Is the Bible Still the Word of God? |
Post Reply | Page <1 2122232425 31> |
Author | ||||||||||
Andalus
Moderator Group Joined: 12 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
Edited by Andalus - 21 September 2009 at 9:56am |
||||||||||
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/ http://www.pt-go.com/ |
||||||||||
Andalus
Moderator Group Joined: 12 October 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
When I am talking about the Bible, I am talking about a book which included Old and new testaments and some which all of them were written by the apostles of Jesus Christ: This still means nothing. If you would take a look at the link http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Canon/ You will see a list and dates of a trail of confusion. This confusion is based upon the fact that your own doctors have been chasing their tails for two thousand years trying to define a �bible�. The next link clearly demonstrates the confusion is �mass� confusion when you take the OT and NT into account with respect to the time before and after Islam. http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Canon/canonages.html Keep in mind that it was not until the last few centuries that your faith has come closer to agreement to what makes up your holy book. Even now you have some who want nothing but the KJV as the official version of Gods word in English.
The New Testament Autographs 45- 95 A.D. The New Testament was written in Greek. The Pauline Epistles, the Gospel of Mark, the Gospel of Luke, and the book of Acts are all dated from 45-63 A.D. The Gospel of John and the Revelation may have been written as late as 95 A.D. A dating alone does not necessarily give us the conclusion your source is trying to imply. As an example, Galatians is dated about 50 CE. Wow! We have a letter from Paul that gets us to a time close to Jesus! Or do we. Christians love to brag and boast about MS dating, but usually much is left out and I also believe their theologians who know better mislead their flocks. Galatians is dated to about 50 CE, the problem is that the earliest MS, P46, dates to 200 CE. That is 15 decades, 150 years, between the time the letter is dated, and an actual copy of the letter that remains. So we have a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a letter that Paul wrote. Keep in mind I am not addressing the theological issues, only the notion if a dated MS and what it means and does not mean. So when you open your bible and read Galatians, you are not actually reading what Paul wrote, you are reading a second century document that represents a transmission of copies that extend back 150 years earlier. There was no method for transmission, there was no critical methodology for preserving Paul�s word in any accurate way, there is no way to reconstruct what the copy our MS came from looked like. The point is, no one can say, with any certainty, if Galatians is a word for word accurate representation of what Paul wrote. Christian literature is full of accounts of people falsifying accounts and writing in other people�s names. In fact, half of Paul�s work is now hotly contested as forgeries.
Manuscripts There are over 5,600 early Greek Manuscripts of the New Testament that are still in existence. The oldest manuscripts were written on papyrus and the later manuscripts were written on leather called parchment. The problem with this claim is that the complete MSS do not get you any closer than 400 years to late second temple.
� 125 A.D. The New Testament manuscript which dates most closely to the original autograph was copied around 125 A.D, within 35 years of the original. It is designated "p 52" and contains a small portion of John 18. (The "p" stands for papyrus.) P52 is not a NT MS, it is a fragment. http://www.kchanson.com/ANCDOCS/greek/johnpap.html You are still in the same position as with Galatians.
� 200 A.D. Bodmer p 66 a papyrus manuscript which contains a large part of the Gospel of John. I would not say a large part, it is also segments, (John 1:1-6:11; 6:35-14:26, 29-30; 15:2-26; 16:2-4, 6-7; 16:10-20:20, 22-23; 20:25-21:9, 12, 17) and does not have the story of the adulteress. Now that is a bit strange. http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Mss/P66.html
� 200 A.D. Chester Beatty Biblical papyrus p 46 contains the Pauline Epistles and Hebrews. Incomplete, and we are still back to my example of Galatians.
� 225 A.D. Bodmer Papyrus p 75 contains the Gospels of Luke and John. (Luke 3:18-22; 3:33 - 4:2; 4:34 - 5:10; 5:37 - 6:4; 6:10 - 7:32, 35-39, 41-43; 7:46 - 9:2; 9:4 - 17:15; 17:19 - 18:18; 22:4 - 24:53; John 1:1 - 11:45, 48-57; 12:3 - 13:1, 8-9; 14:8-29; 15:7-8.) Interesting note: The manuscript does not include the pericope of the adulteress (7:53 - 8:11), making it the second earliest witness (next to P66) not to include this spurious passage. (this is one of those mistakes that entered into �bible�). Keep in mind that we are still at the problem as demonstrated with Galatians. http://www.earlham.edu/~seidti/iam/tc_pap75.html
� 250-300 A.D. Here is an image. http://www.bsw.org/project/biblica/bibl82/images/Carta.jpg Again, we have another example of an incomplete copy copied from lost copies removed 140 years or so from their actual time. We are still at the Galatians example.
