Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) in the Bible |
Post Reply | Page <12345 17> |
Author | |
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What is written above seems to be quite right and true. That is what should be the belief of all muslims too. But the Muslims are not required to act according to Torah (BibleOT). They have their own revealed book which is good enough to follow. By following their own book Quran, the Muslims should never harm the interests of the Jews or the christians. The apostle of Allah did well to deal with the problem at the hands of the jews that he tried to solve their problem from their own book. That was very good. It should be like that. Good for healthy living. There should be no fight or hurtful words or abuse of the sacred scripture of any denomination except by what is actually present in ones own books. I feel that the above post is vey good, whatever the result. |
|
mochiah
Senior Member Joined: 05 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yunus 10:94 ����� ����� ��� ����� ������� ���������� �������� ��������� ��������� ����������� ���������� ��� �������� ������ ������ �������� ��� �������� ����� ���������� ���� ��������������
Al-Baqara 2:136 �������� ������� �������� ����� ������� ��������� ����� ������� ����� ������������ �������������� ���������� ����������� ������������ ����� ������� ������ �������� ����� ������� ������������� ��� ���������� ��� ��������� ������ ������ ��������� �������� ���� �����������
Al-Ankaboot 29:46 ����� ����������� ������ ���������� ������ ��������� ���� �������� ������ ��������� �������� �������� ��������� ������� ��������� ������� ��������� ��������� ���������� ����������� ������������ ������� �������� ���� �����������
Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 38 (Kitab al Hudud, ie. Prescribed Punishments), Number 4434:
|
|
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
There is a good debate going on here. Are you saying then that it was out of sheer spite that they rejected the claims of Muhammad? That seems to be true. The reason being, what they understood (or more properly misunderstood) from Deut 18:18. The Jews sincerely believed that THAT PROPHET will be raised from the children of Israel (Jacob a.s.). At the time that Muhammad arrived, the Jews were still believing it to be like that. Even though it was written that That prophet will be raised from the brethren of the Israelis. Thathe willbe the like of Moses a.s. Some people cannot just believe the blessing of Allah to be universal. That God is the God of all creation. The mistake of the Jews of Arabia was not their own. It was the result of the changes made in the scripture by the elders of the Jews hundreds of years before. There is a saying "That is what comes out of being a Yankee doodle." So that is what happened here too. The scripture had been (not fully) modified. The line of truth was lost. there was complete misbehaviour amongst the Jews. Otherwise, why would Jesus have to come to them to correct their mistakes. The Jews at that time were so misguided that they decided to kill Jesus. That is the height of ignorance that one tries to kill some one who had come to their aid. It happens with all nations. the christians also could not remain on the right lines. Do not think that the Muslims remained on the right lines. They have a perfect book. But they do not all understand it. they do not practice it. So, it is with all nations that with the time, the guidance disappears and falsehood sets in. In the present times, the Jews have improved somehow, if not spiritually then at least in all other matters of good sense. |
|
Doo-bop
Senior Member Joined: 04 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 531 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
Sawtul Khilafah
Senior Member Joined: 20 July 2006 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes it is and I have taken it from YOUNG LITERAL TRANSLATION |
|
mochiah
Senior Member Joined: 05 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 192 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What you are posting is not what is written:
|
|
Sawtul Khilafah
Senior Member Joined: 20 July 2006 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 623 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
"Those who follow the apostle, the unlettered prophet, whom they find mentioned in their own (scriptures) - in the Law and the Gospel......" --Quran 7: 157
The correct translation for the Arabic word "ummi" (unlettered) used in the verse is said to be GENTILE (non-Israelite). But the manner in which this expression is thrown into this verse and the next raises the conjecture, which with us amounts to an opinion, that this appellation came originally from the Jews, who used it in expressing their contempt for the Gentile prophet, the term Ummi meaning Gentile in the technical sense. (Wherry, A Comprehensive Commentary on the Qur'an, Vol. 2, p. 237). Another writer says much the same thing: Postulating that prophecy was the exclusive privilege of Israel, they refused to recognise the claims of the omni, 'gentile' prophet. (Lammens, Islam: Beliefs and Institutions, p. 28). Even Jewish Rabbis who have studied the Quran say this:
|
|
minuteman
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2007 Status: Offline Points: 1642 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes Doo bop, I have now understood your point about the mentioning of the apostle in the scriptures. But some other time, we may write about it. Thanks. It is now understood. |
|
Post Reply | Page <12345 17> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |