IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Holy Gospel did not evolve!  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The Holy Gospel did not evolve!

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7071727374>
Author
Message
Larry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 16 April 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 632
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Larry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 1:37am
Ahmadi Muslim,

   You make a distinction between "Islam's God" and refer to Judaism and Christianity as "man-made" religions. This is the point that I have made repeatedly, that, for all the talk about "People of the Book," in reality the "God" of Islam is NOT the same God as that of the "People of the Book" Jews and Christians (and Sabeans, who were pagans), thanks for clearing that point up.

   You call Islam "the original religion of Abraham." But the Jews and Christians recognized Abraham as one of the first Jewish Patriarchs millenia, in the case of Jews and centuries, in the case of Christians, before Islam ever existed. Also, "Abraham" or "Ibrahim" are not Arabic names, the true Arabic form of Abraham is "Abu Raheem."

   For Islam to conveniently say that it was the "original" religion of God is simply a statement with no basis in fact. This historical "revisionism" is a common characteristic of Islam and Muslims. Show me ANY historical proof, by ANY ancient writer or historian, outside of Islam and the Qur'an, that shows that Islam or Muhammad existed prior to the 7th century C.E.

   I can show historical written ancient works, such as those of Flavius Josephus and many Roman writers and historians, that show that Judaism has been a faith for more than three thousand years and that Christianity has been a faith for more than two thousand years.

   You continually use the Qur'an to make your points, but the Qur'an is not a "source" that is accepted by historians in relation to which religions were the earliest and which came later. Just as it would be if I used the Bible as the source material to prove that Christianity is the only "true" religion. But there are many widely-accepted ancient sources outside of the Bible that back up the statements and beliefs of both the Jews and Christians.

   And I repeat that the "prophet" Muhammad himself never made ANY "prophecies" that were later fulfilled after the writing of the Qur'an. This is the standard for true prophets of God in the Old Testament or Torah. And this is a primary reason why Jews and Christians reject Islam as the "true" religion of God.

Larry



Edited by Larry - 12 September 2012 at 2:39am
Back to Top
Friendship View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 24 August 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 884
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Friendship Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 1:59am
Assalamu alaika Larry.

You said: Christians cannot accept Islam because it denies that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. The problem many Muslims have with this view is that they see Jesus Christ as separate from God and not an extension of God Himself.

My Response: First of all Muhammad never explained defined Islam as a system of life peculiar to him sent to mankind from Allah.
Secondly: It is not only the followers of Muhammad who rejected the idea of Jesus the son of Maryam is the son of Allah. The followers of Muhammad are the only followers of Islam who respect Jesus (Isa bin Maryam) and purified him. Carefully read your Quran 43:79-89.
Thirdly: There is no where in the New Testament where logically, and according to theme of speech indicates Jesus addressing himself as the son of Allah. I asked you to comment and explain to me the difference between RED SELF PRONOUNCING RED LETTER OF THE BIBLE FROM BLACK LETTER. You have not yet responded and no christian has ever given me a sensible explanation. Why is it now the Bible does not contain the self pronouncing red letter.
Forthly. There is no where in the Old Testament (The Message sent to Moses) a single clause or word leading to that. Larry! Today I see rainbow in the sky only during the summer. This rainbow began during the time of Noah. No one knows how long ago. When then did Allah began having spouses?
Finally, Larry if you believe in peace, that form of peace was achieved in Medina after the tribes appointed Muhammad as their political leader. The Levi clan of the children of Israel were participants. The followers of Christ also in Najran accepted the leadership of Muhammad. There is no second alternative. Conclusively, Muhammad was logically that Messiah! But you will never agree.

Friendship.


Back to Top
Larry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 16 April 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 632
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Larry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 2:07am
Hasan,

   You are the one who brought up the "Santa Claus thingy," so don't act like that I am trying to "divert" attention from other things.

   And yes, the Bible was written by 66 different authors, you seem to think that because the Qur'an was "written" by one person, that that is what makes it the "true" holy text. But there are no source materials for the Qur'an because any previous writings and sources that were in it prior to Uthman's "standardized" copy were completely destroyed by Muslim authorities, which made authenticating the text impossible.

   The Bible has a coherent form, that moves from the beginning to the end that is logical, historically accurate (There are many ancient sources that back up the Bible's historical writings), contains extensive geneaologies of Old Testament Patriarchs and prophets, etc. The amazing thing about the Bible is that with 66 different writers the form, cohesiveness and linear structure, along with a high degree of accuracy and agreement between the different writers is remarkable.

   The Qur'an has no logical form or commentary, it is simply put together by using the lengths of the various "chapters" to determine its form and it is repetitive, has many discrepancies (one, in particular, the different number of days that God used to create the world), is verbose and the style and content changes from Muhammad's time in Mecca and then later in Medina, and includes in many places, Muhammad, his immmediate family, his allies, his enemies, etc. Why would revelations from God Himself concern Muhammad, his personal life, his actions, family and financial details that say how much money the "prophet" and his family are entitled to from any spoils of war or other "income."

   There are also variant copies of the Qur'an, namely, those of Ibn Masud, who does not include Chapters 1, 113 and 114, and Ubay B Ka'ab who has two additional chapters, Surah al-Khal and Surah al-Afd, not found in Uthman's astandardized version.

   Sorry, but I simply don't buy it. I am very happy to say that I have complete faith in the Bible and in it's prophecies, histories, geneaologies, poetry, musical forms, and message. Whether or not you accept that is irrelevant to me.

   There is an interesting article concerning the contents, histories, stories, form, etc. of the Qur'an at;

   http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/quran.htm

Larry

Edited by Larry - 12 September 2012 at 2:36am
Back to Top
Larry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 16 April 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 632
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Larry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 2:53am
Originally posted by Friendship Friendship wrote:

Assalamu alaika Larry.You said: Christians cannot accept Islam because it denies that Jesus Christ is
the Son of God. The problem many Muslims have with this view is that
they see Jesus Christ as separate from God and not an extension of God

   That is the problem, Muslims see Jesus Christ as simply human with no divine nature.


Himself.My Response: First of all Muhammad never explained defined Islam as a system of life peculiar to him sent to mankind from Allah.Secondly: It is not only the followers of Muhammad who rejected the idea of Jesus the son of Maryam is the son of Allah. The followers of Muhammad are the only followers of Islam who respect Jesus (Isa bin Maryam) and purified him. Carefully read your Quran 43:79-89.

   I don't use a Qur'an.

Thirdly: There is no where in the New Testament where logically, and according to theme of speech indicates Jesus addressing himself as the son of Allah. I asked you to comment and explain to me the difference between RED SELF PRONOUNCING RED LETTER OF THE BIBLE FROM BLACK LETTER. You have not yet responded and no christian has ever given me a sensible explanation. Why is it now the Bible does not contain the self pronouncing red letter.

   There are numerous places in the New Testament (red Lettering included) where Jesus says that he is the Son of God. But Muslims reject ANY of those statements as "corrupt."

   Forthly. There is no where in the Old Testament (The Message sent to Moses) a single clause or word leading to that. Larry! Today I see rainbow in the sky only during the summer. This rainbow began during the time of Noah. No one knows how long ago.

   There were plenty of "rainbows" before Noah. They are not "holy" things, they are simply the result of water mist in the air coupled with sunlight, which has a prismatic effect that is seen in rainbows.

When then did Allah began having spouses?

   Who was "Maryam's spouse and who was the father of Jesus?"

Finally, Larry if you believe in peace, that form of peace was achieved in Medina after the tribes appointed Muhammad as their political leader. The Levi clan of the children of Israel were participants.

   The statement that the "Levi clan" somehow appointed Muhammad as their "political leader" is odd to say the least. The Banu Qurayza tribe sure didn't "appoint" Muhammad as their leader either (and 800 of them were beheaded by their "political leaders."

The followers of Christ also in Najran accepted the leadership of Muhammad.

   There is a difference between "political leaders" and true prophets of God. Did the Christians in Najran have a choice whether to accept Muhammad as their "leader?"

   There is no second alternative. Conclusively, Muhammad was logically that Messiah! But you will never agree.Friendship.

   How you figure that Muhammad was the "Messiah" is bizarre. The Qur'an refers to Jesus as the Messiah, not Muhammad.



Edited by Larry - 12 September 2012 at 2:58am
Back to Top
Larry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male
Joined: 16 April 2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 632
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Larry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 3:05am
Friendship,

   You did not comment on my post that showed that there are non-Arabic words in the Qur'an. Do you have an answer as to why, since supposedly there is a pure Arabic Qur'an in heaven that is identical to the Qur'an here on earth?

Larry
Back to Top
Caringheart View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 March 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 2991
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Caringheart Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 11:14am
Friendship,

! Did you just say that Muhammad was Messiah?  Was that an error?


Medina when Muhammad arrived was actually a place called Yathrib.

The oasis of Yathrib had been settled by Arab Jewish tribes as early as the Roman period. In the early centuries of the Common Era its population was primarily Jewish.  (http://www.pbs.org/wnet/heritage/episode3/atlas/map2.html#)


It warrants some serious study.  There is much to be learned.

http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/xstnc-7.html    
      (A very good well-balanced debate)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medina)

http://www.freejesus.net/home/viewtopic.php?t=5160&sid=a48f19473d2ae84a4f97a920339a9997



Edited by Caringheart - 12 September 2012 at 11:34am
Back to Top
Friendship View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 24 August 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 884
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Friendship Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 2:04pm
Assalamu alaika Larry.

Yes indeed, the source of Qur'an meaning to 'read' and to 'compare' is derived from the languages of Jurhum and that spoken in Palestine up to the time the mother of Ishmael left Palestine. Let us learn from the philologists. There are words that are spoken from the neighbouring countries like Muhsanat, Kahanama Iranian word changed to Jahannama, Ra'ina a Hebraic word changed to 'unzurna' etc. I do not speak Hebrew but there are a lot of words that have a common root with Arabic.
All verses starting with prophetic say, are Arabiciseds. The medinan Arabs did not know the meaning of the abbreviated alphabets unlike the Levi clan. So when the alphabets for example  A-L-M were revealed, their leader came to the holy Apostle and said your kingdom is going to last for 41 years for A=30, L=10, M=1 (or in a reverse form). Muhammad did not argue with him.  Understand that whenever the holy Apostle addressed those with Islam before him, they never disputed with him.
Larry! There is inconsistency between what you claim to profess with that in the time of Muhammad. Those Christians and Jews in his time never denied his Message. Now you cannot say today their Torah and Bible were adulterated and that what is with you today is the authentic one. Don't be biased please and use your faculty to understand Allah. Be independent and a slave!
I hope I have answered you. I am waiting for your answer also.

Friendship.



Back to Top
Friendship View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 24 August 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 884
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Friendship Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 September 2012 at 2:21pm
Assalamu alaika Larry.

I am regretting having a discourse with you. You are not sincere and you do not fear God. I am not here to joke.
Tell me the book and the chapter according to your claim: There are numerous places in the New Testament (red Lettering included) where Jesus says that he is the Son of God. But Muslims reject ANY of those statements as "corrupt." Give me the addition. My addition is the King James version translated from the original tongues, Longmeadow and printed in the USA. Copyright 1984, 1977 by Thomas Nelson Inc.

You said: I don't use a Qur'an. But you said that you read the Qur'an!
You said: There were plenty of "rainbows" before Noah.
If you are quoting from the Bible then you are telling lies.
You said: They are not "holy" things, they are simply the result of water mist in the air coupled with sunlight, which has a prismatic effect that is seen in rainbows.
Response. I am older than you. I learned that in my physics class 52 years ago. You have nothing to show me on that.
You said: The statement that the "Levi clan" somehow appointed Muhammad as their "political leader" is odd to say the least. The Banu Qurayza tribe sure didn't "appoint" Muhammad as their leader either (and 800 of them were beheaded by their "political leaders."
Response: This shows that you are ignorant of the Torah.
Larry, I will never discuss with you for you are not intelligent.

Friendship.



Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 7071727374>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.