. My question is if the parable you mention was meant to indicate Muhummad, why did Jesus not share that meaning with the Apostles? Now Jesus used agricultural metaphors all the time. I am going to investigate the use of agricultural metaphor in Matthew, and in the other gospels. Don't you agree that will produce an interpretation which maintains an internal relevance and consistency? I will return with that, and hopefully you can find the hadith through our search function and explain the basis of your conjecture. ------------- Christian; Wesleyan M.Div. |
Posted By: Kariim25
Date Posted: 18 September 2006 at 9:37pm
I really do not have time or patience (tired right now) to find exact form of that sentence, it could have been in different words but with same meaning (remember also that as I heard it in Mosque, SEVERAL times in different situations and connections, it was translated from arabics and very different from original form, you can notice it just by going through different hadith-search programs). But I can assure you that there is such direct hadith. This is what I found in quick search, in these links about one hadith this "idea" will come quite obvious: http://www.islaam.net/main/hadithsearch.php?q=last+prophet+first+to+enter+paradise&searchtype=allwords&hadith_book=bukhari&recalc=1 - http://www.islaam.net/main/hadithsearch.php?q=last+prophet+f irst+to+enter+paradise&searchtype=allwords&hadith_bo ok=bukhari&recalc=1 "............They (people) will go to Abraham and say, 'O Abraham! You are Allah's Apostle and His Khalil from among the people of the earth; so please intercede for us with your Lord. Don't you see in what state we are?' He will say to them, 'My Lord has today become angry as He has never become before, nor will ever become thereafter. I had told three lies (Abu Haiyan (the sub-narrator) mentioned them in the Hadith) Myself! Myself! Myself! Go to someone else; go to Moses.' The people will then go to Moses and say, 'O Moses! You art Allah's Apostle and Allah gave you superiority above the others with this message and with His direct Talk to you; (please) intercede for us with your Lord Don't you see in what state we are?' Moses will say, 'My Lord has today become angry as He has never become before, nor will become thereafter, I killed a person whom I had not been ordered to kill. Myself! Myself! Myself! Go to someone else; go to Jesus.' So they will go to Jesus and say, 'O Jesus! You are Allah's Apostle and His Word which He sent to Mary, and a superior soul created by Him, and you talked to the people while still young in the cradle. Please intercede for us with your Lord. Don't you see in what state we are?' Jesus will say. 'My Lord has today become angry as He has never become before nor will ever become thereafter. Jesus will not mention any sin, but will say, 'Myself! Myself! Myself! Go to someone else; go to Muhammad.' So they will come to me and say, 'O Muhammad ! You are Allah's Apostle and the last of the prophets, and Allah forgave your early and late sins. (Please) intercede for us with your Lord. Don't you see in what state we are?" The Prophet added, "Then I will go beneath Allah's Throne and fall in prostration before my Lord. And then Allah will guide me to such praises and glorification to Him as He has never guided anybody else before me. Then it will be said, 'O Muhammad Raise your head. Ask, and it will be granted. Intercede It (your intercession) will be accepted.' So I will raise my head and Say, 'My followers, O my Lord! My followers, O my Lord'. It will be said, 'O Muhammad! Let those of your followers who have no accounts, through such a gate of the gates of enter Paradise as lies on the right; and they will share the other gates with the people." ....... ......... "Then a bridge (to paradise) will be laid across Hell (Fire)' I and my followers will be the first ones to go across it and none will speak on that Day except the Apostles." As you see, it is clearly mentioned even here that even though Mohammed (pbuh) was last of prophets (/apostles, notice that Noah is mentioned before Abraham to be only a messenger for people), and Muslims last of believers, they will be first to enter paradise. Meaning is still the same as in my interpretation of this parallel (in fact it would not even need a hadith to support it, as Mohammed, pbuh, and Muslims REALLY WERE last, and Jews first, in this Abrahamic tree of religions that Jesus was part of, and thus speaking of). Here is how position of Noah (even though as a faithful Slave of Allah, as all Muslims) as only an (quite failed) "helper" of some few of his people (he was sent to) were described: ......"O Noah! You are the first (of Allah's Messengers) to the people of the earth, and Allah has named you a thankful slave; please intercede for us with your Lord. Don't you see in what state we are?' He will say.' Today my Lord has become angry as He has never become nor will ever become thereafter. I had (in the world) the right to make one definitely accepted invocation, and I made it against my nation. Myself! Myself! Myself! Go to someone else; go to Abraham."..... If this was not enough, I advice you to send direct question to people who know almost all hadiths just by memorizing those....
You could say that there is no evidence, if it were just about this single parallel. But take a look into my link about two parallels in Luke, they totally complete and support this same idea of timeline here in Matthews. And what linked it to anything and how I arrived into this conclusion.....? To be honest, I do not know. Only Allah does. I tried to understand/calculate that same parallel somehow even when I was just a kid starting to get to know Bible. I was puzzled by it. When I found Islam in early 2003, and again began to read Bible after a long period of not reading it (I thought that faith is enough, Bible just a "helper"), it just hit me like a lightning (previous time was over 5 years earlier on these Finnish congregation summer-camps, where I was summers of my 16-17 years of age as a "helper" to guide kids couple of years younger, accompaning teachers). Funny thing, I began to REALLY study Bible as a previous Holy Book, just to give a lesson to this one hot headed inqvisitor who kept blasheming Islam right into my face. I got him silenced only by Bible, because he did not accept authority of Koran.
Notice that Jesus was speaking about that particular parallel said at that time, in that place just in earlier passages. But, well.... "The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables so that, " 'they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven!' And now I am explaining it to you here. So that you outside Kingdom of God ( http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/islam/Cover1.GIF - http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/islam/Cover1.GIF ) would understand. For centuries of darkness you have read it, and not understood it. It has been salvation for numerous of people "without knowledge" (saved according to Islam), otherwise they would have been doomed. Apostles were with Jesus, so they were in Kingdom of God (of that time). Would you consider having Jesus as a teacher to be beneficial, even without understanding parallels? Now when, for some reason this part came to me, this has been explained, you can see, turn and be forgiven. Time for judgement has come (as I have explained in details earlier above), there is so much information about Islam, and Islam and Muslims in all around the world (f.ex. in internet), only few can escape it anymore. Time to make decision has arrived, and it is visible for whole mankind (just write "Jesus prophesied", or as in Spanish or Germany, "Jesus prophecied", into Google and see what comes up). Why not to mention Mohammed (pbuh) directly? What if I would try to explain you about some new totally revolutionally spiritual awakening in a form of a totally new religion, and then would say "ou, don�t worry about it, just be Muslim, there is still 600 years left, you will not be seeing it". Would it confuse you? Those guys were still Jews at that time, crying out loud! Jesus obviously did not explain/handle even christianity there in between very well (if he would be one to blame, of course it was just people who were not able to understand him and his intelligence, as it usually is)..... And besides, Jewish prophet MIGHT think that after that 600 years when (majority of) you have been worshipping him, human being, as a god, well over 300 years, it would not be hard to understood anyway that Islam is only true monotheistic religion of Abraham (really monotheistic christians in Middle-East f.ex. have adapted Islam, as you can see, even christians believing into his divinity are such a small minority anymore. Change took centuries (in Byzantium and Spain) from christian majority under Islamic rule to christian minority under Islamic rule, but it happened. Can you name any christian country in Europe, America, Asia (Philippines) or Africa, where christianity has been accepted voluntarily without forcing/brainwashing from authorities above normal people, who just decided that "christianity with trinity is religion for all of us"? Why do you think we do not have any pagans in Europe anymore? Why do you think we have no Muslims in Spain but immigrants and few "modern day converts"? Why do you think christianity is mixed with pagan rituals and beliefs in Africa and Latin America (it has not been there so long time yet and/or efficiency of destroying "heretics" has not been so successful, or has been abandoned)?
Now I will finally go to sleep, skip a day in school, and do not even try to understand what you just said (language barrier?). Do you think that Jesus was some kind of a farmer, who had obsession for agricultural activities (what kind of plants?), who was not able to speak about (meanings of) anything else? Which kind of soil were your seed thrown on? Do you really think he just wanted to piss off as much pharisees (and others like Romans) just by speaking in ways they would not understand (when he could have as well keep it simple), for no reason?  Go to Youtube.com, write Terminator 3, and watch that movie (parody about Jesus with Terminator).... Speaking about metaphors to be understood completely only centuries later (happened to catch my attention when searching that hadith for you).... Volume 9, Book 93, Number 528: Narrated Abu Dharr: I asked the Prophet regarding the Verse:--'And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term decreed for it.' (36.28) He said, "Its fixed course is underneath Allah's Throne." Have you happened to notice that sun goes around centre of our crown-like galaxy right on its edge, ending up into a black hole (perhaps one giant right in center when it grows enough) some day?------------- About science and history compared to Qur�an and Islam: http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/koran/ |
Posted By: DavidC
Date Posted: 20 September 2006 at 3:56am
|
Hi Karlim25 I don't doubt your word on the hadith, it's just that I am not as familiar with them as you are. The reason the same pericope appears in Matthew and Luke is because Matthew and Luke were both written from the same source material, "Q". Matthew, Mark & Luke are called the synoptic gospels because they were written from the same source material. You are certainly welcome to whatever speculations you care to make about the Bible. I am not here to change your faith or even your creative misperceptions. I can help you understand the orthodox Christian understanding of your Prophet Isa and his message. As a Christian, I cannot take my scripture off into the realm of speculation as you can. I need to stick to the true Christian understanding if I am to be of any benefit to you and my other friends here. Your post digresses considerably towards the end. If you would like to know more about your Prophet Isa, I would be happy to continue but I am not going to get into an argument. ------------- Christian; Wesleyan M.Div. |
Posted By: emsereen
Date Posted: 20 September 2006 at 12:23pm
|
peace be upon you brothers,
I found this discussion very interesting. While brother David is trying to have a discussion and try and understand the words of brother Karim, I find that he is just on a roll. I am also a revert to islam about 12 years ago. I also grew up christian and found that the Quran was an extention of the original bible. Remember, the bible has many versions written and rewritten to follow each sect of christianity. The Quran has not. We do have the sunnah but this is only the life and opinions of the prophet Muhammad (PBUH). It is recommended to follow in his goodness as in Jesus' (PBUH). Islam stated (iqraa) read. This is a demand of God. Read. You will find what is right for you whether to be a christian or revert to islam. peace brothers, emsereen |