IslamiCity.org Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Religion - Islam > Interfaith Dialogue
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1 Timothy 2 and the "silent" women  What is Islam What is Islam  Donate Donate
  FAQ FAQ  Quran Search Quran Search  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

1 Timothy 2 and the "silent" women

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Patty View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 14 September 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2382
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Patty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 1 Timothy 2 and the "silent" women
    Posted: 04 June 2006 at 11:42am

Annie also stated,

"Sex only for procreation is another subject.  Does this mean that once the wife becomes pregnant that all sex should stop?  Desire stops?  God did not make humans that way.  That in itself should tell us that God intended the pleasure of sex to be more than just for procreation."

Sex was also to bond the husband and wife and refers to marriage as becoming "one flesh".  We are to be "open" to conception.  If God wants the woman to become pregant and she does, great!  If not, it isn't meant to be at that time. 

Annie, if you're really interested in learning what the Church truly teaches and believes, don't rely on friends trying to tell you.  You need a scholar.  One of the best things you can do to inform yourself properly is read the Catechism of the Catholic Church....or at least look up parts on which you have questions.  (I'm not trying to convert you, just offer some suggestions for help.)  I hate to see twisted lies, myths, etc., which are spread far too often about the Church.  It is much better to read it from the Vatican website, than to listen to the biased, horribly uninformed, media....or friends who don't really know Church history or doctrine.  It's very important to know the truth.

Peace and Blessings, Annie.

Patty

I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future.
Back to Top
Patty View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 14 September 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2382
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Patty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2006 at 11:32am

Dear Annie,

You said the following:

"I think that Jesus showed that men and women were equal.  He had a lot of women followers and many became leaders in the very early church.  So since women were allowed to become leaders there must have been some concensus among Jesus' Apostles that this would be acceptable to Jesus."

Of course Jesus held women and men as equals.  He loved women, and some of his closest and dearest followers were women.  There was, however, no concensus that women were to be priests.  (Just as men cannot ever give birth.) The priesthood is reserved only for men, because Christ in his human form was a man.  Further, the original 12 disciples went on to follow in the Tradition of Christ and chose all male bishops after them.

"Weren't there women leaders in the Old Testament?"

There were highly regarded women in the Old Testament for sure, but we're talking New Testament here....when Jesus established His Church here on earth.

"Do you think there will come a time that women will be allowed to be priests in the Catholic church.  My Catholic friends think so."

No, I don't believe that will happen.  It is a very anti-Catholic desire by some Catholics....they are considered dissidents, or protestors.  They usually belong to dissident groups who would like to "change the Church", such as Voice of the Faithful, CORPUS, Call to Action, etc.  They are not recognized by Rome, and are getting pretty close to being out of communion with the Vatican.  Some have already been excommunicated as their proposed changes are nothing more than heresy.  I do believe that one day Roman Catholic priests will not be required to take vows of celibacy and will be given the option of marrying.  Right now the Church still believes a celibate priest is more able to focus entirely on his "flock", his parishioners.  If he were married, his focus would be divided between his flock and his wife and children.  That distraction is not what the Church wants at this time.

As I have always said, as long as we follow what our conscience tells us is correct, love God above all else, and love our neighbors as ourselfves, It seems to me that God will take this all into consideration on Judgement Day.  But the Catholic Church will not fall, because Jesus said it would not when he first established it.  So if there are individuals who, after great studying and prayer, find they can no longer can accept the teachings of the Holy Catholic Church, my own personal opinion is they should find a church with which they do agree (always remembering they are more than welcome to return at any time.)  Catholics are returning in droves to the Church.  Many left during the 70's, and are now coming back to their Catholic roots.  Also during this year's Easter Vigil, over 200,000 converts were received into the Church in the US alone.

God Bless You Always, Annie!

 

Patty

I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future.
Back to Top
DavidC View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male Christian
Joined: 20 September 2001
Location: Florida USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2474
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2006 at 6:39am
The subservience of women was universal throughout the early church.  That is a historical fact.  It is reflected in scripture, but when you read the first bishops of the church it is spelled out very clearly.

As to procreation, that was not considered important or even desirable.  The early Christians were trying to avoid the world, not be more involved with it.

Pick up a history of the early church sometime.  You will be quite surprised at how different early Christianity was from our current belief system.
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
Back to Top
AnnieTwo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AnnieTwo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2006 at 5:26am
Hi Patty,

There are very good reasons why women will not be ordained as priests in the Catholic Church.  It is because nowhere did Jesus choose any woman as a disciple, or apostle....and they were the first priests.  If He had wanted women to be priests we have no doubt He would have chosen one while he was here on earth.  But He did not do this.  He gave absolutely no sign and said no words to indicate He wanted women to perform as a priest.

I think that Jesus showed that men and women were equal.  He had a lot of women followers and many became leaders in the very early church.  So since women were allowed to become leaders there must have been some concensus among Jesus' Apostles that this would be acceptable to Jesus.

