Whose the Terrorist Muslim or Christian?

Israfil wrote: Your comments are the words of a religious fanatic [of course I'm not saying you are]

Dear Israfil, please go back to the definitions of fanaticism and then weigh my words, please don't use rhetorics without understanding. 

Anatolian

Prophet has fought wars, but you must know that, in all the occassions, he was under attack from the enemy. The attack prophet did finally on Mecca to capture it, as the non believers broke the treaty, was won without any fight.

Have the christians fought any less in europe? invading and colonizing all of the world? your logic of prophet fighting war is poor.

It is true that the church and state is seperate in europe and America, that only has liberated the state in making laws which are against bible. Have no way stopped the christians running the state to think anti Islamic in their christian minds. Establishment of Israel and the entire world politics is anti islamic world, which is of christian minds.

That's why a secular George bush calls for 'crusade' before attacking Iraq and still angelicals are one of the deciding factors in US election, N time theologists still influence US politics, Jewish lobbies are sitting officially in the Capitol hill to influence policies, .................. church and state might have been seperated, majority of the western population might be a christian by name, but the anti islamic policies of the political west hasn't stopped.

So it is ok to call them christians if you look from the other side. Knowledge may have two sides of it, and it depends on which side you are to look foolish or to look Lieish !!!

Though they may not be true christians, if they would understand and follow bible, these problems wouldnot have arisen.