Iran: nuclear programme for peaceful purp
Printed From: IslamiCity.org
Category: Regional
Forum Name: Middle East
Forum Description: Middle East
URL: https://www.islamicity.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=3708
Printed Date: 07 June 2024 at 9:53am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Iran: nuclear programme for peaceful purp
Posted By: semar
Subject: Iran: nuclear programme for peaceful purp
Date Posted: 16 February 2006 at 3:53pm
|
Peace, Different side of current opinion: http://www.just-international.org/article.cfm?newsid=20001147 - http://www.just-international.org/article.cfm?newsid=2000114 7
------------- Salam/Peace, Semar "We are people who do not eat until we are hungry and do not eat to our fill." (Prophet Muhammad PBUH) "1/3 of your stomach for food, 1/3 for water, 1/3 for air" |
Replies:
Posted By: Ketchup
Date Posted: 16 February 2006 at 4:27pm
|
I find it incredibly contradictory that countries that own nuclear weapons do so for peaceful means.. they own nukes as a dirrect threat aimed at other countries that own nukes... is wasn't that long ago that Iran denied even thinking about it.. this leads to a question that its possible to entertain the notion that perhaps Iraq does have WOMD? ------------- "The days followed one another patiently. Right back at the beginning of the multiverse they had tried all passing at the same time, and it hadn't worked." |
Posted By: ak_m_f
Date Posted: 16 February 2006 at 5:58pm
|
Ketchup ur a hyppocrite while u support US's nuke programm (not to mentino they used the nukes 2 times), u fail to see the genocide they comitted using nukes, isnt that more dangerous then Iran?. No one can be more irresponsible with the nukes then USA.
|
Posted By: kenski70
Date Posted: 17 March 2006 at 6:01pm
|
What do you know about Japan ak-m-f? Do you know why the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen to be nuked? For starters America at the end of WWII had gotten pretty good at correctly guessing how many GIs would be killed taking a given target. in 1945 Berlin was surrounded.American,British,and Russian armies blocked off the whole place.Americans estimated that 250k allied troops would die taking Berlin. The Russians wanted the "Honor" and gave 250,000 lives doing so. Now america had been fighting Japan all over asia.And let me tell you. The Japs are formidable.Their warrior code is the most fanatical in the world.The japs are the most tenasious foe the US ever faced. In 1 battle, 40,000 japanese troops defended Iwo Jima They knew they would die but kept fighting to the last man. well just about...of 40,000 only 200 survived.the rest fought to the death.....Now given those facts the US estimated taking Japan would kill 1 million of our troops......so lose 1 million troops..or ....Use this new weapon.....Take a guess what we did? The bombs carried by the japanese planes dropped on Pearl Harbour.Were built in factories in Hiroshima. Much of Japans Navy set sail to fight American forces. set sail from the huge naval base in Nagasaki.So those cities were legitimate targets.And way more importantly 1 million American lives were saved. I see no Irresponsibility here or Crime. ------------- Sorry about that turn signal,I must have fallen asleep. |
Posted By: peacemaker
Date Posted: 17 March 2006 at 10:14pm
|
Hi kenski70, "I see no Irresponsibility here or Crime". And till today there are innocent children born with defects. The effect of that radiation can still be felt even after 60 years in those Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, yet you see no responsibility here or crime. There can be no justification whatsoever for using Nuclear Bomb against innocent civilians. All such bombs should be eliminated no matter where they are. Peace ------------- Then which of the favours of your Lord will ye deny? Qur'an 55:13 |
Posted By: ops154
Date Posted: 04 April 2006 at 9:25pm
It was a different time and yes it was completely acceptable to bomb both of those cities. It saved millions of americans, period!!! Notice america has never again used the bomb once it was realized what it really did? ------------- Get it through your heads that I don't support Bush or the Israeli's! Thank your lucky stars for America is here to stay!!! |
peacemaker wrote:Posted By: ops154
Date Posted: 04 April 2006 at 9:28pm
|
Also about Iran, Iran had hidden it's nuke program for a long time. Why should we believe them now? Not even the IAEA has said that Iran is not wanting to produce nukes. ------------- Get it through your heads that I don't support Bush or the Israeli's! Thank your lucky stars for America is here to stay!!! |
Posted By: ak_m_f
Date Posted: 04 April 2006 at 11:34pm
They are buying time to make nukes. |
Posted By: salman
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 5:06am
|
Iran is working towards its own progress and development by continuing the nuclear enrichment programme. no country has the right to stop it from doing so. ------------- It is better to be alone than to be in bad company. |
Posted By: Moona
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 4:02pm
|
If you BOY'S cant play in the right way with your 'toy's',than NO ONE should have them! I suppose only America,Korea,and Israel can have nukes,but no other country? Paleeze. I say get rid of nukes ALTOGETHER! ------------- Moonie |
Posted By: ak_m_f
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 4:43pm
Nukes were the only thing that came between USA and USSR. Nukes saved Paksitan from India during kargil war in 1998. Nukes are the only reason that no one attacks Isreal. USA cant directly attack China over Tiwan because it has nukes. ( they may wage economic warfare, like cold war) In a sense Nuke promotes peace. according to MAD . |
Posted By: superme
Date Posted: 14 April 2006 at 9:55am
|
The oil as we know it is on the way out very fast. Four years ago I read there was a scientist who said that for all these years the government after the other have ignored the call to cap the current use of fossil fuel by replacing it with other means. He said by the time he mentioned this it is already too late. The oil as we know it did not form in few centuries but we running it out in less than century. That day will come, a day without oil to serve about 8 billions people. People with local mind can't think beyond his/her local skull. Oil is running out very fast and it is a fact no one can deny.
|
Posted By: ak_m_f
Date Posted: 17 April 2006 at 9:59pm
| america cannot live without a war - cold war, war on terror, nuclear war - anything to keep its economy going and its lapdogs obedient |