Weren't there women leaders in the Old Testament?  I would have to research that.  But if Jesus did not think that women should be priests and pastors I would think that he would have said so and he didn't.

Do you think there will come a time that women will be allowed to be priests in the Catholic church.  My Catholic friends think so.

Good wishes to you,

Annie


14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4

Back to Top
AnnieTwo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 281
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AnnieTwo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2006 at 5:21am
Originally posted by DavidC DavidC wrote:

By early Christians I refer to the Apostolic Fathers - Mar�ion, Tertuillian, Justin Martyr, Iraneus etc.

My point was that women were not considered equal in those times, and were actually thought to be dangerous avenues where sin could enter the church.

Then they obvious did not have a command of the scriptures.

They were not misusing Paul; Paul's anti-woman message was entirely part of the times.  Paul thought women and marriage were best avoided (1 Corinthians 7).

I just read 1 Corinthians 7 and did not get the impression you have.  Paul is saying that marriage is beneficial in order to avoid sexual misconduct.  The ideal would be to remain celibate.  But if a person cannot remain celibate, it is best that they marry.  How else would we have children?  I don't consider anything in 1 Corinthians 7 "anti-woman."  Maybe you could point me to the exact verse.  Thanks.

Scripture has been revealed more fully today, but the early Christians' belief system was quite different.

I honestly don't believe that men didn't understand what the scriptures said in those times.  As I pointed out all they had to do was look at Jesus and his acceptance of women.  They needn't have brought their "misinterpretation/misuse" of Paul into it at all.


Further than that, David, if you set religion aside, you see women being put down all over the place by some men and in some very subtle ways and some not so subtle ways and they aren't using holy books to do it.  I don't know what it is.  Is it a macho thing?  A feeling of inferiority on the part of men?  What I mean by that is: are some men "angry" that they have to rely on a woman for their sexual needs and sometimes the woman says no?  I think there are a lot of men to do not see women as their equals.  I don't know why.

Annie
14If you are reproached for the name of Christ, blessed are you, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you. On their part He is blasphemed, but on your part He is glorified. 1 Peter 4

Back to Top
Patty View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 14 September 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2382
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Patty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 June 2006 at 6:30pm

Men are to honor and love their wives:

Prov 12:4  A virtuous woman [is] a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed [is] as rottenness in his bones. 

Prov 31:10  Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price [is] far above rubies. 11 The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil. 12 She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.

Prov 31:28  Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband [also], and he praiseth her. 

Colossians 3:19 Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them.

1 Timothy 5:8 But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

Ecclesiastes 9:9 Live joyfully with the wife whom thou lovest all the days of the life of thy vanity, which he hath given thee under the sun, all the days of thy vanity: for that is thy portion in this life, and in thy labour which thou takest under the sun.

Peace be with you.

Patty

I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future.
Back to Top
Patty View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Joined: 14 September 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2382
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Patty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 June 2006 at 6:20pm

Annie said,

"According to my Catholic friends, women are still having a hard time being priests.  This is causing a problem within the Catholic church because men are leaving and/or are getting very old.  Women could fill the void, but are prevented from doing so."

There are very good reasons why women will not be ordained as priests in the Catholic Church.  It is because nowhere did Jesus choose any woman as a disciple, or apostle....and they were the first priests.  If He had wanted women to be priests we have no doubt He would have chosen one while he was here on earth.  But He did not do this.  He gave absolutely no sign and said no words to indicate He wanted women to perform as a priest.

Additionally, as all Catholics know, during the ceremony of the Sacrament of Holy Orders, when men are ordained into the priesthood by the bishops or cardinals, the new priest receives a "mark" on his soul, similar to the one we receive at the Sacrament of Baptism, which can never be removed, NEVER.  The priest acts in "persona Christi", in the place of Christ, when celebrating mass, hearing confessions, or administering any of the other five Sacraments.  Since he is in EVERY WAY the representative of Jesus during the administration of Sacraments and during mass, a woman cannot become a priest. 

However, we perform all other duties within the Church.  The one and ONLY position we do not hold is that of priest, for the reasons I stated above.

God's Peace.

Patty

I don't know what the future holds....but I know who holds the future.
Back to Top
DavidC View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar
Male Christian
Joined: 20 September 2001
Location: Florida USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2474
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DavidC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 June 2006 at 5:19pm
By early Christians I refer to the Apostolic Fathers - Mar�ion, Tertuillian, Justin Martyr, Iraneus etc.

My point was that women were not considered equal in those times, and were actually thought to be dangerous avenues where sin could enter the church.

They were not misusing Paul; Paul's anti-woman message was entirely part of the times.  Paul thought women and marriage were best avoided (1 Corinthians 7).

Scripture has been revealed more fully today, but the early Christians' belief system was quite different.
Christian; Wesleyan M.Div.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.