� 350 A.D. Codex Sinaiticus contains the entire New Testament and almost the entire Old Testament in Greek. It was discovered by a German scholar Tisendorf in 1856 at an Orthodox monastery at http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Mss/sinai.html Saying it was complete would not be the complete truth. The contents are of interest: (It has both the Old and New Testaments. The New Testament contains Four Gospels, Acts, Catholic Epistles and Pauline Epistles (including Hebrews), Apocalypse, the Epistle of Barnabas and Shepherd of Hermas.) So is it reasonable to say that the holy spirit has not yet inspired Christians after 300 years to know what a cannon is and is not? Something else of interest: �Matthew 16:2 f. is omitted, Mark ends at 16:8, Luke 22:43 f. was marked as spurious by the first corrector, but these signs were canceled by the third corrector. John 5:4 and the Pericope de adultera are omitted. The doxology of Romans comes after 16:23 verse 24 being omitted. Hebrews follow immediately after II Thessalonians.� It looks like the holy spirit is having some trouble guiding the faithful. And there is that story of the adulteress again. So after 300 years your scholars do not know if the story actually happened or not. I find it interesting that if we look at the evidences your source puts up, it really creates more problems for your claim.
� 350 A.D. Codex Vaticanus: {B} is an almost complete New Testament. It was cataloged as being in the Vatican Library since 1475 http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Mss/vatican.html A 4th century book. Not only is the adulteress story still omitted, but you are no closer to proving your claim for a continuity going back to Jesus.
|
||||||||||
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/ http://www.pt-go.com/ |
||||||||||
Shibboleth
Guest Group Joined: 06 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
Jewish opponents of Christianity never challenged the powerful works described in the Gospels. Read and find out why. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester_Beatty_Papyri These fragments are palaeographically dated to the first half of the 3rd century, 3rd century! Same New Testament or Christian Greek scriptures we have today in the Bible! PEOPLE I can prove this all day long. It�s God�s word! Let go of what you been told, lies. I�m showing you proof. Again, waaaaaay before your messengers time. FACTS! PROOF! SCIENCE! Shasta's, Meditations,
etc� there are your written accounts of the oral Gospel, the Injeel of Jesus if
you care to read and believe. Do you have blind faith in the face of all proof or you still believe there are no written accounts? Here are 25 Things Muslims don't want other Muslims to know
about the BIBLE below......it�s just too, too hard to swallow. But swallow now
or choke later, YOU decide. The Great Prophet Jeremiah! Whether you like it or not! Like
Paul, he was heaven sent! Edited by Shibboleth - 20 September 2009 at 8:33pm |
||||||||||
�If you doubt what we have revealed to you, ask those who have read the Scriptures before you.� (Sura 10, Yunis [Jonah], verse 94) & (Surah Al �Imran: 84-85)
|
||||||||||
Shibboleth
Guest Group Joined: 06 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
""Definitely each of the mentioned above is a divine revelation when it was revealed, the question is how much of it's original revelation reached us ?""
No matter how much Muslims deny the Bible with it's OldT & NewT you can't get away from the "Facts of Science. Still matches up to the Bible we have in 2009! Why wouldn't it, God promise that he would preserve it! Until YOU can show otherwise it really is a dead issue. 25 Things Muslims don't want you to know about the BIBLE below...... http://www.centuryone.com/25dssfacts.html The Great Prophet Jeremiah! Whether you like it or not! http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22060312-2,00.html You've been told by your Imams all these untruths about the Bible that we have today but it still matches the ones going back 2000 years way before your prophet. Edited by Shibboleth - 20 September 2009 at 7:36pm |
||||||||||
�If you doubt what we have revealed to you, ask those who have read the Scriptures before you.� (Sura 10, Yunis [Jonah], verse 94) & (Surah Al �Imran: 84-85)
|
||||||||||
Shasta'sAunt
Senior Member Female Joined: 29 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1930 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
"or do you mean what was revealed to Jesus ( PBUH ) Al Injeel, which is what people call what they have now and think of it as it is 'The new testament'" Actually, the New Testament is not the Injeel, nor is it the Gospel which Jesus was spreading. The Gospel of Jesus was an oral Gospel and as far as is known there is no written account.
|
||||||||||
�No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.�
Eleanor Roosevelt |
||||||||||
Meditations
Senior Member Joined: 16 November 2002 Status: Offline Points: 239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
It depends on what you mean by the 'bible' do you mean what was revealed to Moses ( PBUH ) Al taw'rah, which is what people call what they have now and think of it as it is 'The old testament' or do you mean what was revealed to Jesus ( PBUH ) Al Injeel, which is what people call what they have now and think of it as it is 'The new testament' Do you mean what was revealed to David ( PBUH ) ? Or is it something that's a combination of all these ? So it depends on what you consider the 'bible' and in which stage in time Definitely each of the mentioned above is a divine revelation when it was revealed, the question is how much of it's original revelation reached us ? Regards |
||||||||||
Shasta'sAunt
Senior Member Female Joined: 29 March 2008 Status: Offline Points: 1930 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
Isn't the true question whether the Bible was ever the Word of God? |
||||||||||
�No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.�
Eleanor Roosevelt |
||||||||||
Shibboleth
Guest Group Joined: 06 August 2009 Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||||||
To Nazarene...................this requires another thread.
The term Gentile (from Latin, gentilis, meaning of or belonging to a clan or tribe) refers to non-Israelite tribes or nations in English translations of the Bible Until 36 C.E. the Christian message was directed solely to Jews, to Gentiles who had become circumcised Jewish proselytes, and to Samaritans. �The �God is not
partial, but in every nation the man that fears him and works righteousness is
acceptable to him.��Acts 10:34, 35. �God has
granted repentance for the purpose of life to people of the nations also.��
(Acts 11:18) Acts
2:17-18 يَقُولُ اللهُ: وَيَكُونُ فِي
الأَيَّامِ الأَخِيرَةِ أَنِّي أَسْكُبُ مِنْ رُوحِي عَلَى كُلِّ بَشَرٍ،
فَيَتَنَبَّأُ بَنُوكُمْ وَبَنَاتُكُمْ، وَيَرَى شَبَابُكُمْ رُؤًى وَيَحْلُمُ
شُيُوخُكُمْ أَحْلاَمًا. 17 And it shall come to pass in
the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your
sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions,
and your old men shall dream dreams: وَعَلَى عَبِيدِي أَيْضًا
وَإِمَائِي أَسْكُبُ مِنْ رُوحِي فِي تِلْكَ الأَيَّامِ فَيَتَنَبَّأُونَ. 18 And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy Acts 2:1-21 2 Now while the day of the [festival of] Pentecost was in progress they
were all together at the same place, 2 and suddenly
there occurred from heaven a noise just like that of a rushing stiff breeze,
and it filled the whole house in which they were sitting. 3 And
tongues as if of fire became visible to them and were distributed about, and
one sat upon each one of them, 4 and they all became
filled with holy spirit and started to speak with different tongues, just as
the spirit was granting them to make utterance. 5 As
it was, there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, reverent men, from every nation
of those under heaven. 6 So, when this sound occurred,
the multitude came together and were bewildered, because each one heard them
speaking in his own language. 7 Indeed, they were
astonished and began to wonder and say: �See here, all these who are speaking
are Gal�i�le�ans, are they not? 8 And yet how is it we
are hearing, each one of us, his own language in which we were born? 9 Par�thi�ans
and Medes and E�lam�ites, and the inhabitants of Mes�o�po�ta�mi�a, and Ju�de�a
and Cap�pa�do�ci�a, Pon�tus and the [district of] Asia, 10 and
Phryg�i�a and Pam�phyl�i�a, Egypt and the parts of Lib�y�a, which is toward Cy�re�ne,
and sojourners from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, 11 Cre�tans
and Arabians, we hear them speaking in our tongues about the magnificent things
of God.� 12 Yes, they were all astonished and were in
perplexity, saying one to another: �What does this thing purport to be?� 13 However,
different ones mocked at them and began to say: �They are full of sweet wine.� 14 But
Peter stood up with the eleven and raised his voice and made this utterance to
them: �Men of Ju�de�a and all YOU inhabitants of Edited by Shibboleth - 19 September 2009 at 4:44pm |
||||||||||
�If you doubt what we have revealed to you, ask those who have read the Scriptures before you.� (Sura 10, Yunis [Jonah], verse 94) & (Surah Al �Imran: 84-85)
|
||||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1 2122232425 31> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |