WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ 911 Evidence Suppressed

rami wrote: Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem You percieve his account as wild while if you invetigate the information on that site you will see it is consistant with the evidence presented and well within the bounds of posibility.

That is your view, and you are welcome to it.

Islam is relavent to disagreements themself and anything relating to muslims. the argument that my post should be removed as they are inflamitory to some people is the whole issue according to you well it is not.

You have every right to post this stuff. No one is suggesting it should be removed but people should have the right to counter it without being subjected to thinly veiled threats of banning particularly your mentioning of the fate of Rehmat (Who was I believe, banned for spamming the forum with anti-Semetic and racist posts).

I posted the article and you are the one being inflamed by it, you wish me to remain silent not the otherway around.

See above.

Bruce was posting propaganda pieces for the U.S government much of which was ofensive to muslims as well as excessively arguing. This discussion is anything but civil and as such moral standards must be upheld.

Anyone here has the right to counter fellow members posts, that is what a discussion forum is all about, isn't it?, Of course it should be conducted in a civilised manner.

Please point me towards the non muslim posting theories i began this post

Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "non muslim posting theories", but perhaps it would help if you did a little research before pasting in some of the more exotic stuff that you post. For example, the article about Jews being tipped off before the recent bombings in Jordan. Which with a little prior investigation would have shown it for what it was, a completely false story. These false stories quite often end up as conspiracy theories that get believed by the terminally gullible and recorded as hard fact in the annals of propagandist history. Just take a look at all the online trash that was spewed out after 9/11.

and you are calling it a wild theory do i have to remind you whose side you are on?

I don't know what you mean by this Rami, but for the record, I'm on the side of moderation and objectivity.

rami wrote: Bi ismillahir rahmanir raheem Do you recal Rehmat and his posts and was done to them? this remains an Islamic forum whether you like it or not i sugest you leave if you do not feel you are being treated fairly.

I'm no expert, but I don't believe that Islam condones the spreading of wild conspiracy theories. It probably doesn't make a specific pronouncement on the subject, but I doubt if such behaviour would be considered desirable by most adherents of Islam.

Anyhow, the fact that this an Islamic forum shouldn't really be relevant in the context of disagreements about the promotion of conspiracy theories on this site. If you are suggesting that non-Muslims should remain silent on the posting of such theories, then you have the right as a moderator to remove our posts or even ban us, but if you do, don't be surprised if fellow members from whatever faith, question the motives of such actions.

Rami wrote:

This is an Islamic forum and Islamic moral Guidelines apply you may not be aware of them but i am not a teacher of Islam to inform you of the particulars my self.

Perhaps the moral guidelines of this forum should also extend to discouraging the spreading of  far-fetched, conspiracy theories. Because this type of material will obviously receive the deserved scrutiny of those not so easily seduced by such fantastically imaginative drivel.