Gezi Park Protests in Perspective By: Serkan Zorba Source: iViews Jun 21, 2013 4 Comments Category: Europe, Featured, World Affairs Topics: Istanbul, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey Views: 2074 One has to distinguish between two kinds of protests that emerged from the Gezi Park demonstrations in Istanbul, Turkey: an innocent and legitimate one that took place in the early days of the protests, and a transmogrified version of the latter into a social engineering project to bring down the democratically elected and widely popular government of the AKP, Erdogan's Justice and Development Party. The latter had been attempted numerous times within the decade-long rule of the AKP. As an excuse for the continued protests, some charge Erdogan with becoming increasingly authoritarian by citing the recent alcohol restriction law, the attempted abortion law etc. in Turkey. The curious thing is, similar laws and discussions are common in some Western countries. Some brazenly go even as far as likening him to Hosni Mubarak, Gaddafi, or al-Assad. The latter were the unelected leaders of despotic regimes. Erdogan has been a legitimately elected leader for three consecutive times, each time winning the elections with a landslide victory. Obviously there is something this guy and his cabinet must be doing increasingly well that resonates with the majority of the Turkish people for the last decade. The US republican senator John McCain, for example, said recently that Erdogan is acting like a "dictator." The Economist magazine published an article the other day tacitly blaming Erdogan to behave like a sultan. This is a magazine that overtly pushes for a government change in Turkey since the last couple of years. Before the 2011 elections, for example, the Economist encouraged Turkish people to vote for the main opposition party instead of the AKP, which is an Islamically conservative democratic party. Why is it that the West is not even-handed vis-a-vis the AKP? I think one important reason is Islamophobia .. There is so much Islamophobia in the Western media that even the most reasonable person can be biased against anything Islamic. The West needs to distinguish between extremist and ordinary Muslims. If they approach anything Islamic with the same, overtly or covertly, phobia and one-sidedness then I am afraid this will only exacerbate the situation and further the already-existing friction between the West and the Muslim world. Erdogan certainly has some lessons to learn from the recent protests: to show more understanding toward the way of life and sensitivities of those who don't support him, to tone down his sometimes harsh rhetoric, and to really weigh his cabinets' giant projects well from environmental and sustainability perspective, and have them thoroughly thrashed out in public before his government goes ahead with them. Erdogan is no ordinary politician: he is very ambitious, industrious, forthright, and yes sometimes a bit harsh and intractable. He is an overachiever. People usually don't realize that it is this set of characters that makes him so successful in effecting real tangible success in the political arena, and an awful lot of admirers and some haters. A March 2013 poll done by Pew Research Center in Turkey shows that 62% of the participants viewed him favorably. I aver that his story is a daring political success story that might even be taught at political institutions and financial schools some day. Erdogan's cabinet made unprecedented reforms in Turkey within the last decade: democratic, political, and economic reforms. Some of these can be briefly stated as follows: Democratic reforms that enabled a much larger segment of the Turkish society to have a say in the governance of their country; reforms that brought about the recognition of the reality of a Kurdish problem in Turkey; reforms that lifted the ban on the speaking of the Kurdish language and establishment of TV channels broadcasting in Kurdish. Political reforms that made it virtually impossible to do coup d'etats that were all too common in the pre-AKP days, political reforms that are close to resolving the momentous Kurdish problem. The AKP has recently pulled off a very important ceasefire with the PKK, the leading Kurdish guerilla group in Turkey. The latter is a very high-stake political risk Erdogan overtook, and arguably no other political figure can and will be able to do in the foreseeable future of the Turkish political landscape. Economic reforms that oversaw almost quadrupling of the per capita income, many-fold increase of Turkish exports, total payoff of the debt to IMF, reduction of inflation from chronic two digit numbers to a single digit number, a mind-boggling infrastructure development such as double-lane roads, improved hospitals and schools, and on and on. The recent protests in Turkey might be a red herring to most Westerners as they occur during the so-called Arab Spring, where truly oppressed people have been rising up to their unelected, cruel and corrupt dictators. The Gezi Park protests must be viewed against the backdrop of the recent political history of Turkey. Confusing the Turkish case with the Arab Spring case, and comparing Erdogan with the ruthless and unscrupulous dictators of the relevant Arab countries is the ultimate insult to intellectual fairness and to the tens of thousands of people, a lot of them women and children, who have been killed and tortured till this day by the dictators of those countries. The now a decade-long rule of the AKP, starting in the 2002 general elections, marks a watershed in the recent history of Turkey. Turkey has witnessed a class struggle, a local political cold war between the elite guard of the militarist secularist regime and the hitherto oppressed and silenced conservative-religious majority. The latter were prevented from occupying high government, military, and bureaucratic offices: their daughters were prevented from attending higher education institutions; their sons prevented from rising up in the chain of command in the military; their democratically elected politicians harassed and sometimes executed, and their parties routinely shut down. These people waited patiently. Then came a not-so-unexpected or uncommon financial meltdown in 2001, where Turkish economy went virtually bankrupt overnight. Enter Erdogan and his friends to the Turkish political scene in earnest in 2002, touching off the recent Turkish "revolution." The deep secularist establishment tried every trick they could find to stop the inevitable: they used their bureaucratic tentacles to stop the AKP, they attempted many coups d'etat; but it was to no avail. Then in 2007, it occurred to them to organize countrywide protests (the so-called Cumhuriyet Mitingleri, i.e., the Republic Protests) with the tacit aim of instigating a coup, as Ergenekon trials revealed later on, portraying themselves in the process to the world as a grassroots movement. It all failed. Now without taking away anything from the legitimacy of the early peaceful days of the Gezi Park protests, I venture to say that the protestors of the ongoing and violent protests are trying to accomplish what the Republic Protests attempted to do but couldn't, except in a violent way a la the Arab Spring: to bring down a legitimately elected and still widely supported government. These extended and violent protests/riots should be viewed in that light, and not as an uprising of an oppressed people in the sense of the oppression of the peoples of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, or Syria. The Taksim Square protestors should understand that it is unnatural of them to expect an outcome similar to what happened in some of the above Arab countries as a result of the uprisings. This would be a big political blunder. Turkey is a democratic country where many democratic channels are available for political and civil action. If the opposition did their job properly with tangible, consistent and convincing policy-making, then they probably would not have had to go to the streets to protests some of the policies of Erdogan. Some of these issues and "problematic" plans would have been dealt with before they took effect or realized. It is time for them and their parties' leaders to look at themselves in the mirror and get the lesson they should get from these protests: They have done very poorly in the legitimate political arena. The main opposition party in Turkey, CHP, the Republican People's Party, could not put together any viable set of policies that could counter the AKP advance for three consecutive elections. All they did during the last decade was to oppose by default to any proposal the AKP put forward, and every now and then call for military intervention. The so-called secularist segment of the Turkish society, i.e., the "elite guard" of the Kemalist regime, boasts itself to be well educated and modern, and usually they look down on the AKP base as being not as educated and smart. Isn't it past time for them to ask themselves how come in spite of their "education" and "modernity," they seem absolutely incapable of establishing a viable democratic party with a well-thought-out set of plans and projects that will effectively compete with the policies of the AKP and be convincing to everyday people? ***** Dr. Serkan Zorba is associate professor of physics at Whittier College, CA, USA. He is originally from Turkey. His web site is www.serkanzorba.com. Related posts from similar topics: Istanbul: Most Important Bridge between East and West Recent Turkey Coup Attempt and the Western Hypocrisy: How the West is Enabling Islamic Extremism The Long Turkish Night of Islamic Democracy Turkey’s Attempted Coup Turkey Coup: Civilians Swarm Tanks In Istanbul Hagia Sofia Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 4 Comments Comment Ayesha from