Stranger Things or Stranger Politics


The Oath Keepers say left-wing activists are the real domestic terrorists, and their members are now the self-proclaimed protectors of free speech. Infowars has started selling T-shirts claiming, “Conservatism is the New Counterculture.” And WorldNet Daily, a publication that once claimed eating soy made you gay, has a correspondent in the White House.

Even Stormfront, once the web’s preeminent cauldron of racist sentiment, has been overtaken by The Daily Stormer, a scrappier, far more anti-Semitic website that month-after-month attracts more racists than Don Black’s antiquated corner of the web.

It doesn’t take a long view of history to see that the United States under President Trump — from blue California to red Kentucky — is radically different than it was just months ago. Left is right. Top is bottom. The news is fake. And Trump tweeting “covfefe” in the middle of the night makes perfect sense.

There couldn’t be stranger politics. In fact, the country now exists in the “upside down.”

The term, popularized by the hit Netflix series Stranger Things, refers to an alternate reality where the world is an opposite version of itself, a dark mirrored take on things that for the kid sleuths who discover it, is haunted by monsters.

It’s a “Freaky Friday” kind of politics — a reversal of the way things were that has seen ideas born on the radical right elevated into the mainstream along with a cast of characters who bring in tow ideologies that for decades had been relegated to the political margin.

There’s Stephen K. Bannon, Trump’s senior adviser, who once described Brietbart News, which he led, as the media arm of the racist Alt-Right, and Sebastian Gorka, a Hungarian and American analyst who continues to serve as Trump’s chief strategist and adviser despite his fondness for the Nazi-linked Vitézi Rend. And don’t forget Stephen Miller, Trump’s senior advisor for policy who cut his teeth at the feet of anti-Muslim figurehead David Horowitz and drafted the first version of Trump’s so-called “Muslim ban.”

But this had been coming for some time. Even before Trump’s rise and the ascendancy of the Alt-Right, conspiracy theories and wild-eyed worries of “white genocide” that formed the backbone to an angry and violent radical right had been working their way into the mainstream.

In recent decades, anti-immigrant worries have become the coin of the realm for many politicians — the same elected officials who fretted over United Nation’s Agenda 21, a non-binding resolution for sustainable, environmentally conscious growth, and are now falling in line with President Trump’s plans to build a wall on the country’s southern border with Mexico to keep out “rapists.” In fact, 16 years after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the so-called “War on Terror” has become a worried rallying cry for those who see in Muslim immigration an invasion intent on destroying the West.

Yes, in the upside down, those fears are now facts. White nationalists — who now call themselves proud members of the Alt-Right — remind us daily in newspapers, and across the web, this is Trump’s America now. Or, as Richard Spencer, the white nationalist who claims credit for coining the phrase ‘Alt-Right’ screamed into an iPhone on Election Night: “The Alt-Right won!”

Even though Spencer is no stranger to drunken pronouncements, his boast shouldn’t be dismissed. The movement of extremist ideas from the margins to the mainstream is at once a story told in real-time and one foretold by history. It is the story of an elevated and angry politics in the halls of power, and the strange reality that the ideologies of hate and extremism are the new normal.

 

Source: Southern Poverty Law Center


Related posts from similar topics:


Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein, through this post or comments, contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. These are offered as a means for IslamiCity to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization. The IslamiCity site may occasionally contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. IslamiCity is making such material available in its effort to advance understanding of humanitarian, education, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and such (and all) material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use any copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

No Comments