Print Page | Close Window

Questions about Ramadan fast

Printed From: IslamiCity.org
Category: General
Forum Name: General Discussion
Forum Description: General Discussion
URL: https://www.islamicity.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=29523
Printed Date: 10 May 2024 at 2:13pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Questions about Ramadan fast
Posted By: TG12345
Subject: Questions about Ramadan fast
Date Posted: 01 June 2014 at 8:13pm
Salaam Alaikum.

I have some questions to the Muslim posters here about the Ramadan fast.

According to the Quran and hadiths,

1) When are people supposed to fast?
2) Who is supposed to fast?
3) How many days are they supposed to fast for?
4) How does a person determine when during the day he or she is supposed to fast from food and drink? How does a person determine when in the day he or she is allowed to break the fast?
5) Who, if anyone, is exempt from fasting?

Thanks so much.


To be completely honeest, these questions may lead to further debate.



Replies:
Posted By: Abu Loren
Date Posted: 02 June 2014 at 11:16am
In that case I'm not going to answer your questions. :P


Posted By: TG12345
Date Posted: 02 June 2014 at 12:41pm
Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:

In that case I'm not going to answer your questions. :P



Fair enough, you are certainly under no obligation to.

I realize they are pretty hard ones. :P



Posted By: Abu Loren
Date Posted: 06 June 2014 at 12:49pm
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/30

Enjoy!


Posted By: TG12345
Date Posted: 06 June 2014 at 8:14pm
Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:

http://sunnah.com/bukhari/30

Enjoy!

Thanks, I read the site.

In regards to the length of the fast, and who is and who is not to observe it, I came to some understandings. Please let me know if I have understood correctly, or if I misinterpreted or missed something.

 I will post my comments in normal font, and the hadiths and Quran verses in italic. All hadiths are from the site you sent me, and all verses are from www.quran.com.

I will then sum up my understanding in red at the bottom of the page. Please tell me if I understood correctly, especially points 1 and 3.

If I have missed anything, please let me know.


If I understand correctly, every Muslim is obligated to fast during the month of Ramadan. I base my understanding based on the ayat and hadiths below.

2:140

O you who have believed, decreed upon you is fasting as it was decreed upon those before you that you may become righteous -

If I understand correctly, Ramadan starts when the crescent of the moon can be seen, and ends when it is seen again. If the moon can't be seen, fasting should last for thirty days. I base my understanding based on the ayat and hadiths below.

Narrated Ibn `Umar:

I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "When you see the crescent (of the month of Ramadan), start fasting, and when you see the crescent (of the month of Shawwal), stop fasting; and if the sky is overcast (and you can't see it) then regard the month of Ramadan as of 30 days."

Narrated Talha bin 'Ubaidullah:

A bedouin with unkempt hair came to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Inform me what Allah has made compulsory for me as regards the prayers." He replied: "You have to offer perfectly the five compulsory prayers in a day and night (24 hours), unless you want to pray Nawafil." The bedouin further asked, "Inform me what Allah has made compulsory for me as regards fasting." He replied, "You have to fast during the whole month of Ramadan, unless you want to fast more as Nawafil." The bedouin further asked, "Tell me how much Zakat Allah has enjoined on me." Thus, Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) informed him about all the rules (i.e. fundamentals) of Islam. The bedouin then said, "By Him Who has honored you, I will neither perform any Nawafil nor will I decrease what Allah has enjoined on me. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "If he is saying the truth, he will succeed (or he will be granted Paradise).


If I understand correctly, fasting starts when the sun rises, and ends when it sets. During this time, people are to abstain from food, drink, and sexual relations with their wives. I base my understanding based on the ayat and hadiths below.


Narrated `Adi bin Hatim:

When the above verses were revealed: 'Until the white thread appears to you, distinct from the black thread,' I took two (hair) strings, one black and the other white, and kept them under my pillow and went on looking at them throughout the night but could not make anything out of it. So, the next morning I went to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and told him the whole story. He explained to me, "That verse means the darkness of the night and the whiteness of the dawn."

2:187

It has been made permissible for you the night preceding fasting to go to your wives [for sexual relations]. They are clothing for you and you are clothing for them. Allah knows that you used to deceive yourselves, so He accepted your repentance and forgave you. So now, have relations with them and seek that which Allah has decreed for you. And eat and drink until the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to you from the black thread [of night]. Then complete the fast until the sunset. And do not have relations with them as long as you are staying for worship in the mosques. These are the limits [set by] Allah , so do not approach them. Thus does Allah make clear His ordinances to the people that they may become righteous.

If if I understand correctly, at a certain time, people who could fast but with difficulty were exempt, they could just feed the poor. The verse was abrogated, and now everyone is obligated to fast- with the exception of the elderly, sick, travelers, and pregnant women. I found mention of the elderly, sick and pregnant women in hadiths posted on the site "Islam basics".

I base my understanding based on the ayat and hadiths below.
2:184

[Fasting for] a limited number of days. So whoever among you is ill or on a journey [during them] - then an equal number of days [are to be made up]. And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person [each day]. And whoever volunteers excess - it is better for him. But to fast is best for you, if you only knew.

Narrated Nafi`:

Ibn `Umar recited the verse: "They had a choice either to fast or to feed a poor person for every day, and said that the order of this Verse was canceled.

2:184

The month of Ramadhan [is that] in which was revealed the Qur'an, a guidance for the people and clear proofs of guidance and criterion. So whoever sights [the new moon of] the month, let him fast it; and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship and [wants] for you to complete the period and to glorify Allah for that [to] which He has guided you; and perhaps you will be grateful.

Narrated Jabir bin `Abdullah:

Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) was on a journey and saw a crowd of people, and a man was being shaded (by them). He asked, "What is the matter?" They said, "He (the man) is fasting." The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "It is not righteousness that you fast on a journey."

  • A bleeding woman shall fast a number of days equal to those she missed because of bleeding. `Aisha said :"In the Prophet's time we were ordered to compensate for fasting days missed in bleeding but were not ordered to perform restitution for our missed prayers"
  • According to a hadith related by Anas Ibn Malik al Kabi, the Prophet said "God has relieved a traveller from part of the prayers and relieved him along with pregnant and nursing women from fasting."

    Others said that an old person was free not to observe the fast without fidyah) on the strength of the Quranic verse "On no soul does God place a burden greater than it can bear."

    http://www.islambasics.com/view.php?bkID=94&chapter=4


    To sum up, this is what I understood from the Quran and hadiths I have read.

    1. In regards to fasting, every Muslim is obligated to fast- except the elderly, sick, travelers, nursing, menstruating, and pregnant women.

    2. Fasting for the month of Ramadan starts when the crescent is sighted, and ends when it is sighted again. If the crescent cannot be sighted, 30 days are counted.

    3. Fasting begins when the sun comes up, and ends when it goes down.

    Is this a correct understanding?

    Thanks.



    Posted By: Abu Loren
    Date Posted: 07 June 2014 at 3:45am
    1. Correct.

    2. Correct.

    3. Fasting starts before the sun comes up and ends when it sets.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 07 June 2014 at 5:58am
    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:

    1. Correct.

    2. Correct.

    3. Fasting starts before the sun comes up and ends when it sets.


    Fantastic, thank you for answering, and thank you for correcting on point three.

    Given that all Muslims who are not sick, elderly, traveling, pregnant, menstruating or nursing are supposed to fast from when they see day become distinct from night- or in other words, from before the sun comes up to when it sets during the month of Ramadan- what is to be done next year by Muslims living in Inuvik, northern Canada?

    Last year in Inuvik, the sun was up all day from July 9 up to and including July 18- the first 9 days of Ramadan.
    http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/astronomy.html?n=1145&month=7&year=2013&obj=sun&afl=-11&day=1

    This year, the sun will be up from June 29 up to and including July 19- the first 20 days of Ramadan.
    http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/astronomy.html?n=1145&month=7&year=2014&obj=sun&afl=-11&day=1

    In 2015, it will be up from June 18 up to and including July 17- in other words, all of Ramadan.
    http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/astronomy.html?n=1145&month=7&year=2015&obj=sun&afl=-11&day=1
     

    According to the Quran's author and Muhammad, what are these Muslims to do?

    They are instructed to eat, drink and have sexual relations with their wives "until the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to you from the dark thread of night"- or, as Muhammad said, until day becomes distinct to them from night. Then they are to complete the fast until sunset.


    This Ramadan, Muslims in Inuvik and other parts of the Arctic circle will have 20 days of continuous daylight.

    According to the Quran and hadiths, they are to start the fast when they see the day become distinct to them from the night, and break the fast when the sun sets. However, if they abstain from food and drink for that long, they will not survive.

    Also, another obvious problem would with the Quran's instruction to eat and drink the night before the fast, until the sun can be seen. There will be no night before Ramadan starts in Inuvik this year. The last night there this year was on May 24th. The sun has been up for the past 2 weeks, and will be up until July 20th.
     
    Why did the Quran's author (who allegedly inspired Muhammad) not give exemptions or special instructions to Muslims living up north?

    Was he unaware that in some parts of the word, the sun does not set for weeks at a time? Or that Muslims will one day be living in Inuvik?

    Surely he didn't intend for them to die of dehydration. The Quran and hadiths teach that suicide is illegal. Yet if Muslims living far up north were to follow what the Quran teaches, they would be committing suicide.



    Posted By: abuayisha
    Date Posted: 07 June 2014 at 8:04am
    I think all such gish gallop - gotcha games are more appropriately addressed, debated and debunked under the interfaith dialogue section.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 07 June 2014 at 3:23pm
    Originally posted by abuayisha abuayisha wrote:

    I think all such gish gallop - gotcha games are more appropriately addressed, debated and debunked under the interfaith dialogue section.

    Salaam Alaikum.

    I think many people have interfaith dialogue in the General section because when posts are made here, they show up immediately. In the Interfaith Dialogue section, sometimes people have to wait for hours or days for their posts to appear. Also, people have reported that sometimes their posts disappear in the interfaith dialogue section.

    BTW when you said "gish gallop-gotcha games" were you referring to only my posts questioning and critiquing Islam, or also similar posts people make about Christianity? Just curious.


    Posted By: Abu Loren
    Date Posted: 08 June 2014 at 3:36am
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    Also, another obvious problem would with the Quran's instruction to eat and drink the night before the fast, until the sun can be seen. There will be no night before Ramadan starts in Inuvik this year. The last night there this year was on May 24th. The sun has been up for the past 2 weeks, and will be up until July 20th.
     
    Why did the Quran's author (who allegedly inspired Muhammad) not give exemptions or special instructions to Muslims living up north?

    Was he unaware that in some parts of the word, the sun does not set for weeks at a time? Or that Muslims will one day be living in Inuvik?

    Surely he didn't intend for them to die of dehydration. The Quran and hadiths teach that suicide is illegal. Yet if Muslims living far up north were to follow what the Quran teaches, they would be committing suicide.



    The answer to your questions are that those Muslims are to follow the Mecca time line, meaning to start and stop the fast according to the Meccan time.

    I understand where you are coming from, however, the Qur'an is not specific about these things it is the Prophet (SalAllahu Alayhi Wa Salaam0 who explains everything in detail and giving us comprehensive instructions in what to do.

    If you are asking why Allah Subhana Wa Ta'ala and the Prophet (SalAllahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) left out the Muslims living in the Arctic Circle then you're reasoning is in question. The Qur'an nor the Hadiths give any specific detalis of any country in how to go about fasting. Human logic says that people living in these areas will work out how many hours they need to fast and not go about committing mass suicide which is a great sin in Islam.

    As I've suspected your st**idity had lead to you to this. I knew I was expecting something really st**id from you.


    Posted By: Lachi
    Date Posted: 08 June 2014 at 5:46am
    How many Muslim are actually living within the Artic Circle for it to be a real issue? You could equally pose the question "How would Muslims fast during Ramadan if they lived on the moon?"

    Abu Loren's answer gives a sensible reply to such unusual problems. Allah never expects believers to do things that is beyond their ability, nor likely to cause them to fail in Islam.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 08 June 2014 at 6:19am
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    Also, another obvious problem would with the Quran's instruction to eat and drink the night before the fast, until the sun can be seen. There will be no night before Ramadan starts in Inuvik this year. The last night there this year was on May 24th. The sun has been up for the past 2 weeks, and will be up until July 20th.
     
    Why did the Quran's author (who allegedly inspired Muhammad) not give exemptions or special instructions to Muslims living up north?

    Was he unaware that in some parts of the word, the sun does not set for weeks at a time? Or that Muslims will one day be living in Inuvik?

    Surely he didn't intend for them to die of dehydration. The Quran and hadiths teach that suicide is illegal. Yet if Muslims living far up north were to follow what the Quran teaches, they would be committing suicide.


    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    The answer to your questions are that those Muslims are to follow the Mecca time line, meaning to start and stop the fast according to the Meccan time.

    Where does the Quran or Muhammad say that Muslims are to fast according to Mecca time?

    The Quran clearly says the fast is to begin when the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to them from the black thread of night.

    2:187

    It has been made permissible for you the night preceding fasting to go to your wives [for sexual relations]. They are clothing for you and you are clothing for them. Allah knows that you used to deceive yourselves, so He accepted your repentance and forgave you. So now, have relations with them and seek that which Allah has decreed for you. And eat and drink until the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to you from the black thread [of night]. Then complete the fast until the sunset. And do not have relations with them as long as you are staying for worship in the mosques. These are the limits [set by] Allah , so do not approach them. Thus does Allah make clear His ordinances to the people that they may become righteous.

    Muhammad clarified this by saying the fast is to begin when they can see the difference between night and dawn.

    Narrated `Adi bin Hatim:

    When the above verses were revealed: 'Until the white thread appears to you, distinct from the black thread,' I took two (hair) strings, one black and the other white, and kept them under my pillow and went on looking at them throughout the night but could not make anything out of it. So, the next morning I went to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and told him the whole story. He explained to me, "That verse means the darkness of the night and the whiteness of the dawn."

    How is a person living in Inuvik able to see the transition from night to dawn in Mecca?


    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    I understand where you are coming from, however, the Qur'an is not specific about these things it is the Prophet (SalAllahu Alayhi Wa Salaam0 who explains everything in detail and giving us comprehensive instructions in what to do.

    Yet both the Quran and Muhammad were specific enough to mention the sick, elderly, pregnant and nursing and menstruating women, and the travelers. It's not like exemptions weren't given.

    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    If you are asking why Allah Subhana Wa Ta'ala and the Prophet (SalAllahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) left out the Muslims living in the Arctic Circle then you're reasoning is in question. The Qur'an nor the Hadiths give any specific detalis of any country in how to go about fasting.


    Yet the Quran tells "you who have believed" that fasting is decreed on them, and then it goes into details about how to fast, along with those who are exempted.

    Are you saying that Muslims in Inuvik are not those who have believed?

    2:183-187

    O you who have believed, decreed upon you is fasting as it was decreed upon those before you that you may become righteous -

    [Fasting for] a limited number of days. So whoever among you is ill or on a journey [during them] - then an equal number of days [are to be made up]. And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person [each day]. And whoever volunteers excess - it is better for him. But to fast is best for you, if you only knew.

    The month of Ramadhan [is that] in which was revealed the Qur'an, a guidance for the people and clear proofs of guidance and criterion. So whoever sights [the new moon of] the month, let him fast it; and whoever is ill or on a journey - then an equal number of other days. Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship and [wants] for you to complete the period and to glorify Allah for that [to] which He has guided you; and perhaps you will be grateful.

    And when My servants ask you, [O Muhammad], concerning Me - indeed I am near. I respond to the invocation of the supplicant when he calls upon Me. So let them respond to Me [by obedience] and believe in Me that they may be [rightly] guided.

    It has been made permissible for you the night preceding fasting to go to your wives [for sexual relations]. They are clothing for you and you are clothing for them. Allah knows that you used to deceive yourselves, so He accepted your repentance and forgave you. So now, have relations with them and seek that which Allah has decreed for you. And eat and drink until the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to you from the black thread [of night]. Then complete the fast until the sunset. And do not have relations with them as long as you are staying for worship in the mosques. These are the limits [set by] Allah , so do not approach them. Thus does Allah make clear His ordinances to the people that they may become righteous.


    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


     Human logic says that people living in these areas will work out how many hours they need to fast and not go about committing mass suicide which is a great sin in Islam.


    Then you are saying that human logic is superior to the Quran and Muhammad's teachings.

    Obviously, in order for a Muslim in Inuvik to not die during Ramadan, he or she will need to alter some of what the Quran says.

    Neither the Quran's author or Muhammad thought far ahead to realize- or knew- that in some parts of the world, meeting the Ramadan fasting requirements is impossible. So the people living there have to change the instructions that are in the Quran.


    You said that Muslims in Inuvik should fast according to the time in Mecca.

    Not all Muslims in Inuvik and other similar parts of the world fast according to Mecca time. Some also fast according to the time in the nearest locality. There are two different methods, so in other words, there is a disagreement over how to uphold the fast.

    From Rovaniemi, a town in northern Finland.

    CP  |  By http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/arti-patel - David Mac Dougall, The Associated Press Posted: Updated: 07/24/2012 9:38 am

    ROVANIEMI, Finland - How do you observe dawn-to-dusk fasting when there is neither dawn nor dusk?

    It's a question facing a small but growing number of Muslims celebrating the holy month of Ramadan on the northern tip of Europe, where the the sun barely dips below the horizon at this time of year.

    In Rovaniemi, a northern Finland town that straddles the Arctic Circle at 66 degrees north, the sun rises around 3:20 a.m. and sets about 11:20pm. That means Muslims who observe Ramadan could be required to go without food or drink for 20 hours.

    In a few years, Ramadan will begin even closer to the summer solstice in late June, when the sun doesn't set at all.

    "We have to use common sense," said Mahmoud Said, 27, who came to Finnish Lapland from Kenya three years ago.

    To Said, that means following the fasting hours of the nearest Muslim country: Turkey.

    "It involves 14 or 15 hours of fasting which is okay, it's not bad," said Said, who works for a non-governmental organization helping immigrants settle in the area. He estimates there are a little over 100 Muslims in Rovaniemi, mainly from Iraq, Somalia and Afghanistan.

    There is no unanimity on how to deal with the issue, which is becoming more pressing as more Muslim immigrants find their way to sparsely inhabited areas near the Arctic.

    In Alaska, the Islamic Community Center of Anchorage, "after consultation with scholars," advises Muslims to follow the fasting hours of Mecca, Islam's holiest city.

    The Dublin-based European Council for Fatwa and Research, however, said Muslims need to follow the local sunrise and sunset, even up north.

    "The debate on how to do this in the north has been on going on for a few years," said Omar Mustafa, the chairman of the Islamic Association of Sweden. "We fast according to the sun. As long as it is possible to tell dusk from dawn. This applies to 90 per cent of Sweden's Muslims."

    The few Muslims who live so far north that they are awash in 24-hour daylight should follow the daylight hours the closest city in Sweden where you can tell dawn from dusk, he said, noting that it's permitted to break the fast for health reasons.

    Kaltouma Abakar and her extended family of nine relatives came to Finland from Sudan's Darfur region four years ago. She opts to observe the local Lapland sunrise and sunset times before breaking the fast in her downtown Rovaniemi apartment.

    Kaltouma explains that she gets up early and works until the afternoon, then starts cooking the family's iftar meal around 5 p.m.

    "The time of Ramadan fasting is very long, and breaking the fast can be around 11:30 in the evening. The time you're supposed to eat your breakfast is 2 o'clock in the morning," the 31-year old said.

    In the kitchen, Kaltouma's two daughters � aged 11 and 6 � help prepare the food. They fry chicken and pastries filled with tuna in scalding hot oil. A pot of rice simmers on the stove while one girl kneads cornmeal dough which they'll dip into a chicken broth and eat with their fingers � traditional Sudanese style � a few hours later.

    Apart from the late sunset times, Kaltouma said the lack of "Muslim food" locally in Rovaniemi can be a challenge. She sometimes has to wait several days for halal meat and other traditional ingredients to come from the larger cities of Oulu, or Helsinki in the south.

    Even though, technically, there is nightfall in Rovaniemi at this time of year, there is no true darkness. Instead, there'sdn a grey gloaming with occasional dappled rays of sun reaching over the northern horizon, giving the city a mystical quality even in the supposed dead of night.

    The dates of Ramadan change according to the lunar calendar, moving back 11 days each year. That means that by 2015 there will be no sunset for a month when Ramadan falls closer to midsummer.

    Still, Kaltouma says "there is going to be at least 10 minutes for us to break the fast."

    She said there is one positive aspect of observing long fasting hours in the Arctic during Ramadan: the cool temperatures.

    "Unlike Africa, here in Finland you don't get thirsty often. No matter how long you fast, you don't get the urge for water."

    ___

    Associated Press writer Karl Ritter in Stockholm contributed to this report.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/07/24/muslims-in-arctic-look-fo_n_1697528.html

    In the event of disagrement between Muslims, 4:59 however says the following:

    O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.

    According to the Quran and hadiths, neither God or Muhammad stated anything about fasting according to the time in the nearest locality. However, they state that the fasting starts when a Muslim can see dawn replacing the night.

    According to Muhammad and the Quran's author, Muslims up north are to fast from when they see dawn to when they see night. To do this would be to commit suicide. So they are forced to change the instructions laid out by both the Quran's author and Muhammad.

    As an aside, let me say I am glad that Muslims in Inuvik are not committing mass suicide, but instead are choosing to alter some of what the Quran teaches.



    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    As I've suspected your st**idity had lead to you to this. I knew I was expecting something really st**id from you.

    Back to the insults? I think a lot of your arguments against Christianity and some of your most recent statements about the earth are ridiculous, but I don't around insulting you. Are you trying to start another flame war?


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 08 June 2014 at 8:54am
    Originally posted by Lachi Lachi wrote:

    How many Muslim are actually living within the Artic Circle for it to be a real issue?

    Does it matter? Are they not believers also?
    Originally posted by Lachi Lachi wrote:


     You could equally pose the question "How would Muslims fast during Ramadan if they lived on the moon?"

    Currently, no one is living on the moon. That is not the case in regards to the Arctic Circle.

    Originally posted by Lachi Lachi wrote:


    Abu Loren's answer gives a sensible reply to such unusual problems.

    I agree.

    It is a very sensible answer that neither the Quran's author or Muhammad considered when they gave people exemptions. Other sensible answers are that they should refer to the sunrise and sunset of the nearest land. There is a disagreement.

    Yet the Quran's author said that if people have disagreement, they should refer to him and Muhammad. And they say to eat and drink until Muslims can see dawn replace the night, and then fast until the sun sets again. In certain parts of the world, these instructions are impossible to follow.

    Originally posted by Lachi Lachi wrote:


     Allah never expects believers to do things that is beyond their ability, nor likely to cause them to fail in Islam.

    Allah definitely does not expect His people to do things impossible for them, or cause them to fail.

    That is one reason I believe He is not the Quran's author- an all-knowing God would not have placed people in a position where they either have to change His expectations for them, or die.


    Posted By: Abu Loren
    Date Posted: 09 June 2014 at 2:59am
    From the very beginning of your membership here TG12345 on this forum you have been asking stoopid questions without any reasoning or human logic.

    As Al-Saadiqeen21 asked, how the heck are you a teacher? What the heck are you teaching those kids?


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 09 June 2014 at 4:33am
    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:

    From the very beginning of your membership here TG12345 on this forum you have been asking stoopid questions without any reasoning or human logic.

    As Al-Saadiqeen21 asked, how the heck are you a teacher? What the heck are you teaching those kids?

    Having been unable to provide a counterargument, Abu Loren does the only thing he knows how to do well- resort to insults and name-calling.

    I will restate my points.

    The Quran and hadiths claim that Muslims are to fast from when they see dawn to when the sun sets. The Quran and hadiths give exemptions to the sick, elderly, women who are nursing, pregnant and menstruating; as well as travelers.

    The Quran and hadiths say nothing about what Muslims are to do if they live in a part of the world where the sun stays up for days on end during Ramadan.



    Abu Loren states that Muslims living up north are to use "human logic", and fast according to Mecca time.

    I have pointed out that this requires them to change what is in the Quran and hadiths, which clearly tells them to start the fast when they see dawn and to fast until the sun goes down.

    So this would be proof that the Quran's author and Muhammad neglected or forgot to mention Muslims  who would someday in the future be living up north- even though the verses about fasting are addressed to all believers. Or, in greater likelihood, that they were unaware that such a thing would ever take place.



    Abu Loren forgot or didn't mention or didn't know that there is a disagreement among Muslims who live in the Arctic Circle about whether to fast according to the time of the nearest municipality, or according to Mecca time. That indicates a disagreement.

    Also, the Quran states that if there is a disagreement between Muslims, they are to refer to the Quran's author and Muhammad- both of whom instruct their followers to fast from when they see dawn arrive, to when the sun sets.



    Abu Loren is welcome to try to reply to my counterarguments. Whether he will make an attempt to do so, or run away, or throw insults and cite Al Sadiqeen, we will see.

    In response to your last question, ie what the heck and I teaching those kids? As a supply teacher, I teach whatever subject and grade I am called in to cover. I definitely do not teach them that the earth is flat, or that gravity does not exist, or that the earth does not move. Wink


    Posted By: Abu Loren
    Date Posted: 09 June 2014 at 4:38am
    Run away? Don't make me laugh.

    I've answered your questions and if you are stoopid to understand it then well I can't do anything about that. Sorry.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 09 June 2014 at 4:42am
    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:

    Run away? Don't make me laugh.

    I've answered your questions and if you are stoopid to understand it then well I can't do anything about that. Sorry.

    You have been unable to answer my counterarguments.

    Why did the Quran's author and Muhammad provide exemptions to all kinds of people from fasting, but leave the situation of Muslims up north to "human logic"?

    And why tell Muslims to refer to the Quran and Muhammad if they disagree with each other over an issue, when they both tell Muslims up north - who do disagree over when to fast- to do something that is impossible to achieve during Ramadan?

    You can laugh all you want. The joke's on you.


    Posted By: Abu Loren
    Date Posted: 09 June 2014 at 11:01am
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    You have been unable to answer my counterarguments.

    Why did the Quran's author and Muhammad provide exemptions to all kinds of people from fasting, but leave the situation of Muslims up north to "human logic"?

    And why tell Muslims to refer to the Quran and Muhammad if they disagree with each other over an issue, when they both tell Muslims up north - who do disagree over when to fast- to do something that is impossible to achieve during Ramadan?

    You can laugh all you want. The joke's on you.


    A hole I've answered your questions.

    So you want God Almighty and His messenger to specifically mention in the Qur'an and Hadiths that "People in Inuik can do what they like with regard to fasting"?

    They follow the Meccan time line.

    I pray to God Almighty that He gives you LOGIC.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 09 June 2014 at 4:32pm
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    You have been unable to answer my counterarguments.

    Why did the Quran's author and Muhammad provide exemptions to all kinds of people from fasting, but leave the situation of Muslims up north to "human logic"?

    And why tell Muslims to refer to the Quran and Muhammad if they disagree with each other over an issue, when they both tell Muslims up north - who do disagree over when to fast- to do something that is impossible to achieve during Ramadan?

    You can laugh all you want. The joke's on you.

    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    A hole I've answered your questions.

    What is "a hole"? Don't worry, I get it. You are trying to express your anger at the fact that you are unable to explain away an error in the Quran and hadiths, and you want to swear but you are afraid of breaking the rules so you try saying something that sounds similar and will help you save face. Teenagers do that in the classroom all the time. Wink

    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    So you want God Almighty and His messenger to specifically mention in the Qur'an and Hadiths that "People in Inuik can do what they like with regard to fasting"?

    Why not?

    The Quran's author and Muhammad gave exemptions to all kinds of people, why not people living up north? Do they count less than travelers and the elderly and the sick and women who are in labour or menstruating or nursing?

    Unless, of course, the Quran's author had no idea that such parts of the world exist.

    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    They follow the Meccan time line.

    Some do that, and others follow the timeline of the nearest location where the sun rises and sets. Both options are backed by different Muslim organizations, so there is clearly a disagreement.

    There is no unanimity on how to deal with the issue, which is becoming more pressing as more Muslim immigrants find their way to sparsely inhabited areas near the Arctic.

    In Alaska, the Islamic Community Center of Anchorage, "after consultation with scholars," advises Muslims to follow the fasting hours of Mecca, Islam's holiest city.

    The Dublin-based European Council for Fatwa and Research, however, said Muslims need to follow the local sunrise and sunset, even up north.

    "The debate on how to do this in the north has been on going on for a few years," said Omar Mustafa, the chairman of the Islamic Association of Sweden. "We fast according to the sun. As long as it is possible to tell dusk from dawn. This applies to 90 per cent of Sweden's Muslims."

    The few Muslims who live so far north that they are awash in 24-hour daylight should follow the daylight hours the closest city in Sweden where you can tell dawn from dusk, he said, noting that it's permitted to break the fast for health reasons.

    Now what does the Quran's author tell Muslims to do if there is disagreement between them?

    They are to refer to the him and Muhammad- both of whom tell Muslims to start the fast when they see dawn and to end it when the sun goes down.

    So we are back to where we started from. The Quran's author and Muhammad give Muslims up north rules for fasting that they are forced to change in order to survive.

    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:


    I pray to God Almighty that He gives you LOGIC.

    Does the Quran teach that people are to make religious decisions based on their logic?

    Or are you supposed to follow the Quran and Muhammad and religious authorities... and when there is a disagreement, refer to the Quran and Muhammad?

    I'll let the Quran's author answer that one for you.

    4:59

    O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.

    Speaking of logic...

    - how logical is the teaching that there is a huge iron wall somewhere in the mountains, that was built by a warrior, and behind whom is hiding a fierce nation that will be composed of trillions of people (they'll allegedly outnumber Muslims 999-1 on the Day of Resurrection) who are just waiting to rush out and attack everyone?

    - how logical is the teaching that God sent down tens of thousands of messengers preaching monotheism that is in line with what Islam teaches, but there is no trace of the existence of such people anywhere outside the middle east?

    - how logical is the teaching that there was a Pharaoh who believed he is the only god his people worshiped, and who drowned in the Red Sea while pursuing runaway slaves and afterwards has his buildings destroyed... yet there is absolutely no historical record of such events ever happening? The story of Moses and the Pharaoh is found both in the Quran and Bible.

    - how logical is the teaching that God taught David how to make chain mail made up of iron linked together, when such armour did not exist anywhere in the world until the third or fourth century BC?


    If you were to use logic, you would realize that the Quran contains many mistakes. May God bless you with this gift and may you find Him one day.


    Posted By: Abu Loren
    Date Posted: 10 June 2014 at 3:19am
    *** You are on IGNORE for being really S T U P I D***


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 10 June 2014 at 4:31am
    "
    Originally posted by Abu Loren Abu Loren wrote:

    *** You are on IGNORE for being really S T U P I D***
    "
    ....

    typed the furious thirteen year old girl on Facebook, before logging out and going to Itunes to pull up and listen to her favourite Justin Bieber song.



    Posted By: Quranexplorer
    Date Posted: 13 June 2014 at 12:54pm
    The best answer to people like you who tries to create dissension on such trivial issues is already in Quran:

    Al-E-Imran 3:7 He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause) dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say: We believe therein; the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.

    Someone who is on right path by Allah, whether he is in north, south, moon or in space will find a way to obey Allah because what really matters is the �Niyyat� or the intention he has in his mind followed by his sincere action. He will not be worried about whether the sun stays for 10 days or 100 days but will find the right way to perform his fast and it is between him and Allah on acceptance of his fast.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Speaking of logic...- how logical is the teaching that there is a huge iron wall somewhere in the mountains, that was built by a warrior, and behind whom is hiding a fierce nation that will be composed of trillions of people (they'll allegedly outnumber Muslims 999-1 on the Day of Resurrection) who are just waiting to rush out and attack everyone?- how logical is the teaching that God sent down tens of thousands of messengers preaching monotheism that is in line with what Islam teaches, but there is no trace of the existence of such people anywhere outside the middle east?- how logical is the teaching that there was a Pharaoh who believed he is the only god his people worshiped, and who drowned in the Red Sea while pursuing runaway slaves and afterwards has his buildings destroyed... yet there is absolutely no historical record of such events ever happening? The story of Moses and the Pharaoh is found both in the Quran and Bible.- how logical is the teaching that God taught David how to make chain mail made up of iron linked together, when such armour did not exist anywhere in the world until the third or fourth century BC?If you were to use logic, you would realize that the Quran contains many mistakes. May God bless you with this gift and may you find Him one day.



    Coming to your logic, of what value is your logic on these matters when there are many things in the natural world which are beyond the best of human logic. If something is beyond your logic does not mean it is wrong, unless you can absolutely establish it as wrong with solid proofs.

    There are more serious things for people to think like how can men still follow books that have been corrupted to conceal truth with falsehood (don�t know how many versions 66 or 73 or more) when truth has become manifest from Allah through Quran which remains same and stands the test of time on all the counts:

    Al-E-Imran 3:45-49 (And remember) when the angels said: O Mary! Lo! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a word from him, whose name is the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, illustrious in the world and the Hereafter, and one of those brought near (unto Allah). (45) He will speak unto mankind in his cradle and in his manhood, and he is of the righteous. (46) She said: My Lord! How can I have a child when no mortal hath touched me? He said: So (it will be). Allah createth what He will. If He decreeth a thing, He saith unto it only: Be! and it is. (47) And He will teach him the Scripture and wisdom, and the Torah and the Gospel, (48) And will make him a messenger unto the Children of Israel, (saying): Lo! I come unto you with a sign from your Lord. Lo! I fashion for you out of clay the likeness of a bird, and I breathe into it and it is a bird, by Allah's leave. I heal him who was born blind, and the leper, and I raise the dead, by Allah's leave. And I announce unto you what ye eat and what ye store up in your houses. Lo! herein verily is a portent for you, if ye are to be believers.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 13 June 2014 at 7:27pm
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:

    The best answer to people like you who tries to create dissension on such trivial issues is already in Quran:

    Al-E-Imran 3:7 He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause) dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say: We believe therein; the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.

    Someone who is on right path by Allah, whether he is in north, south, moon or in space will find a way to obey Allah because what really matters is the �Niyyat� or the intention he has in his mind followed by his sincere action. He will not be worried about whether the sun stays for 10 days or 100 days but will find the right way to perform his fast and it is between him and Allah on acceptance of his fast.


    So you are saying that the instruction to start fasting based on when one sees the sun rise and to end based on it setting, is an allegory? For what?

    I agree that we should strive to obey God no matter what. However, the instructions given to all Muslims by the Quran's author, make it impossible to fast for some. And it isn't like he didn't think of exemptions. He thought of the pregnant and nursing and menstruating and sick and traveling and elderly. He just didn't think of the people up north. He couldn't have done so, since he didn't know about them.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Speaking of logic...- how logical is the teaching that there is a huge iron wall somewhere in the mountains, that was built by a warrior, and behind whom is hiding a fierce nation that will be composed of trillions of people (they'll allegedly outnumber Muslims 999-1 on the Day of Resurrection) who are just waiting to rush out and attack everyone?- how logical is the teaching that God sent down tens of thousands of messengers preaching monotheism that is in line with what Islam teaches, but there is no trace of the existence of such people anywhere outside the middle east?- how logical is the teaching that there was a Pharaoh who believed he is the only god his people worshiped, and who drowned in the Red Sea while pursuing runaway slaves and afterwards has his buildings destroyed... yet there is absolutely no historical record of such events ever happening? The story of Moses and the Pharaoh is found both in the Quran and Bible.- how logical is the teaching that God taught David how to make chain mail made up of iron linked together, when such armour did not exist anywhere in the world until the third or fourth century BC?If you were to use logic, you would realize that the Quran contains many mistakes. May God bless you with this gift and may you find Him one day.


    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Coming to your logic, of what value is your logic on these matters when there are many things in the natural world which are beyond the best of human logic. If something is beyond your logic does not mean it is wrong, unless you can absolutely establish it as wrong with solid proofs.

    If I were to tell you that a major historical event (drowning death of a Pharaoh, destruction of his buildings) happened that has absolutely no documentation for it, would you take my word for it?

    What if I told you that Napoleon flew in a helicopter?

    Or that tens of thousands of people, across all ages and on all continents, since the beginning of humanity, all preached that God is a Trinity?

    Or that there is a giant magic cross that a mighty warrior set up somewhere on a mountain that, during the End of the World, will provide healing from wounds to all who touch it?
     
    You would accept these statements at face value? What solid proofs could you provide that they are wrong, other than that they contradict everything we know about history?

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    There are more serious things for people to think like how can men still follow books that have been corrupted to conceal truth with falsehood (don�t know how many versions 66 or 73 or more) when truth has become manifest from Allah through Quran which remains same and stands the test of time on all the counts:

    Al-E-Imran 3:45-49 (And remember) when the angels said: O Mary! Lo! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a word from him, whose name is the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, illustrious in the world and the Hereafter, and one of those brought near (unto Allah). (45) He will speak unto mankind in his cradle and in his manhood, and he is of the righteous. (46) She said: My Lord! How can I have a child when no mortal hath touched me? He said: So (it will be). Allah createth what He will. If He decreeth a thing, He saith unto it only: Be! and it is. (47) And He will teach him the Scripture and wisdom, and the Torah and the Gospel, (48) And will make him a messenger unto the Children of Israel, (saying): Lo! I come unto you with a sign from your Lord. Lo! I fashion for you out of clay the likeness of a bird, and I breathe into it and it is a bird, by Allah's leave. I heal him who was born blind, and the leper, and I raise the dead, by Allah's leave. And I announce unto you what ye eat and what ye store up in your houses. Lo! herein verily is a portent for you, if ye are to be believers.

    Yes, the Bible is not free from errors. There are additions that some people have made to it, and people have wrote events in it that did not take place and ascribed some things to God that He could not have said and done. I admit this. It took me several years to realize this, but unfortunately it is true.

    This does not mean that the Quran is true. There are mistakes in the Bible. There are also mistakes in the Quran.


    Posted By: Quranexplorer
    Date Posted: 14 June 2014 at 3:46am
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    So you are saying that the instruction to start fasting based on when one sees the sun rise and to end based on it setting, is an allegory? For what?

    I agree that we should strive to obey God no matter what. However, the instructions given to all Muslims by the Quran's author, make it impossible to fast for some. And it isn't like he didn't think of exemptions. He thought of the pregnant and nursing and menstruating and sick and traveling and elderly. He just didn't think of the people up north. He couldn't have done so, since he didn't know about them.



    The point is of faith which is a pre-condition for fasting. Those with faith will take right cues from the teachings even if it does not exactly fit to their conditions and obey Allah and those without faith will look for excuses to create dissension just like you.
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:




    If I were to tell you that a major historical event (drowning death of a Pharaoh, destruction of his buildings) happened that has absolutely no documentation for it, would you take my word for it?



    As I already mentioned, these kind of general �feelings� or �opinions� does not stand unless you have solid proofs to establish it authentically. Be specific and if you have proofs establishing that all the events of that period are well recorded except this particular one, maybe we have something to discuss. Can you?

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Or that tens of thousands of people, across all ages and on all continents, since the beginning of humanity, all preached that God is a Trinity?



    Quran has answered this for you 1400 years ago:

    Al-Baqara 2:170 And when it is said unto them: Follow that which Allah hath revealed, they say: We follow that wherein we found our fathers. What! Even though their fathers were wholly unintelligent and had no guidance?

    And you are wrong to state "since the beginning of humanity" as the false idea of "Trinity" by some people only started after the time of prophet Jesus (pbuh) and the following Quranic verses clearly points at the silliness of such people trying to join this idea of "Trinity" to prophets before Jesus (pbuh):

    Al-E-Imran 3:65-67 O People of the Scripture! Why will ye argue about Abraham, when the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him? Have ye then no sense? (65) Lo! ye are those who argue about that whereof ye have some knowledge: Why then argue ye concerning that whereof ye have no knowledge? Allah knoweth. Ye know not. (66) Abraham was not a Jew, nor yet a Christian; but he was an upright man who had surrendered (to Allah), and he was not of the idolaters. (67)

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    Or that there is a giant magic cross that a mighty warrior set up somewhere on a mountain that, during the End of the World, will provide healing from wounds to all who touch it?

    You would accept these statements at face value? What solid proofs could you provide that they are wrong, other than that they contradict everything we know about history?



    As I already mentioned, these kind of general �feelings� or �opinions� does not stand unless you have solid proofs to establish it as right or wrong. Lets� not talk about things like �face value� and stuff like that which are very subjective, something of face value to you will not be of face value to me, hope you get the point.

    So do you mean to suggest you will accept something only if it is testified by history? The Malaysian airplane that went missing with so many passengers is still not traceable. So going by your logic, if we fail to find any trace of it, it will go as a non event in history i.e. no such plane ever existed???

    I have already conveyed this point in other posts that any of human tools including science or human reason have their limitations and something if does not fit in to your reason does not mean that it is wrong.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Yes, the Bible is not free from errors. There are additions that some people have made to it, and people have wrote events in it that did not take place and ascribed some things to God that He could not have said and done. I admit this. It took me several years to realize this, but unfortunately it is true.

    This does not mean that the Quran is true. There are mistakes in the Bible. There are also mistakes in the Quran.


    Good, now let�s get in to something that makes sense.

    As you also have agreed, the Bible we see today has been corrupted by human hands, seriously undermining its authenticity as the words from God. And you cannot ignore the argument that the very foundation of Christianity �God�s Trinity� itself is an addition made by the same people who made such changes to suit their plans.

    Whereas, the Quran is absolutely free of any such mistakes or additions just because of the fact that there has been no human intervention in it. None of the points you mentioned here based on your �feelings� stand as a mistake. I am happy to discuss if you have something specific based on established verifiable facts.


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 14 June 2014 at 6:28am
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    So you are saying that the instruction to start fasting based on when one sees the sun rise and to end based on it setting, is an allegory? For what?

    I agree that we should strive to obey God no matter what. However, the instructions given to all Muslims by the Quran's author, make it impossible to fast for some. And it isn't like he didn't think of exemptions. He thought of the pregnant and nursing and menstruating and sick and traveling and elderly. He just didn't think of the people up north. He couldn't have done so, since he didn't know about them.


    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    The point is of faith which is a pre-condition for fasting. Those with faith will take right cues from the teachings even if it does not exactly fit to their conditions and obey Allah and those without faith will look for excuses to create dissension just like you.

    I have faith in God, but not how the Quran described Him. Where does the Quran instruct Muslims to change God's instructions for them?
     
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    If I were to tell you that a major historical event (drowning death of a Pharaoh, destruction of his buildings) happened that has absolutely no documentation for it, would you take my word for it?

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    As I already mentioned, these kind of general �feelings� or �opinions� does not stand unless you have solid proofs to establish it authentically.

    The same can be said about the "feeling" or "opinion" that there was a Pharaoh who believed he was the only god for his subjects, who drowned in the sea, and who had his buildings destroyed by God.

    There are no solid proofs to establish that any of this ever happened.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     Be specific and if you have proofs establishing that all the events of that period are well recorded except this particular one, maybe we have something to discuss. Can you?

    Of course all the events in that period were not well recorded. You won't find any period in history where all the events were recorded.

    Going by your reasoning, one can make any historical claim they want and it won't be possible to refute it. Especially for events prior to the 20th century.

    I therefore could say - according to your reasoning- that God gave an automobile to a noble Scottish leader in the 13th century. We don't know everything about Scotland or the world during that time, do we? Does this mean that my statement can not be disproved?
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Or that tens of thousands of people, across all ages and on all continents, since the beginning of humanity, all preached that God is a Trinity?


    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Quran has answered this for you 1400 years ago:

    Al-Baqara 2:170 And when it is said unto them: Follow that which Allah hath revealed, they say: We follow that wherein we found our fathers. What! Even though their fathers were wholly unintelligent and had no guidance?

    And you are wrong to state "since the beginning of humanity" as the false idea of "Trinity" by some people only started after the time of prophet Jesus (pbuh) and the following Quranic verses clearly points at the silliness of such people trying to join this idea of "Trinity" to prophets before Jesus (pbuh):

    Al-E-Imran 3:65-67 O People of the Scripture! Why will ye argue about Abraham, when the Torah and the Gospel were not revealed till after him? Have ye then no sense? (65) Lo! ye are those who argue about that whereof ye have some knowledge: Why then argue ye concerning that whereof ye have no knowledge? Allah knoweth. Ye know not. (66) Abraham was not a Jew, nor yet a Christian; but he was an upright man who had surrendered (to Allah), and he was not of the idolaters. (67)

    Going by your argument, this is nothing more than "opinion" and "feelings". We don't have all of the information of Abraham's historic period or that of before him. So you couldn't argue that he did not say that God is a Trinity. Do you see how faulty the reasoning you are presenting is?

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    Or that there is a giant magic cross that a mighty warrior set up somewhere on a mountain that, during the End of the World, will provide healing from wounds to all who touch it?

    You would accept these statements at face value? What solid proofs could you provide that they are wrong, other than that they contradict everything we know about history?


    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    As I already mentioned, these kind of general �feelings� or �opinions� does not stand unless you have solid proofs to establish it as right or wrong. Lets� not talk about things like �face value� and stuff like that which are very subjective, something of face value to you will not be of face value to me, hope you get the point.

    Of course, so that is why when we make historical claims, we need to look for evidence. We need to see if there is evidence that backs up the claim we are making. Granted, this isn't always possible. We also need to look at what we know about the time period we are discussing, and see if our statements are in accordance with what is known about that time.

    For example, while there is no way to disprove the statement that there was once a noble 13th century Scottish warrior who was given a car by God, we do know that automobiles were not invented until the late 19th century. There is no evidence of anyone in the 13th century driving cars, or anyone doing so for the next 700 or so years. Therefore, it would be highly improbable to state that any person living that long ago would have had a car. Do you see what I am getting to? 

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    So do you mean to suggest you will accept something only if it is testified by history? The Malaysian airplane that went missing with so many passengers is still not traceable. So going by your logic, if we fail to find any trace of it, it will go as a non event in history i.e. no such plane ever existed???

    Of course there is evidence of this plane existing. We have receipts of people who got on the plane. We have evidence of relatives grieving for their missing ones. We have officials describing what kind of plane it was and trying to figure out what happened to it. We have tons of evidence that this plane exists, or has existed.

    I'm afraid your analogy isn't a very effective one.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    I have already conveyed this point in other posts that any of human tools including science or human reason have their limitations and something if does not fit in to your reason does not mean that it is wrong.

    Therefore you have no grounds to criticize God existing as a Trinity, or anything else the Bible teaches.

    You also, going by this reasoning, cannot state that it is wrong that hundreds of thousands of people from the beginning of mankind taught that God exists as a Trinity (the Bible does not teach that, btw and I don't believe that people did that, but I am just giving an example).

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Yes, the Bible is not free from errors. There are additions that some people have made to it, and people have wrote events in it that did not take place and ascribed some things to God that He could not have said and done. I admit this. It took me several years to realize this, but unfortunately it is true.

    This does not mean that the Quran is true. There are mistakes in the Bible. There are also mistakes in the Quran.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Good, now let�s get in to something that makes sense.

    As you also have agreed, the Bible we see today has been corrupted by human hands, seriously undermining its authenticity as the words from God. And you cannot ignore the argument that the very foundation of Christianity �God�s Trinity� itself is an addition made by the same people who made such changes to suit their plans.

    We can't disprove that God is a Trinity. We can disprove some things that are in the Bible, but not all. Actually, going by your reasoning, we can't disprove anything that exists in it, because science and human reasoning and historical knowledge all have their limitations. So unless you change your premise that it is necessary to have historical knowledge about everything that took place in a certain period of time, any criticism of the Bible you present has no leg to stand on.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Whereas, the Quran is absolutely free of any such mistakes or additions just because of the fact that there has been no human intervention in it. None of the points you mentioned here based on your �feelings� stand as a mistake. I am happy to discuss if you have something specific based on established verifiable facts.

    The Quran is not absolutely free from errors.

    There was no Pharaoh who believed he was the only god his people had,  who drowned in the sea, and who had his buildings destroyed by God.

    The Thamud did not carve homes out of mountains.

    Chain mail was not around at the time of David, it was invented 700 years later, in Europe.

    It is not true that bodies of salty and fresh water do not "transgress" when they meet.

    Jesus was crucified. Early Christian as well as non-Christian historical sources attest to this.


    Posted By: Quranexplorer
    Date Posted: 14 June 2014 at 11:36am
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:



    Of course all the events in that period were not well recorded. You won't find any period in history where all the events were recorded. Going by your reasoning, one can make any historical claim they want and it won't be possible to refute it. Especially for events prior to the 20th century.I therefore could say - according to your reasoning- that God gave an automobile to a noble Scottish leader in the 13th century. We don't know everything about Scotland or the world during that time, do we? Does this mean that my statement can not be disproved?


    Of course you or for that matter anybody can make such statements. But the point is nobody cares about such statements, because the value of a statement depends on the authenticity of the source making the statement. Quran has that kind of an authenticity because of a number of unique characteristics which clearly sets it far above any of human works, including the superior moral lessons, an unmatched ease in handling a variety of subjects as complex as creation of the universe to matters of our daily life, an impeccable consistency of facts throughout its verses, the fact that it has and will remain the same always, the superior elegance of its language, the sound reasoning it provides on various subjects, and the universal and timeless nature of its message etc. So if you want to dispute some statement from Quran, you should have that kind of extraordinary proofs also, not just individual "feelings".

    This discussion can go on and on because any individual can make statements of his choice and unless these are verifiable in some way it doesn�t make any sense and nobody cares about it.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    We can't disprove that God is a Trinity. We can disprove some things that are in the Bible, but not all. Actually, going by your reasoning, we can't disprove anything that exists in it, because science and human reasoning and historical knowledge all have their limitations. So unless you change your premise that it is necessary to have historical knowledge about everything that took place in a certain period of time, any criticism of the Bible you present has no leg to stand on.

    I have only said that all human tools have limitations, does not mean that science, human reason or history cannot be used at all to testify things. They can still be used to testify things within their limited realms, but when it come to things beyond their realms we need to look at something superior and that�s where Quran comes as a perfect fit. With some of the impeccable characteristics mentioned above, it gives perfect explanation to everything while being consistent with whatever limited man has been able to understand with all the human tools.

    But the Bible fails here miserably � its human origin is an established fact and it has many things which are inconsistent with whatever limited information man has been able to understand with all the human tools.

    Whereas all the attempts to attribute a human origin to Quran has been a failure till date and it will remain so till the day of resurrection.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    The Quran is not absolutely free from errors. There was no Pharaoh who believed he was the only god his people had, who drowned in the sea, and who had his buildings destroyed by God.The Thamud did not carve homes out of mountains.Chain mail was not around at the time of David, it was invented 700 years later, in Europe.It is not true that bodies of salty and fresh water do not "transgress" when they meet.Jesus was crucified. Early Christian as well as non-Christian historical sources attest to this.


    Now let�s look at your claims of errors in Quran:

    There was no Pharaoh who believed he was the only god his people had, who drowned in the sea, and who had his buildings destroyed by God � REJECTED, unless you can testify this with some reason nobody cares about this statement

    The Thamud did not carve homes out of mountains - REJECTED, unless you can testify this with some reason nobody cares about this statement

    Chain mail was not around at the time of David, it was invented 700 years later, in Europe. � REJECTED, Iron was known to man from very ancient times and there is no correct record of when its usage started, some even dates back as early as 3,400 BC. So what is the authenticity of saying chain mail was made only 700 years after prophet David (pbuh).

    It is not true that bodies of salty and fresh water do not "transgress" when they meet � REJECTED, it is known fact that the earth has two separate water cycles of salty and fresh waters which are maintained in perfect balance without transgressing each other.

    Jesus was crucified. Early Christian as well as non-Christian historical sources attest to this � REJECTED by the following Quranic verses:
    An-Nisa 4: 157-159: And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. (157) But Allah took him up unto Himself. Allah was ever Mighty, Wise. (158) There is not one of the People of the Scripture but will believe in him before his death, and on the Day of Resurrection he will be a witness against them - (159)

    Now the choice is yours, whether to follow book(s) that have been established as corrupt by human hands or follow the book that you have been trying hard to attribute some human origin but keep failing. And if your choice is still the former one then:

    Al-Kafiroon 109:6: Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion. (6)


    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 14 June 2014 at 12:47pm
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Of course all the events in that period were not well recorded. You won't find any period in history where all the events were recorded. Going by your reasoning, one can make any historical claim they want and it won't be possible to refute it. Especially for events prior to the 20th century.I therefore could say - according to your reasoning- that God gave an automobile to a noble Scottish leader in the 13th century. We don't know everything about Scotland or the world during that time, do we? Does this mean that my statement can not be disproved?

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Of course you or for that matter anybody can make such statements. But the point is nobody cares about such statements, because the value of a statement depends on the authenticity of the source making the statement.

    False. Even a trustworthy source can have false statements.
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     Quran has that kind of an authenticity because of a number of unique characteristics which clearly sets it far above any of human works, including the superior moral lessons,

    What moral lessons exist in the Quran that do not exist elsewhere?
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     an unmatched ease in handling a variety of subjects as complex as creation of the universe
    What "ease" does the Quran show in handling the creation of the universe? Explain what you mean.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:

    to matters of our daily life,

    What do you mean that it shows "ease" about matters of daily life?

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     an impeccable consistency of facts throughout its verses,

    Really? What about the things it says about history that are not only impossible to confirm, but also contradict other historical facts?
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     the fact that it has and will remain the same always, the superior elegance of its language,

    There is no evidence for the Quran having been changed, and I don't know Arabic so I can't comment on its language.
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     the sound reasoning it provides on various subjects, and the universal and timeless nature of its message etc.

    The last 2 are subjective. The Quran's fasting instructions definitely are not universal, since in some parts of the world they are impossible to follow.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


     So if you want to dispute some statement from Quran, you should have that kind of extraordinary proofs also, not just individual "feelings".

    I provide you with sources to back up what I am saying. If they are just "feelings" to you, that's not my problem.
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    This discussion can go on and on because any individual can make statements of his choice and unless these are verifiable in some way it doesn�t make any sense and nobody cares about it.

    The same is true with many of the historical accounts in the Quran.
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    We can't disprove that God is a Trinity. We can disprove some things that are in the Bible, but not all. Actually, going by your reasoning, we can't disprove anything that exists in it, because science and human reasoning and historical knowledge all have their limitations. So unless you change your premise that it is necessary to have historical knowledge about everything that took place in a certain period of time, any criticism of the Bible you present has no leg to stand on.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    I have only said that all human tools have limitations, does not mean that science, human reason or history cannot be used at all to testify things. They can still be used to testify things within their limited realms, but when it come to things beyond their realms we need to look at something superior and that�s where Quran comes as a perfect fit. With some of the impeccable characteristics mentioned above, it gives perfect explanation to everything while being consistent with whatever limited man has been able to understand with all the human tools.

    You seem to be saying it is alright to use science, history and reasoning to challenge the Bible but when someone does the same with the Quran, we can't do it because it is "superior".
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    But the Bible fails here miserably � its human origin is an established fact and it has many things which are inconsistent with whatever limited information man has been able to understand with all the human tools.

    The Quran also has many things which are inconsistent with whatever limited knowledge man has been able to understand with all the human tools.
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Whereas all the attempts to attribute a human origin to Quran has been a failure till date and it will remain so till the day of resurrection.

    If you believe God makes errors, perhaps you are correct.
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:


    The Quran is not absolutely free from errors. There was no Pharaoh who believed he was the only god his people had, who drowned in the sea, and who had his buildings destroyed by God.The Thamud did not carve homes out of mountains.Chain mail was not around at the time of David, it was invented 700 years later, in Europe.It is not true that bodies of salty and fresh water do not "transgress" when they meet.Jesus was crucified. Early Christian as well as non-Christian historical sources attest to this.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Now let�s look at your claims of errors in Quran:

    There was no Pharaoh who believed he was the only god his people had, who drowned in the sea, and who had his buildings destroyed by God � REJECTED, unless you can testify this with some reason nobody cares about this statement

    This is quite easy. Egyptian religion was a polytheistic one, and the Ancient Egyptians worshiped both their Pharaohs and their other gods. There was no Pharaoh who would have been unaware that his people had gods other than he.

    Regarding a Pharaoh drowning in the sea and whose buildings have been destroyed, the burden of proof is on the one making such claims.

    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    The Thamud did not carve homes out of mountains - REJECTED, unless you can testify this with some reason nobody cares about this statement

    The only buildings that exist at Madain Saleh that are carved from mountains are Nabatean tombs. The area hadn't had human interference for hundreds of years both before and after the Quran was written, so there is very little chance that they would have been destroyed but not the Nabatean ones. Muslim scholars have confused Nabatean architecture with those of the Thamud.
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Chain mail was not around at the time of David, it was invented 700 years later, in Europe. � REJECTED, Iron was known to man from very ancient times and there is no correct record of when its usage started, some even dates back as early as 3,400 BC. So what is the authenticity of saying chain mail was made only 700 years after prophet David (pbuh).

    Do you know the difference between iron and chain mail? There is no correct record of when the usage of iron started, but there is record of when usage of chain mail started.
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    It is not true that bodies of salty and fresh water do not "transgress" when they meet � REJECTED, it is known fact that the earth has two separate water cycles of salty and fresh waters which are maintained in perfect balance without transgressing each other.

    What do you understand by saying they do not transgress?
    Originally posted by Quranexplorer Quranexplorer wrote:


    Jesus was crucified. Early Christian as well as non-Christian historical sources attest to this � REJECTED by the following Quranic verses:
    An-Nisa 4: 157-159: And because of their saying: We slew the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, Allah's messenger - they slew him not nor crucified him, but it appeared so unto them; and lo! those who disagree concerning it are in doubt thereof; they have no knowledge thereof save pursuit of a conjecture; they slew him not for certain. (157) But Allah took him up unto Himself. Allah was ever Mighty, Wise. (158) There is not one of the People of the Scripture but will believe in him before his death, and on the Day of Resurrection he will be a witness against them - (159)

    How is that a refutation of anything? You provided an opinion of someone who rejects that the crucifixion happened.

    [QUOTE=Quranexplorer]
    Now the choice is yours, whether to follow book(s) that have been established as corrupt by human hands or follow the book that you have been trying hard to attribute some human origin but keep failing. And if your choice is still the former one then:

    Al-Kafiroon 109:6: Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion. (6)

    You haven't demonstrated that the Quran is from God.


    Posted By: islamispeace
    Date Posted: 14 June 2014 at 1:31pm
    This topic is an interesting one, but what I don't understand is why we seem to have gotten off track.  This topic is about the rules of fasting under extenuating circumstances, so why are people talking about Gog and Magog, Thamud and other issues?  TG12345 started this topic and yet has spent the last few posts talking about completely unrelated issues, which have been dealt with in detail in other places.  For those interested, they can read the following thread where I have responded to TG's claims about "errors" in the Quran as well as pointed out his double standards and hypocrisy with regard to the errors in the Bible:

    http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28030&PID=185819#185819 - http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=28030&PID=185819#185819

    He has insisted that while the Bible has errors, it does not mean that either Christianity or the Bible are false, yet he has also insisted that "errors" in other religions somehow invalidate those religions.  That is an interesting example of the pot calling the kettle black and those who are interested in having a discussion on it can do so by going to  the link above.  Let us get back to the topic at hand on this thread.

    The claim that TG has made is that the Quran has committed an "error" by not realizing that there are some regions of the world where fasting would be extremely difficult.  Yet this argument is fallacious for the following reasons.

    First, it has already been pointed out that when the crescent moon cannot be sighted due to cloud cover, Muslims are told to "estimate" and complete 30 days of Shaban before beginning Ramadan.  This is proven in the hadith literature:

    "Narrated Abdullah bin Umar:

    Allah's Apostle mentioned Ramadan and said, "Do not fast unless you see the crescent (of Ramadan), and do not give up fasting till you see the crescent (of Shawwal), but if the sky is overcast (if you cannot see it), then act on estimation (i.e. count Sha'ban as 30 days)."" (Sahih Bukhari, Book 31, Number 130)

    So, since estimating is clearly allowed, on what grounds can anyone object to the solutions that Abu Loren and others have suggested (i.e. that people living in places like Alaska can fast based on the timings of Mecca)?  Another option for these people is to estimate their fasting times based on the time of the nearest country where the sun is visible on a regular basis.  This is the view of many scholars.  Here is an example of a fatwa on this subject:

    "We believe that Muslims living near to the North and South poles and what is close to them; in which the days are long and nights short; have two choices when it comes to fasting Ramadan:

    - Either to abide by the timings of the countries in which the Islamic legislations appeared and in which day and night hours are in moderation (Mecca and Medina). That is, to fast the same number of hours as these two cities.


    -Or to calculate the hours of fasting in the closest country, in which day and night hours are in moderation; and in which the wisdom of Allah Almighty�s decree of Prayers and Fasting is maintained without resulting in too much exhaustion or fatigue.


    As it might not be easy to calculate the closest country to Sweden that maintains this status, we are more inclined towards proposing that Muslims who live in Sweden and other countries with the same situation, to fast the exact number of hours that Muslims fast in Mecca and Medina. Taking into factor, that their fasting starts at the time of Fadjr in their location [Sweden, etc.], without taking into account their day and night hours, nor having to wait for sunset or nightfall to stop fasting.


    We reached this conclusion in accordance with what scholars pursue when it comes to estimating the timings of Prayers and Fasting and following the orders of Allah and His guidance in the Holy Quran, as Allah in His mercy says: {Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship and [wants] for you to complete the period and to glorify Allah for that [to] which He has guided you; and perhaps you will be grateful.} (Surat Albaqarah 2: 185). Allah Almighty also says: {Allah does not charge a soul except [with that within] its capacity.} (Surat Albaqarah 2: 286)." ( http://mission-alnoor.org/Admin/asp/Mailed_details.asp?M_ID=821 - http://mission-alnoor.org/Admin/asp/Mailed_details.asp?M_ID=821 )


    Estimating prayers times have also been proven in the hadith literature.  For example, in a hadith about the coming of the Dajjal, it is stated that Muslims should estimate their prayers during the tribulation:

    "[...]
    He (Dajjal) would be a young man with twisted, contracted hair, and a blind eye. I compare him to 'Abd-ul-'Uzza b. Qatan. He who amongst you would survive to see him should recite over him the opening verses of Sura Kahf (xviii.). He would appear on the way between Syria and Iraq and would spread mischief right and left. O servant of Allah! adhere (to the path of Truth). We said: Allah's Messenger, how long would he stay on the earth? He said.. For forty days, one day like a year and one day like a month and one day like a week and the rest of the days would be like your days. We said: Allah's Messenger, would one day's prayer suffice for the prayers of day equal to one year? Thereupon he said: No, but you must make an estimate of time (and then observe prayer). [...]" (Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Number 7015)

    Scholars refer to this hadith as proof that estimating prayers (and fasts) is allowed in extreme situations.  The website "www.islamtoday.com" states:

    "
    All Muslim scholars agree that whenever there is perpetual day or perpetual night for 24 hours or more, the prayer times during the affected days should be approximated. This is because the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: "There will come a time when there will be a day like a year, a day like a month, and a day like a week�" The people asked him if during the day like a year, should they offer each prayer only once. He replied: "You should approximate the times." [Sah�h Muslim]" ( http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-384-3955.htm - http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-384-3955.htm )

    Since the timing of prayer and fasting both depend on the position of the sun, and since estimating prayer under extenuating circumstances is clearly established, then the same rules would apply to fasting.  Estimating the time would be perfectly acceptable under the rules of the Sharia.

    Second, in most inhabited areas near the poles, it is nevertheless possible to calculate the fasting times, so this is another option for people living in these areas.  As the website www.moonsighting.com explains:

    "
    The answer is simpler than what you may think. Polar regions like Norway, Finland, and Alaska have areas where the sun stays below horizon for several months in winter, and stays above horizon for several months in summer. However, there comes a time in every day when the sun is at its highset point (Noon) and at lowest point (Midnight). At temperate latitudes, the highest point is visible but lowest point is below horizon. But at higher latitudes (Polar region, like Norway, Finland, and Alaska) the highest and lowest point occur below horizon in winter (meaning several months long night), and above horizon in summer when the sun never sets for several months (meaning several months long day). But we can calculate those two points and determine Prayer times around those two known times every day. Having determined the prayer times, the fasting time is already set. " ( http://moonsighting.com/faq_pt.html#G2 - http://moonsighting.com/faq_pt.html#G2 )
    http:// -
    The website also provides a chart (which is too big to paste here), which shows that in most locations, it is still possible, using the calculations, to determine the fasting times.  While some of these times can be rather long, almost 24 hours in some cases, they are still within the capacity of most people to do. 

    Finally, it should be stated that these rulings apply to highly irregular and rare circumstances which affect a very small number of Muslims.  These situations didn't even surface until quite recently.  To claim that it is a major "error" is like claiming that since the Quran does not mention rulings on things like praying on airplanes it is somehow an "error".  That is specious and childish reasoning at best.   

    Islam is a religion of practicality, which is more than I can say about some other religions.  Under extenuating circumstances, the teachings of the Quran must be taken into account:

    "
    Ramadhan is the (month) in which was sent down the Qur'an, as a guide to mankind, also clear (Signs) for guidance and judgment (Between right and wrong). So every one of you who is present (at his home) during that month should spend it in fasting, but if any one is ill, or on a journey, the prescribed period (Should be made up) by days later. Allah intends every facility for you; He does not want to put you to difficulties. (He wants you) to complete the prescribed period, and to glorify Him in that He has guided you; and perchance ye shall be grateful." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:185)

    "
    So fear Allah as much as ye can; listen and obey and spend in charity for the benefit of your own soul and those saved from the covetousness of their own souls,- they are the ones that achieve prosperity." (Surah At-Taghabun, 64:16)   

    Allah knows best!


    -------------
    Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)



    Posted By: TG12345
    Date Posted: 14 June 2014 at 8:25pm

    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:


    The claim that TG has made is that the Quran has committed an "error" by not realizing that there are some regions of the world where fasting would be extremely difficult.  Yet this argument is fallacious for the following reasons.

    First, it has already been pointed out that when the crescent moon cannot be sighted due to cloud cover, Muslims are told to "estimate" and complete 30 days of Shaban before beginning Ramadan.  This is proven in the hadith literature:

    "Narrated Abdullah bin Umar:

    Allah's Apostle mentioned Ramadan and said, "Do not fast unless you see the crescent (of Ramadan), and do not give up fasting till you see the crescent (of Shawwal), but if the sky is overcast (if you cannot see it), then act on estimation (i.e. count Sha'ban as 30 days)."" (Sahih Bukhari, Book 31, Number 130)

    So, since estimating is clearly allowed, on what grounds can anyone object to the solutions that Abu Loren and others have suggested (i.e. that people living in places like Alaska can fast based on the timings of Mecca)?

    For the simple reason that Muhammad told people what to do if the moon is covered up, but not if the sun is up all day. Both he and the Quran's author came up with many exemptions for different people, and as we shall see later on, with what Muslims should do in the end times. However, neither of them considered the possibility that there are some parts of the world where the sun does not go down for weeks at a time.

    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

      Another option for these people is to estimate their fasting times based on the time of the nearest country where the sun is visible on a regular basis.  This is the view of many scholars.  Here is an example of a fatwa on this subject:

    "We believe that Muslims living near to the North and South poles and what is close to them; in which the days are long and nights short; have two choices when it comes to fasting Ramadan:

    - Either to abide by the timings of the countries in which the Islamic legislations appeared and in which day and night hours are in moderation (Mecca and Medina). That is, to fast the same number of hours as these two cities.


    -Or to calculate the hours of fasting in the closest country, in which day and night hours are in moderation; and in which the wisdom of Allah Almighty�s decree of Prayers and Fasting is maintained without resulting in too much exhaustion or fatigue.


    As it might not be easy to calculate the closest country to Sweden that maintains this status, we are more inclined towards proposing that Muslims who live in Sweden and other countries with the same situation, to fast the exact number of hours that Muslims fast in Mecca and Medina. Taking into factor, that their fasting starts at the time of Fadjr in their location [Sweden, etc.], without taking into account their day and night hours, nor having to wait for sunset or nightfall to stop fasting.


    We reached this conclusion in accordance with what scholars pursue when it comes to estimating the timings of Prayers and Fasting and following the orders of Allah and His guidance in the Holy Quran, as Allah in His mercy says: {Allah intends for you ease and does not intend for you hardship and [wants] for you to complete the period and to glorify Allah for that [to] which He has guided you; and perhaps you will be grateful.} (Surat Albaqarah 2: 185). Allah Almighty also says: {Allah does not charge a soul except [with that within] its capacity.} (Surat Albaqarah 2: 286)." ( http://mission-alnoor.org/Admin/asp/Mailed_details.asp?M_ID=821 - http://mission-alnoor.org/Admin/asp/Mailed_details.asp?M_ID=821 )


    That's nice, but not all Muslim scholars agree. In 2012 at least, some scholars told Muslims to fast according to Mecca time, and others according to local time, in places where the sun does set. There was a disagreement.

    There is no unanimity on how to deal with the issue, which is becoming more pressing as more Muslim immigrants find their way to sparsely inhabited areas near the Arctic.

    In Alaska, the Islamic Community Center of Anchorage, "after consultation with scholars," advises Muslims to follow the fasting hours of Mecca, Islam's holiest city.

    The Dublin-based European Council for Fatwa and Research, however, said Muslims need to follow the local sunrise and sunset, even up north.

    "The debate on how to do this in the north has been on going on for a few years," said Omar Mustafa, the chairman of the Islamic Association of Sweden. "We fast according to the sun. As long as it is possible to tell dusk from dawn. This applies to 90 per cent of Sweden's Muslims."

    The few Muslims who live so far north that they are awash in 24-hour daylight should follow the daylight hours the closest city in Sweden where you can tell dawn from dusk, he said, noting that it's permitted to break the fast for health reasons.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/07/24/muslims-in-arctic-look-fo_n_1697528.html


    The Quran's author tells his followers, that if they are unable to come to an agreement of an issue, to refer it to him and Muhammad.

    4:59

    O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.

    Tafsir Al Jalalayn

    O you who believe, obey God, and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you, that is, rulers, when they command you to obey God and His Messenger. If you should quarrel, disagree, about anything, refer it to God, that is, to His Book, and the Messenger, while he lives, and thereafter [refer] to his Sunna: in other words examine these [disputes] with reference to these two [sources], if you believe in God and the Last Day; that, reference to the two [sources], is better, for you than quarrelling or [adhering to] personal opinions, and more excellent in interpretation, in the end.
    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=4&tAyahNo=59&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

    Tafsir Ibn Abbas


    (O ye who believe!) 'Uthman Ibn Talhah and his fellow believers. (Obey Allah) in that which He has commanded you, (and obey the messenger) in that which he commands you (and those of you who are in authority) the leaders of military expeditions; it also said that this means: the men of sacred knowledge; (and if ye have a dispute concerning any matter, refer it to Allah) to the Book of Allah (and the messenger) and to the practice of the Messenger (if you are (in truth) believers in Allah and the Last Day) resurrection after death. (That) referring the matter to the Book of Allah and the practice of His Messenger (is better and more seemly in the end).
    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=4&tAyahNo=59&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

    Tafsir Ibn Qathir

    ((And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger). Mujahid and several others among the Salaf said that the Ayah means, "(Refer) to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger.'' This is a command from Allah that whatever areas the people dispute about, whether major or minor areas of the religion, they are required to refer to the Qur'an and Sunnah for judgment concerning these disputes. In another Ayah, Allah said,

    (And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah). Therefore, whatever the Book and Sunnah decide and testify to the truth of, then it, is the plain truth. What is beyond truth, save falsehood This is why Allah said, u

    (if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day.) meaning, refer the disputes and conflicts that arise between you to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger for judgment. Allah's statement,

    (if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day. ) indicates that those who do not refer to the Book and Sunnah for judgment in their disputes, are not believers in Allah or the Last Day. Allah said...

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=644&Itemid=59

    The scholars in 2012- and the Muslims who needed to know what to do during Ramadan- should have turned to the Quran and Sunnah for judgement. Both of these sources tell Muslims to fast from when they see the sun rise to when it sets.


    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:


    Estimating prayers times have also been proven in the hadith literature.  For example, in a hadith about the coming of the Dajjal, it is stated that Muslims should estimate their prayers during the tribulation:

    "[...] He (Dajjal) would be a young man with twisted, contracted hair, and a blind eye. I compare him to 'Abd-ul-'Uzza b. Qatan. He who amongst you would survive to see him should recite over him the opening verses of Sura Kahf (xviii.). He would appear on the way between Syria and Iraq and would spread mischief right and left. O servant of Allah! adhere (to the path of Truth). We said: Allah's Messenger, how long would he stay on the earth? He said.. For forty days, one day like a year and one day like a month and one day like a week and the rest of the days would be like your days. We said: Allah's Messenger, would one day's prayer suffice for the prayers of day equal to one year? Thereupon he said: No, but you must make an estimate of time (and then observe prayer). [...]" (Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Number 7015)


    This is in regards to daily prayer, not to fasting. And it is in regards to the End Times, not ordinary times.

    What is interesting is that Muhammad was considerate enough to tell 7th century Muslims what to do when the Dajjal comes (and he hasn't came yet), but left nothing in terms of instruction for 20th century Muslims and Muslims in the first 14 years of the 21st.

    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

     
    Scholars refer to this hadith as proof that estimating prayers (and fasts) is allowed in extreme situations.  The website "www.islamtoday.com" states:

    "All Muslim scholars agree that whenever there is perpetual day or perpetual night for 24 hours or more, the prayer times during the affected days should be approximated. This is because the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: "There will come a time when there will be a day like a year, a day like a month, and a day like a week�" The people asked him if during the day like a year, should they offer each prayer only once. He replied: "You should approximate the times." [Sah�h Muslim]" ( http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-384-3955.htm - http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-384-3955.htm )

    Since the timing of prayer and fasting both depend on the position of the sun, and since estimating prayer under extenuating circumstances is clearly established, then the same rules would apply to fasting.  Estimating the time would be perfectly acceptable under the rules of the Sharia.

    However, Muhammad was not referring to ordinary days, but to the End Times... after the coming of the Dajjal. He also didn't say anything about how to fast when the sun stays up all day.


    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

    Second, in most inhabited areas near the poles, it is nevertheless possible to calculate the fasting times, so this is another option for people living in these areas.  As the website www.moonsighting.com explains:

    "The answer is simpler than what you may think. Polar regions like Norway, Finland, and Alaska have areas where the sun stays below horizon for several months in winter, and stays above horizon for several months in summer. However, there comes a time in every day when the sun is at its highset point (Noon) and at lowest point (Midnight). At temperate latitudes, the highest point is visible but lowest point is below horizon. But at higher latitudes (Polar region, like Norway, Finland, and Alaska) the highest and lowest point occur below horizon in winter (meaning several months long night), and above horizon in summer when the sun never sets for several months (meaning several months long day). But we can calculate those two points and determine Prayer times around those two known times every day. Having determined the prayer times, the fasting time is already set. " ( http://moonsighting.com/faq_pt.html#G2 - http://moonsighting.com/faq_pt.html#G2 )
    http:// -
    The website also provides a chart (which is too big to paste here), which shows that in most locations, it is still possible, using the calculations, to determine the fasting times.  While some of these times can be rather long, almost 24 hours in some cases, they are still within the capacity of most people to do. 

    In "most" locations, yes. But not all.

    Also, the Quran says nothing about being able to see or not see the "highest" or "lowest" point of the sun. Fasting starts when "the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to you from the black thread of night". Muhammad clarified that the black thread is a reference to the darkness of night and the white thread is a reference to the whiteness of dawn.


    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

     
    Finally, it should be stated that these rulings apply to highly irregular and rare circumstances which affect a very small number of Muslims.  These situations didn't even surface until quite recently.  To claim that it is a major "error" is like claiming that since the Quran does not mention rulings on things like praying on airplanes it is somehow an "error".  That is specious and childish reasoning at best.   

    What difference does it make how many Muslims are affected?

    The fact is that both the Quran's author and Muhammad told Muslims to fast from when they see the whiteness of dawn to when it is dark. In some parts of the Arctic Circle, that is impossible.

    Furthermore, the Quran tells Muslims to refer to Muhammad and the Quran when they are in disagreement over anything. When there were disagreements among scholars in 2012 as to when people in the Arctic Circle should fast, according to the Quran's author, Muslims should have turned to the Quran and Sunnah for judgement. Yet neither Muhammad or the Quran's author came up with any advice for how Muslims living in the Arctic Circle in areas where the sun stays up for weeks on end, should fast.
    They have advice for travelers, pregnant women, nursing women, menstruating women, the sick, and the elderly. They have advice for what Muslims are to do when the moon is covered, and for what they are to do when the Dajjal will appear. Yet there is no advice for Muslims living in lands where the sun does not come down.

    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

     
    Islam is a religion of practicality, which is more than I can say about some other religions.  Under extenuating circumstances, the teachings of the Quran must be taken into account:

    "Ramadhan is the (month) in which was sent down the Qur'an, as a guide to mankind, also clear (Signs) for guidance and judgment (Between right and wrong). So every one of you who is present (at his home) during that month should spend it in fasting, but if any one is ill, or on a journey, the prescribed period (Should be made up) by days later. Allah intends every facility for you; He does not want to put you to difficulties. (He wants you) to complete the prescribed period, and to glorify Him in that He has guided you; and perchance ye shall be grateful." (Surah Al-Baqarah, 2:185)

    "
    So fear Allah as much as ye can; listen and obey and spend in charity for the benefit of your own soul and those saved from the covetousness of their own souls,- they are the ones that achieve prosperity." (Surah At-Taghabun, 64:16)   

    Allah knows best!


    2:185 is a reference to travelers and the sick. The tafsirs are very clear on that.

    Tafsir Al Jalalayn

    These days of, the month of Ramadān, wherein the Qur�ān was revealed, from the Preserved Tablet to the earthly heaven on the Night of Ordainment [laylat al-qadr] from Him, a guidance (hudan, �a guidance�, is a circumstantial qualifier), guiding away from error, for the people, and as clear proofs, lucid verses, of the Guidance, the rulings that guide to truth, and, of, the Criterion, that discriminates between truth and falsehood; So let those of you, who are present at the month, fast it and if any of you be sick, or if he be on a journey, then a number of other days (this [concession] has already been mentioned, but it is repeated here to avoid the mistaken impression that it has been abrogated by the comprehensive implication of man shahida, �who are present�). God desires ease for you, and desires not hardship for you, and for this reason He has permitted you the breaking of the fast during illness or travel, [this ease being] the very reason He has commanded you to fast; He supplements [the previous statement with]: and that you fulfil (read tukmilū or tukammilū) the number, of the fasting days of Ramadān, and magnify God, when you have completed them, for having guided you, for having directed you to the principal rites of His religion, and that you might be thankful, to God for this.

    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=185&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

    Tafsir Ibn Abbas

    (The month of Ramadan is) the month in (which was revealed the Qur'an) whereupon Gabriel brought down the entire Qur'an to the first heaven, dictated it to the scribes among the angels (al-safarah) and then took it down to Muhammad (pbuh) day after day, sometimes revealing to him just one, two or three verses and sometimes an entire surah, (a guidance for mankind) the Qur'an elucidates error to people, (and clear proofs of the guidance) in the matter of Religion, (and the Criterion (of right and wrong)) the lawful and the unlawful, the legal rulings, legal punishments and the steering away from doubtful matters. (And whoever of you is present) in settled areas and not travelling, (let him fast the month. And whoever of you is sick) during the month of Ramadan (or on a journey, (let him fast the same) number of days) at another time. (Allah desireth for your ease) He desires for you the dispensation of breaking the fast while on a journey; it is also said that this means: Allah wants you to break the fast when travelling; (He desireth not hardship for you) He does not desire for you the hardship of fasting while travelling; (and (He desireth) that ye should complete the period) that you should fast when you are back in your settlement the same number of days of fast you broke during your travel, (and that ye should magnify Allah for having guided you) as He guided you to His religion and legal dispensation, (and that peradventure ye may be thankful) so that you be thankful for His giving you this dispensation.

    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=185&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2


    (Allah intends for you ease, and He does not want to make things difficult for you. (He wants that you) must complete the same number (of days)) means: You were allowed to break the fast while ill, while traveling, and so forth, because Allah wanted to make matters easy for you. He only commanded you to make up for missed days so that you complete the days of one month.

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=251

    I agree with you however that Allah does know best.


    Posted By: islamispeace
    Date Posted: 15 June 2014 at 12:49pm
    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    For the simple reason that Muhammad told people what to do if the moon is covered up, but not if the sun is up all day. Both he and the Quran's author came up with many exemptions for different people, and as we shall see later on, with what Muslims should do in the end times. However, neither of them considered the possibility that there are some parts of the world where the sun does not go down for weeks at a time.


    First of all, you are not in a position to tell Muslims how they can interpret the rules set down in the Quran and Ahadith.  Second, as I explained in my post, general rules were set down to apply to extenuating circumstances.  The Quran is under no obligation to mention every single specific or possible scenario.  What it did is provide basic rules as well as exemptions. 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    That's nice, but not all Muslim scholars agree. In 2012 at least, some scholars told Muslims to fast according to Mecca time, and others according to local time, in places where the sun does set. There was a disagreement.


    That's nice, but this is a minor disagreement.  The point is that scholars are unanimous that in extenuating circumstances, people have options.  Just because they disagree on those options does not change the fact that they agree that there are options.  Your objection is without any merit.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    The Quran's author tells his followers, that if they are unable to come to an agreement of an issue, to refer it to him and Muhammad.

    4:59

    O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.

    Tafsir Al Jalalayn

    O you who believe, obey God, and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you, that is, rulers, when they command you to obey God and His Messenger. If you should quarrel, disagree, about anything, refer it to God, that is, to His Book, and the Messenger, while he lives, and thereafter [refer] to his Sunna: in other words examine these [disputes] with reference to these two [sources], if you believe in God and the Last Day; that, reference to the two [sources], is better, for you than quarrelling or [adhering to] personal opinions, and more excellent in interpretation, in the end.
    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=4&tAyahNo=59&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

    Tafsir Ibn Abbas


    (O ye who believe!) 'Uthman Ibn Talhah and his fellow believers. (Obey Allah) in that which He has commanded you, (and obey the messenger) in that which he commands you (and those of you who are in authority) the leaders of military expeditions; it also said that this means: the men of sacred knowledge; (and if ye have a dispute concerning any matter, refer it to Allah) to the Book of Allah (and the messenger) and to the practice of the Messenger (if you are (in truth) believers in Allah and the Last Day) resurrection after death. (That) referring the matter to the Book of Allah and the practice of His Messenger (is better and more seemly in the end).
    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=4&tAyahNo=59&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

    Tafsir Ibn Qathir

    ((And) if you differ in anything amongst yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger). Mujahid and several others among the Salaf said that the Ayah means, "(Refer) to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger.'' This is a command from Allah that whatever areas the people dispute about, whether major or minor areas of the religion, they are required to refer to the Qur'an and Sunnah for judgment concerning these disputes. In another Ayah, Allah said,

    (And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah). Therefore, whatever the Book and Sunnah decide and testify to the truth of, then it, is the plain truth. What is beyond truth, save falsehood This is why Allah said, u

    (if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day.) meaning, refer the disputes and conflicts that arise between you to the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger for judgment. Allah's statement,

    (if you believe in Allah and in the Last Day. ) indicates that those who do not refer to the Book and Sunnah for judgment in their disputes, are not believers in Allah or the Last Day. Allah said...

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=644&Itemid=59

    The scholars in 2012- and the Muslims who needed to know what to do during Ramadan- should have turned to the Quran and Sunnah for judgement. Both of these sources tell Muslims to fast from when they see the sun rise to when it sets.




    Its funny you always go to the three tafsirs above, as if they are only sources on the Quran's interpretation.  That just shows the limits of your research capabilities.  Of course, the tafsirs are correct, but I am just pointing out how you always predictably go to these tafsirs because that is all you really know.  

    At any rate, the scholars have indeed turned to the Quran and Sunnah, as I have already proven!  They based their opinions on the general rules set down in both sources.  Their opinions carry for more weight than the opinions of a non-Muslim with obvious biases and lack of knowledge on the subject. 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    This is in regards to daily prayer, not to fasting. And it is in regards to the End Times, not ordinary times.
      

    With this statement, you have shown your naivete as well as your general ignorance.  As any Muslim knows, the timing of the fast depends on the timing of the prayers.  The fast begins at the time of Fajr prayer and ends at the time of Maghrib prayer.  Anyone with even a basic knowledge of Islam knows this.

    Second, your ridiculous argument that the hadith referred to the "end times" is irrelevant since, no matter what time period it is referring to, it proves that Muslims are allowed to estimate the times of the prayers under extenuating circumstances, and scholars have referred to this hadith in that regard.     

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    What is interesting is that Muhammad was considerate enough to tell 7th century Muslims what to do when the Dajjal comes (and he hasn't came yet), but left nothing in terms of instruction for 20th century Muslims and Muslims in the first 14 years of the 21st.


    No, what's interesting is that you seem to want to ignore the fact that he made it clear to his followers that under extreme situations, estimating the time of prayer is allowed.  Hence, by default, estimating the time of the fast is also allowed, since the fast depends on the timing of the prayers. 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    However, Muhammad was not referring to ordinary days, but to the End Times... after the coming of the Dajjal. He also didn't say anything about how to fast when the sun stays up all day.


    Again, this is irrelevant.  What matters is that a general rule has been given.  Not one scholar has objected to using this hadith to prove that estimating prayer and fast times are allowed, simply on the grounds that it refers to "the End times". 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    In "most" locations, yes. But not all.


    So what?  The point is that in these locations, it is nevertheless possible to calculate the times, a point you seemed to be completely oblivious to when you first opened this thread. 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    Also, the Quran says nothing about being able to see or not see the "highest" or "lowest" point of the sun. Fasting starts when "the white thread of dawn becomes distinct to you from the black thread of night". Muhammad clarified that the black thread is a reference to the darkness of night and the white thread is a reference to the whiteness of dawn.


    How absurd!  The times of the prayers are based on the "highest" and "lowest" points of the sun!  For example, when the sun has passed its zenith (the highest point during the day), that is the time for Zuhr prayer.  When it has set, it is the time for Maghrib.  Obviously, if one cannot see these "points", then calculating them is an option.  Hence, by default, the same can be done for the fasts. 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    What difference does it make how many Muslims are affected?


    It makes a huge difference because it is an extremely rare situation.  Your argument that the Quran should have mentioned this extremely rare circumstance is ludicrous.  It's a slippery slope argument.  Next, you will be arguing that the Quran does not explain the rules for praying or fasting on airplanes!

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    The fact is that both the Quran's author and Muhammad told Muslims to fast from when they see the whiteness of dawn to when it is dark. In some parts of the Arctic Circle, that is impossible.


    And the fact is that these are general rules.  In exceptional circumstances, estimating the time is clearly allowed.  If you want to disagree, that is your problem.  It makes no matter to Muslims since we follow Islam, a religion of practicality.  Practical rules have been set down in the Quran and Ahadith.  Your personal opinions are irrelevant.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    Furthermore, the Quran tells Muslims to refer to Muhammad and the Quran when they are in disagreement over anything. When there were disagreements among scholars in 2012 as to when people in the Arctic Circle should fast, according to the Quran's author, Muslims should have turned to the Quran and Sunnah for judgement. Yet neither Muhammad or the Quran's author came up with any advice for how Muslims living in the Arctic Circle in areas where the sun stays up for weeks on end, should fast.
    They have advice for travelers, pregnant women, nursing women, menstruating women, the sick, and the elderly. They have advice for what Muslims are to do when the moon is covered, and for what they are to do when the Dajjal will appear. Yet there is no advice for Muslims living in lands where the sun does not come down.


    Answered above.  You weren't even aware of the scholarly views vis a vis the Dajjal hadith when you opened this thread.  Perhaps if you had done some objective research, you would have known.  Now that you do know, you resort to the typical special pleading that has unfortunately become a habit of yours. 

    Also, if you think about this objectively, you would realize that the situations in some places in the northern hemisphere have obvious implications for people's health.  The Quran allows for flexibility during the Ramadan fast for health reasons.  Obviously, if the fasting period in some northern locations would be months long, that would be a health hazard for the people living there.  Hence, the provisions on health grounds that the Quran allows can be applied in these cases.

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    2:185 is a reference to travelers and the sick. The tafsirs are very clear on that.

    Tafsir Al Jalalayn

    These days of, the month of Ramadān, wherein the Qur�ān was revealed, from the Preserved Tablet to the earthly heaven on the Night of Ordainment [laylat al-qadr] from Him, a guidance (hudan, �a guidance�, is a circumstantial qualifier), guiding away from error, for the people, and as clear proofs, lucid verses, of the Guidance, the rulings that guide to truth, and, of, the Criterion, that discriminates between truth and falsehood; So let those of you, who are present at the month, fast it and if any of you be sick, or if he be on a journey, then a number of other days (this [concession] has already been mentioned, but it is repeated here to avoid the mistaken impression that it has been abrogated by the comprehensive implication of man shahida, �who are present�). God desires ease for you, and desires not hardship for you, and for this reason He has permitted you the breaking of the fast during illness or travel, [this ease being] the very reason He has commanded you to fast; He supplements [the previous statement with]: and that you fulfil (read tukmilū or tukammilū) the number, of the fasting days of Ramadān, and magnify God, when you have completed them, for having guided you, for having directed you to the principal rites of His religion, and that you might be thankful, to God for this.

    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=185&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

    Tafsir Ibn Abbas

    (The month of Ramadan is) the month in (which was revealed the Qur'an) whereupon Gabriel brought down the entire Qur'an to the first heaven, dictated it to the scribes among the angels (al-safarah) and then took it down to Muhammad (pbuh) day after day, sometimes revealing to him just one, two or three verses and sometimes an entire surah, (a guidance for mankind) the Qur'an elucidates error to people, (and clear proofs of the guidance) in the matter of Religion, (and the Criterion (of right and wrong)) the lawful and the unlawful, the legal rulings, legal punishments and the steering away from doubtful matters. (And whoever of you is present) in settled areas and not travelling, (let him fast the month. And whoever of you is sick) during the month of Ramadan (or on a journey, (let him fast the same) number of days) at another time. (Allah desireth for your ease) He desires for you the dispensation of breaking the fast while on a journey; it is also said that this means: Allah wants you to break the fast when travelling; (He desireth not hardship for you) He does not desire for you the hardship of fasting while travelling; (and (He desireth) that ye should complete the period) that you should fast when you are back in your settlement the same number of days of fast you broke during your travel, (and that ye should magnify Allah for having guided you) as He guided you to His religion and legal dispensation, (and that peradventure ye may be thankful) so that you be thankful for His giving you this dispensation.

    http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=2&tAyahNo=185&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2


    (Allah intends for you ease, and He does not want to make things difficult for you. (He wants that you) must complete the same number (of days)) means: You were allowed to break the fast while ill, while traveling, and so forth, because Allah wanted to make matters easy for you. He only commanded you to make up for missed days so that you complete the days of one month.

    http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=251

       

    We already know the meaning of this verse, so there is no reason to list individual tafsirs on it.  But why did you ignore what Ibn Kathir stated earlier?

    "This Ayah indicates that ill persons who are unable to fast or fear harm by fasting, and the traveler, are all allowed to break the fast. When one does not fast in this case, he is obliged to fast other days instead." ( http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=253 - http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=253 )

    So obviously, the difficulty of fasting during the long time periods which occur in the northern areas of the earth would apply here since there would be a legitimate fear of "harm".  Moreover, taken together with the other evidence we have already seen, it is abundantly clear that the people living in these places have various options.  The best is to fast according to the time of the nearest country or location where these conditions are not present. 

    Originally posted by TG12345 TG12345 wrote:

    I agree with you however that Allah does know best.
      

    Indeed, which is why He has provided exceptions and flexibility to every rule.  All praise is due to Him!


    -------------
    Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)



    Posted By: Ron Webb
    Date Posted: 15 June 2014 at 3:34pm
    In TG12345's absence, I'd like to offer a few comments:
    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

    First of all, you are not in a position to tell Muslims how they can interpret the rules set down in the Quran and Ahadith.  Second, as I explained in my post, general rules were set down to apply to extenuating circumstances.  The Quran is under no obligation to mention every single specific or possible scenario.  What it did is provide basic rules as well as exemptions.

    I thought that everything was explained in detail in the Quran (6:114), and nothing was omitted (6:38).  Granted, not every scenario need be specifically mentioned, but surely every possible scenario should be accounted for.  As far as I can see, there is nothing that accounts for a scenario where the sun remains continuously below the horizon for weeks.

    Quote That's nice, but this is a minor disagreement.  The point is that scholars are unanimous that in extenuating circumstances, people have options.  Just because they disagree on those options does not change the fact that they agree that there are options.  Your objection is without any merit.

    I think the point is not that they disagree with TG12345.  The point is that they disagree with the Quran and the Hadith.  Who are these scholars that think they can amend the Quran as needed for unanticipated circumstances?

    It will be interesting when Muslims start participating in space travel (if they ever do).  How do you face Mecca in a spacecraft or space station that is rotating several times a second?

    Quote No, what's interesting is that you seem to want to ignore the fact that he made it clear to his followers that under extreme situations, estimating the time of prayer is allowed.  Hence, by default, estimating the time of the fast is also allowed, since the fast depends on the timing of the prayers.

    It's not a question of estimating the time of sunrise or sunset.  It's not a matter of merely not being able to see the event.  The fact is that the sun does not rise/set at all at these locations.  There is nothing to estimate.

    Quote It makes a huge difference because it is an extremely rare situation.  Your argument that the Quran should have mentioned this extremely rare circumstance is ludicrous.  It's a slippery slope argument.  Next, you will be arguing that the Quran does not explain the rules for praying or fasting on airplanes!

    It's not a rare situation to those who live there.  The fact is that one cannot live according to the rules of Islam above the Arctic Circle.  Maybe that's Allah's intention -- maybe nobody should be living there.  If so, do your scholars think they can overrule Allah by inventing rules not in the Quran?

    Quote Also, if you think about this objectively, you would realize that the situations in some places in the northern hemisphere have obvious implications for people's health.  The Quran allows for flexibility during the Ramadan fast for health reasons.  Obviously, if the fasting period in some northern locations would be months long, that would be a health hazard for the people living there.  Hence, the provisions on health grounds that the Quran allows can be applied in these cases.

    That's a good suggestion.  (I wonder why your scholars didn't think of that?)  However,  if that is the case, then Muslims would presumably be forbidden to fast at all during Ramadan, not given liberty to invent fictitious sunrise/set times; and they would have to make up the missed days afterwards.


    -------------
    Addeenul �Aql � Religion is intellect.


    Posted By: islamispeace
    Date Posted: 15 June 2014 at 4:42pm
    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    I thought that everything was explained in detail in the Quran (6:114), and nothing was omitted (6:38).  Granted, not every scenario need be specifically mentioned, but surely every possible scenario should be accounted for.  As far as I can see, there is nothing that accounts for a scenario where the sun remains continuously below the horizon for weeks.


    You seem to be contradicting yourself.  First you say that "not every scenario need be specifically mentioned" but then you say "surely every possible scenario should be accounted for".  What's the difference? 

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    I think the point is not that they disagree with TG12345.  The point is that they disagree with the Quran and the Hadith.  Who are these scholars that think they can amend the Quran as needed for unanticipated circumstances?
     

    I wasn't referring to whether they disagreed with TG12345.  Why would that matter to me?

    The scholars were not "disagree[ing] with the Quran and the Hadith".  In fact, they specifically based their views on both, as we have seen already.

    Finally, since you feel you are in a position to question who these scholars think they are "that they can amend the Quran...", it would be equally fair to ask who you think you are to question Islamic scholars for interpreting the Quran based on new and "unanticipated circumstances"?  You are not even a Muslim, so what difference does it make to you how Muslims interpret the rules of their religion with regard to fasting?  In any case, as we have already seen, none of the scholars were basing their views on their own opinions but rather used the Quran and AHadith to come to their conclusions.

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    It will be interesting when Muslims start participating in space travel (if they ever do).  How do you face Mecca in a spacecraft or space station that is rotating several times a second?


    Simply facing toward the earth would be sufficient.  It is a person's intentions which count, especially when control of the situation is out of the person's hands. 

    By the way, Muslims have been participating in space travel already and have considered the issue of praying in space. 
    http://muslimvillage.com/2012/02/16/19699/muslim-astronauts-miracle-call-to-prayer-in-space/ -
    http://muslimvillage.com/2012/02/16/19699/muslim-astronauts-miracle-call-to-prayer-in-space/

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    It's not a question of estimating the time of sunrise or sunset.  It's not a matter of merely not being able to see the event.  The fact is that the sun does not rise/set at all at these locations.  There is nothing to estimate.


    Of course there is.  Even though the sun does not rise/set, does not mean it does not have high and low points.  Those points can be calculated. 

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    It's not a rare situation to those who live there.  The fact is that one cannot live according to the rules of Islam above the Arctic Circle.  Maybe that's Allah's intention -- maybe nobody should be living there.  If so, do your scholars think they can overrule Allah by inventing rules not in the Quran?
        

    My point is that this situation did not even arise until quite recently.  Hence, it is a "rare situation".  Not only that, but if affects a very small number of people. 

    And to repeat what I said before, "[my] scholars" have not "overruled" Allah at all since they have based their views on the general guidelines outlined in the Quran and the Sunnah.  In fact, it seems that some non-Muslims think they have the moral authority to overrule Muslims and offer their own "opinions" on matters that don't even concern them.  Now that's a sight!  Of course, in the post-9/11 world, there have already been many self-proclaimed non-Muslim "scholars" who have decided that they know best about what Islam teaches, so I am certainly not surprised!  LOL

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    That's a good suggestion.  (I wonder why your scholars didn't think of that?)  However,  if that is the case, then Muslims would presumably be forbidden to fast at all during Ramadan, not given liberty to invent fictitious sunrise/set times; and they would have to make up the missed days afterwards.


    Um, they have.  Why else do you think they didn't tell these people to fast continuously from sunrise to sunset, regardless of how long it was? Confused  It's an obvious health issue!

    Making up the fasts afterwards is also an option.  That is the point.  Islam provides a lot of flexibility, more so than many people are willing to admit. 


    -------------
    Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)



    Posted By: Ron Webb
    Date Posted: 16 June 2014 at 10:23am

    Originally posted by islamispeace islamispeace wrote:

    You seem to be contradicting yourself.  First you say that "not every scenario need be specifically mentioned" but then you say "surely every possible scenario should be accounted for".  What's the difference?

     
    One can account for all possible scenarios without specifically mentioning each.  For instance, one can say "All men must fast", without specifying that Canadians must fast and Americans must fast and Mexicans must fast...
     
    Quote The scholars were not "disagree[ing] with the Quran and the Hadith".  In fact, they specifically based their views on both, as we have seen already.

    According to Muhammad, the fast ends when the sun sets.  Anyone who says they can break their fast while the sun is still above the horizon is contradicting Muhammad.

    Quote Finally, since you feel you are in a position to question who these scholars think they are "that they can amend the Quran...", it would be equally fair to ask who you think you are to question Islamic scholars for interpreting the Quran based on new and "unanticipated circumstances"?  You are not even a Muslim, so what difference does it make to you how Muslims interpret the rules of their religion with regard to fasting?

    It makes no difference to me, but I think it ought to matter to you.  The Quran says to obey the Prophet (which IMHO is problematic in itself), but it says nothing about obeying "scholars".  It seems to me that Muslims have drifted into shirk, in so many ways.

    Quote Simply facing toward the earth would be sufficient.  It is a person's intentions which count, especially when control of the situation is out of the person's hands.

    By the way, Muslims have been participating in space travel already and have considered the issue of praying in space.

    http://muslimvillage.com/2012/02/16/19699/muslim-astronauts-miracle-call-to-prayer-in-space/ - http://muslimvillage.com/2012/02/16/19699/muslim-astronauts-miracle-call-to-prayer-in-space/

    Thanks for the link.  Yes, I don't know why I didn't consider the Russian space program.  However, I had in mind a more long-term residential space station, one which spins to simulate gravity.  There would be no direction that faces Mecca for more than a couple of seconds.  I imagine the Muslim residents would simply pick a direction relative to the space station itself, but the standard rules of Islam would offer no guidance.

    Quote Of course there is.  Even though the sun does not rise/set, does not mean it does not have high and low points.  Those points can be calculated.

    The high and low points would give you midday and midnight, not sunrise and sunset.  I don't see how that helps.

    Quote My point is that this situation did not even arise until quite recently.  Hence, it is a "rare situation".  Not only that, but if affects a very small number of people.

    It seems to me that a religion that doesn't account for all situations, however rare, would by definition be imperfect.

    Quote Um, they have.  Why else do you think they didn't tell these people to fast continuously from sunrise to sunset, regardless of how long it was? Confused  It's an obvious health issue!

    Making up the fasts afterwards is also an option.  That is the point.  Islam provides a lot of flexibility, more so than many people are willing to admit.

    In some cases at least, making up the fast afterwards is the only option.  In http://www.grisefiord.ca/eng/land.html - Grise Fiord , for instance, the sun rises in May and doesn't set until August.  That's reality.  Nothing in the Quran or Hadith say you can make up your own sunrise/set times if you don't like the real ones.  It's hard to argue that the sun has set if you're looking right at it.


    -------------
    Addeenul �Aql � Religion is intellect.


    Posted By: islamispeace
    Date Posted: 17 June 2014 at 1:23pm
    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    One can account for all possible scenarios without specifically mentioning each.  For instance, one can say "All men must fast", without specifying that Canadians must fast and Americans must fast and Mexicans must fast...


    But then this surely applies to the issue at hand.  The Quran and Sunnah make it clear that under extreme situations (without mentioning every single situation), estimating the time of prayer and (by default) fasting, is allowed.   

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    It makes no difference to me, but I think it ought to matter to you.  The Quran says to obey the Prophet (which IMHO is problematic in itself), but it says nothing about obeying "scholars".  It seems to me that Muslims have drifted into shirk, in so many ways.


    Well then you should probably read the Quran before making inaccurate statements.  The Quran states:

    "O ye who believe! obey Allah, and obey the Messenger, and those charged with authority among you. If ye differ in anything among yourselves, refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if ye do believe in Allah and the Last Day: That is best, and most suitable for final determination." (Suran An-Nisa, 4:59)

    So, the ridiculous claim that listening to scholars somehow constitutes "shirk" is simply not true.  Of course, if any "scholar" were to tell Muslims to disobey Allah and His Messenger, Muslims would be under no obligation to obey such a scholar, but as we have seen already, the scholarly opinions regarding the issue of fasting are based on the general rules in the Quran and Sunnah. 

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    Thanks for the link.  Yes, I don't know why I didn't consider the Russian space program.  However, I had in mind a more long-term residential space station, one which spins to simulate gravity.  There would be no direction that faces Mecca for more than a couple of seconds.  I imagine the Muslim residents would simply pick a direction relative to the space station itself, but the standard rules of Islam would offer no guidance.


    Actually they would.  I don't know why you keep making inaccurate statements about the "rules of Islam" when you obviously don't know much about them.  This is why I stated before how, in the post 9/11 world, it seems there are all sorts of non-Muslims who have made themselves into "experts" on Islam but who don't know much, if anything, about it.

    It has been established in the Sunnah that, depending on the situation, a person who was riding on an animal did not necessarily have to face the Qiblah if the situation did not allow it.  For example, there is the "Salat al-Khauf" (Prayer of Fear), which is made when one is traveling in a dangerous situation and the time for an obligatory prayer comes. 

    "Narrated Nafi': Whenever 'Abdullah bin 'Umar was asked about Salat-al-Khauf (i.e. prayer of fear) he said, "The Imam comes forward with a group of people and leads them in a one Rak'a prayer while another group from them who has not prayed yet, stay between the praying group and the enemy. When those who are with the Imam have finished their one Rak'a, they retreat and take the positions of those who have not prayed but they will not finish their prayers with Taslim. Those who have not prayed, come forward to offer a Rak'a with the Imam (while the first group covers them from the enemy). Then the Imam, having offered two Rakat, finishes his prayer. Then each member of the two groups offer the second Rak'a alone after the Imam has finished his prayer. Thus each one of the two groups will have offered two Rakat. But if the fear is too great, they can pray standing on their feet or riding on their mounts, facing the Qibla or not." Nafi added: I do not think that 'Abdullah bin 'Umar narrated this except from Allah's Apostle." (Sahih Bukhari, Book 60, Number 59)

    It is also known that the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) used to offer the optional prayers while mounted on an animal regardless of the direction he was facing, but when it was time for one of the obligatory prayers, he would dismount and face Mecca.  But again, in times of danger or fear, it was allowed to pray on the animal regardless of the direction.  As I said before, it is the intention which counts.  It is stated in a hadith:

    "Narrated 'Umar bin Al-Khattab: I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "The reward of deeds depends upon the intentions and every person will get the reward according to what he has intended." (Sahih Bukhari, Book 1, Number 1)

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    The high and low points would give you midday and midnight, not sunrise and sunset.  I don't see how that helps.


    Well, when the sun is past its highest point, that is the time for Zuhr prayer.  So again, it is possible to calculate the times.  Also, the 5 daily prayers are to be made in a 24-hour period and given the precedence already established by the ahadith about estimating prayer times, it is not at all as big an issue as you or TG12345 are making it out to be.   

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    It seems to me that a religion that doesn't account for all situations, however rare, would by definition be imperfect.
     

    It seems to me that this is just a slippery slope argument.  Moreover, the rules of Islam allow for flexibility to pretty much every situation, as we have seen.

    Originally posted by Ron Webb Ron Webb wrote:

    In some cases at least, making up the fast afterwards is the only option.  In http://www.grisefiord.ca/eng/land.html - Grise Fiord , for instance, the sun rises in May and doesn't set until August.  That's reality.  Nothing in the Quran or Hadith say you can make up your own sunrise/set times if you don't like the real ones.  It's hard to argue that the sun has set if you're looking right at it.


    We already went over this.  Estimating the fasting times or going by the times of the nearest country where such conditions are not present are options as well, so I have no idea where you are getting the idea that making up the fast is the "only" option.  It is certainly one option but not the only one.  Yet another option is to feed poor people.


    -------------
    Say: "Truly, my prayer and my service of sacrifice, my life and my death, are (all) for Allah, the Cherisher of the Worlds. (Surat al-Anaam: 162)




    Print Page | Close Window

    Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
    Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net