Canada June 22nd, 2013 A very objective analysis of the events in Turkey. It is plain and clear Islamphobia and Muslim bias is at work here in covering the events in Turkey. the CNNns and BBCs of the world are nothing but biased against any thing to do with Muslims and Islam. Presently , tear gas, rubber bullets, batons are being used against protestors in Brazil but you will not hear a word of condemnation from the USA, UK, EU, UN --- the hypocrites. You make a telling point about the "The so-called secularist segment of the Turkish society, i.e., the "elite guard" of the Kemalist regime, boasts itself to be well educated and modern, and usually they look down on the AKP base as being not as educated and smart." I ask at whose expense did the get themselves well educated? They kept the majority Muslim pouplation in the rural areas of Turkey, they banned Muslim women from wearing the headscarf in Universities and to hold jobs in the public and private sector and stole the best professional jobs for themselves. The secularists divided the country into BlaCk Turks (the majority) and White Turks (the minority) exactly as happened in South Africa where the minority ruled over the majority and kept them oppressed for generations without giving them equal access to a good education, good jobs and the opportunity to uplift themselves from working class into the middle and upper class. Now that the AKP government is opening up the country for all its citizens to have equal access, this White Turk beer and alcohol swilling minority just cannot handle this change and the eradication of their ill-gotten privileges. We should make lots of dua in the blessed month of Ramadan that will be with us soon for the continued success of Erdogan, the AKP government and make dua for strength and protection from Allah Subhantuala for the pious Muslims of Turkey. These Kemalists with their "superority complex and their attitude of looking down on the majority Muslim population" must be destroyed insha paagle from USA June 21st, 2013 The author effectively defends Erdogan and the AKP on many fronts. But... 1) He completely ignores the iron fist Erdogan has shown the Turkish media. Turkey has more journalists in jail than China - which is saying a lot. Whether these protests have been taken over by old guard Kemalists or not, they are certainly very newsworthy. But until recently (and perhaps even still) the Turkish media was too afraid to cover them! 2) He blithely claims the West is grossly, unfairly biased against Islam, but cannot mention that the Islamic world shows at least as much unfair bias against the West. Based on what I read in English on the internet there are a large number of Muslims who willfully, grossly distort life in and the values of the western world. I can only imagine what is said in Arabic, Farsi, Urdu, etc. The truth is neither side seems to like the other much, and there's good as well as bad reasons on both sides. But the fact is Muslims can live their lives in security and practice their religion fully all over the West. Non- believers of all sorts live in mortal fear in much of the Islamic world. 3) He callously equates secularists with Kemalists. It is not the case that every Turk who does not believe in Islam or believes in Islam but also thinks people should be able to live without the yoke of religious law is a supporter of the former military government. Given the insecure conditions non-believers live in in most of the Islamic world - especially the nearby Arab part of it - it is completely understandable that fair minded, secular Turks might fear for their individual rights given the winner-take-all attitude evinced by Erdogan and his fellow Islamists. sam from usa June 21st, 2013 Comparing Erdogan to other dictators of the region shows that either these analysts of the West are dumb or that they think that people are so dumb that they can be manipulated to think their way. Erdogan's popularity of 62% is what no president in the West can dream of after being in power for more than 10 years. While the economy of the West is melting Turkey's has been steadily rising. Erdogan is obviously doing something very right that the rulers of the West are not. I sincerely hope that Turkey does not join the European Union just to share their economic meltdown. May God help all the just rulers of the world. Babandi A.Gumel from U.K June 21st, 2013 Jazakallah Dr Serkan for bringing everything into proper perspective. Now our eyes are opened Mr Erdogan is right and the protestors are being used covertly or overtly by the opposition to bring down a legitimate government of Mr Erdogan by all means. They resent seeing him being so popular among the masses unlike the likes of the Mubaraks or the Gaddafis. A person who is truthful and just would be supported by all peace loving truthful people no matter what opposition he faces eventually the truth will triumph by the Grace of Allah.