Is Islam true? |
Post Reply | Page <1 4567> |
Author | |
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
airmano
Senior Member Joined: 31 March 2014 Status: Offline Points: 884 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
When I look at the different translations some of them clearly talk of slaves (see Picktall & Muhammad Sarwar for example). The French would say: "Calling a cat a cat". My standard guess is that the more modern translations try to avoid this word for obvious reasons.
It is a bit the same logic as for the age of Aisha: Until the middle of the last century it was widely accepted that she was still a child when she (was) married (to) Mohamed. As it became obvious that there was a severe problem, a flock of eager scholars moved in to "shift" her age up. Airmano Edited by airmano - 21 January 2016 at 1:16pm |
|
The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses (Albert Einstein 1954, in his "Gods Letter")
|
|
Caringheart
Senior Member Joined: 02 March 2012 Status: Offline Points: 2991 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
It seems silly to me, to be having a semantics argument...
it seems pretty clear that maid servant means nothing more or less than, female slave. |
|
Let us seek Truth together
Blessed be God forever "I believe in Jesus as I believe in the sun... not because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else.: - C.S.Lewis |
|
Ron Webb
Senior Member Male atheist Joined: 30 January 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada Status: Offline Points: 2467 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I don't see why not, but anyway they are not concubines. According to corpus.quran.com, three translations use the word "slaves" (Pickthall, Muhammad Sarwar, and Mohsin Khan). The other four stay with the literal version, "those whom your right hands possess". None of them use anything like "maid servants". |
|
Addeenul �Aql � Religion is intellect.
|
|
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The dictionary definition of 'servant' includes slave of the old time (read '...of a Master'), and a (read personal employer) for the paid worker of recent times. Thus this translation brings better enactment of this verse for, IMHO, all times.
Edited by AhmadJoyia - 21 January 2016 at 9:26pm |
|
Ron Webb
Senior Member Male atheist Joined: 30 January 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada Status: Offline Points: 2467 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Yes, a servant can be either a paid worker or a slave. But a possession can only be a slave.
|
|
Addeenul �Aql � Religion is intellect.
|
|
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1647 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Same as when you pay someone, you 'own/posses' his services. More so, if s/he resides with you, you 'own/posses' more than her/his just services.
Edited by AhmadJoyia - 21 January 2016 at 10:19pm |
|
Tim the plumber
Senior Member Male Joined: 30 September 2014 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 944 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No you do not. Not unless you are being exploitive. |
|
Post Reply | Page <1 4567> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |